In message , john wrote:


"D. C. Sessions" wrote in message
...
Apparently, smallpox may have been good for
something after all: it may have given some
partial immunity to AIDS

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8686750.stm

Such a load of ********

"Experts say the vaccine used to wipe out smallpox offered some protection
against the Aids virus and, now it is no longer used, HIV has flourished."

Smallpox vaccine was implicated in introducing AIDS
http://whale.to/vaccines/aids1.htm

That makes sense -- after all, AIDS appeared right after
smallpox vaccination began, and in the same places too.
Then when smallpox vaccination ended, so did AIDS.

Oh, wait ...

Well, OK, the vaccine seems to be of some use
against HIV/AIDS. But it's not too large a
stretch to conclude that smallpox might have
had the same effect.


personally I think HIV is a fabrication, at the least completely harmless
http://whale.to/aids.html

while the drugs and aids umbrella diagnosis are the real cause

That explains Eliza Jane Scovill and Christine Maggiore.

Or not.

--
| The brighter the stupid burns, the more |
| chance that someone will see the light. |
+- D. C. Sessions -+