View Single Post
  #4  
Old December 10th 03, 07:11 AM
PF Riley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default SIDS research "flawed;"clues ignored: researcher

On Tue, 09 Dec 2003 21:44:22 GMT, "Roger Schlafly"
wrote:

"Why do mainstream researchers see the apparent success of the
back-to-sleep campaign as a major victory?" Dr. Goldwater asks.
"Clearly, if we care to look at the rates of SIDS in 1970, these are the
same as the low rates of today. Many babies were sleeping prone in 1970,
yet SIDS was relatively uncommon."


Good question. I think that prone sleeping is superior.


Since you're an idiot, though, what you think is largely irrelevant.

PF