On Tue, 20 Feb 2007, 0:-] wrote:

On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:18:36 -0800, Doan wrote:

On 20 Feb 2007, 0:- wrote:

On Feb 20, 1:25 pm, Doan wrote:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007, 0:-] wrote:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:57:33 -0800, Doan wrote:

On 18 Feb 2007, Dan Sullivan wrote:

When Dixon was wrapping up her closing arguments on Wednesday, she
placed a child's birthday cake in front of the jury. The cake had
eight candles. Dixon lit them. She sang Happy Birthday to Josef, who
was eight years old when he died. And while the jurors watched, the
Smiths looked away, clung to each other, and sobbed. Dixon said that
Josef's birthday cake would always be missing something -- the candle
for his ninth birthday.

An uncalled for theatrical stunt by the prosecutor.

Nonetheless tha parents got what they deserved.

Yup! The jury had spoken!

And how carefully you avoid the issue of The Question...where the line
is between discipline...which they claimed they were doing.. and that
they claimed that's all they were doing, and abuse which too often is
deadly.

The jury had spoken, STUPID. They had determined where the line is

Where did they establish the line had been crossed? At Death?

"Discipline's always appropriate," Dixon said after the verdict, "but
there is... a line that you cannot cross. And when you're leaving
marks and scarring all over the body of your child, that is highly
inappropriate and should be prosecuted to the fullest extent."

Learn to read, STUPID!

I have. Remember the case last year where a city councilman was found
innocent though he used a belt and left marks on his son?

What does that have to do with this case, STUPID!

In other words, Doan, like always, you lie or are stupid, or both.

The proven STUPID LIAR is yOU, like always, Kane.

And you have read on aps different views on "spanking" and whether
leaving marks is okay..some saying yes, some no.

Hihihi! "reasonable person" standard, remember?

In other words, stupid, no one, not even a jury, really can say.

The jury had spoken in this case, STUPID!

I notice there is NO confusion about crossing the line on speeding
while driving. Go over 65 in a 65 zone and we all agree, with our
without a trial, with or without a jury, that the line has been
crossed.

So going 15mph in a 65 zone is ok? YOU ARE STUPID!!!

and
it has been crossed.

Well now that's brilliant, monkeyboy. We'd have never known that
without you. R R R R

That is because YOU ARE STUPID! Hihihi!

So, have you determined just where, before death, the line was
crossed, Doan?

"Reasonable person" standard!

Are you going to claim "marks?" How many marks, Doan?

"reasonable person" standard! Are you going to stop talking to your
kids because you don't know where the line is, Kane? Hihihi!

Don't know how to read, STUPID "never-spanked" boy?

Apparently "too-often-spanked screeching hysterical boy" you don't
know how to read or think.

Hihihi! Exposing your STUPIDITY again, Kane?

Exposing yours.

Hihihi! Your STUPIDITY is showing!


Show where the jury established the position of "the line," Doan.

By their verdict, STUPID!

I didn't say how, I said "where," Doan.

Hihihi! Ask the jury, STUPID!

Still can't read and don't want to learn? R RRRR R R R

Still STUPID and a liar, Kane?

No show what the jury said about the positon of "the line," Doan.

It has been crossed, STUPID!

Your games just show your willingness to lie.

The proven LIAR is YOU! Hihihi!

0:-


0:-]

0:-