View Single Post
  #18  
Old April 8th 10, 05:08 AM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids,misc.kids.health,sci.med
D. C. Sessions
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 464
Default Immunization Graphs:

In message , john wrote:

http://genesgreenbook.com/resources/...phs-RO2009.pdf

Figures one (1) through eleven (11) graphically illustrate that in North
America, Europe, and the South Pacific , major declines in life-threatening
infectious diseases occurred historically either without, or far in advance
of public immunization efforts for specific diseases as listed. This
provides irrefutable evidence that vaccines are not necessary for the
effective elimination of a wide range of infectious diseases
Figures eleven (12) through twenty-four (24) graphically illustrate
that immunization is not by any means a proven and foolproof measure for
protection from various infectious disease conditions. It is often
inconsequential epidemiologically, and in some cases it is shown to actually
worsen health-care outcomes.


I love it when people flagrantly doctor the data to make up graphs.
This is one of the best, since it cherry-picks a small number of
dates to pull highs and lows of a varying list and then draws a straight
line from long before measles vaccination to long after to pretend that
there was a steady decline.

Lovely example:
http://genesgreenbook.com/content/pr...-didnt-save-us

Now, isn't that an impressive decline from before vaccination?
Only one problem -- a whole bunch of dates are deleted between
1935 and 1947 and between 1947 and 1959. Careful selection can
be sooo useful, no?

Here's the original graph:
http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/...les-canada.jpg

Now, isn't it curious that someone would go to this much trouble
to lie about a subject?

--
| The brighter the stupid burns, the more |
| chance that someone will see the light. |
+- D. C. Sessions -+