ParentingBanter.com - View Single Post - In gender wars, advocates for boys battle back

Andre Lieven

"Kitty" ) whines:
Orlando Enrique Fiol wrote:
wrote:
No, girls wear clothing to please THEMSELVES, but even if girls have
other motivations we don't put girls in bee-keeper suits in order that
boys don't need to control themselves.
Each of us is totally responsible for our own behavior, no matter what
a person wears.

Oh? So, girls need to wear skimpy clothing in order to feel pleased
with themselves? Who are you kidding? Girls are taught to wear that
sort of clothing because it turns boys on. It's part of the
socialization process of becoming sexualized.

Male arousal is really none of my concern. Each person is totally
responsible for their own self control and that includes arousal.

Cause and effect. You can't stamp out the effect without also adjusting
its cause.

Boys can't BE boys at the expense of everyone else, Orlando. So,
you're right that we DON'T give boys special rights to make lude
remarks in school or to grope. And even if it did "address the
tension" girls don't owe boys sex. It's just that simple. Boys must
control themselves, and their daddy's too.

Boys can't be boys at girls' expense, but girls can be girls at boys'
expense? How is this fair?

And again, boys can't trample the rights of girls just because they
can't find self control.

They wouldn't need to exercise so much self control if they weren't
mercilessly teased.

Oh puhleeze!
When a girl or a woman dresses utilitarian, and doesn't use makeup, all
you hear is why don't you dress more like other women, put some make up
on! What are you a guy or a girl. And you hear that from other men, not
other women.

Cites ? Your ass doesn't count...

But, thanks for proving that bimbos just cannot get it:

" The plural of 'anecdote' is NOT 'citation'. "

Go back to kindergarten, oh inane and fact free gurly.

Andre