"Robert" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:02:39 -0700, "Chris" wrote:


"Ms. MICHEL'LE" wrote in message
...

From: (Shawn Hirn)
In article ,
(Ms. MICHEL'LE) wrote:
Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling
WASHINGTON, D.C., APRIL 18, 2007 (Zenit.org).- The chairman of the U.S.
bishops' Committee for Pro-Life Activities has welcomed the Supreme
Court decision upholding a ban on partial birth abortion.

Why would this surprise anyone? This news story warrants one paragraph
at most.

Why is it that SOME men have a problem with Pro-life? Could it be that
they dont like paying child support? Taking care of their
responsibilities?? Hmmmm?

"Child support" is the man's responsibility ONLY legally.



Only to homo sapient males that have the morals of a Hyena.
A real man doesn't need a law to force him to do right to the children
that he sired. Or to assist other children to the best of his ability.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Nowadays, it seems to me, the only people who talk about "real men" are
feminists who are trying to get men to do what suits women.

(By the way, I suggest you consult a dictionary about the meaning of
"homo sapiens." The hyenas are laughing up their sleeves at you.)