On 20 Feb 2007, 0:- wrote:

On Feb 20, 1:25 pm, Doan wrote:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007, 0:-] wrote:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:57:33 -0800, Doan wrote:

On 18 Feb 2007, Dan Sullivan wrote:

When Dixon was wrapping up her closing arguments on Wednesday, she
placed a child's birthday cake in front of the jury. The cake had
eight candles. Dixon lit them. She sang Happy Birthday to Josef, who
was eight years old when he died. And while the jurors watched, the
Smiths looked away, clung to each other, and sobbed. Dixon said that
Josef's birthday cake would always be missing something -- the candle
for his ninth birthday.

An uncalled for theatrical stunt by the prosecutor.

Nonetheless tha parents got what they deserved.

Yup! The jury had spoken!

And how carefully you avoid the issue of The Question...where the line
is between discipline...which they claimed they were doing.. and that
they claimed that's all they were doing, and abuse which too often is
deadly.

The jury had spoken, STUPID. They had determined where the line is

Where did they establish the line had been crossed? At Death?

"Discipline's always appropriate," Dixon said after the verdict, "but
there is... a line that you cannot cross. And when you're leaving
marks and scarring all over the body of your child, that is highly
inappropriate and should be prosecuted to the fullest extent."

Learn to read, STUPID!

and
it has been crossed.

Well now that's brilliant, monkeyboy. We'd have never known that
without you. R R R R

That is because YOU ARE STUPID! Hihihi!

Don't know how to read, STUPID "never-spanked" boy?

Apparently "too-often-spanked screeching hysterical boy" you don't
know how to read or think.

Hihihi! Exposing your STUPIDITY again, Kane?

Show where the jury established the position of "the line," Doan.

By their verdict, STUPID!

0:-]

0:-