View Single Post
  #3  
Old April 23rd 08, 04:06 PM
Tudor Tudor is offline
Junior Member
 
First recorded activity by ParentingBanter: Apr 2008
Posts: 2
Default

"In October 1981, Dr. Hamer presented his research to the University of Tübingen as a post-doctoral thesis. The objective was to have his findings tested on equivalent cases so that German New Medicine could be taught to all medical students and patients could benefit from the discoveries as soon as possible. But to his great surprise, the University committee rejected his work and refused to evaluate his thesis, an unprecedented case in the history of universities"

"Yet, to this day, the University of Tübingen refuses, despite court orders in 1986 and 1994, to test Dr. Hamer’s scientific work."
http://germannewmedicine.ca/documents/hamerbio.html

"Verification of GNM by University of Trnava, Slovakia

On 8 and 9 September 1998, seven patients were seen at the Saint Elisabeth Institute of Oncology at Bratislava and the Oncology Unit of the Hospital at Trnava, respectively, in the presence of the Deputy Vice Chancellor of the University of Trnava, the Dean of the Faculty of Nursing and Social Science, and ten other Professors and Lecturers. The said seven patients presented with 20 particular medical conditions (Dr. Hamer prepared minutes of the examination of such patients, which are attached hereto). The objective was to establish whether his system of medicine could be verified by using a scientific method to show that his results are repeatable. This has been the case.
Pursuant to the rules of "New Medicine" each and every particular disease can be tested for about 100 different facts. Due to incomplete medical test results not all such 100 facts could be tested for. However, those facts which could be tested, indicated that all natural laws of the "New Medicine" which are the foundation of the "New Medicine" were valid.
His system was put to the test at the said two conferences. The undersigned are of the view that the validity of the system was sufficiently proven with a high of probability.
We value very highly Dr Hamer's humanity, his ethical and caring attitude toward the patient and the new holistic approach to the patient. Considering all such factors, we have gained the impression that the question, as to how the "New Medicine" could be applied as soon as possible, should be given attention.

DATED AT TRNAVA 11.9.1998

Prof. MUDr. J. Pogady, DrSc, Prof. of Psychiatry
Signed (illegible)
Prof. MUDr. V. Krcmery, DrSc, Dean of the Faculty
Signed (illegible)
Doc. RNDr. J. Miklosko, DrSc, Deputy Vice-Chancellor Research
Signed (illegible)

Something is wrong here!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff View Post

This is utter nonsense. If this treatment is so good, please provide the
references to the peer-reviewed papers that back it.

Jeff