The only "victim" is the child.

Unilateral decision??? It takes 2 to tango, not one.

If you dont want a child then dont have sex. Its as simple as that.

The only person here that being portrayed as a "victim" is the male, who
somehow thinks he doesnt need to be responsible after the sperm hits the egg
because its not happening in his body. There is no unilateral decision, its
was a bilaterial decision when the two consenting adults (or children as the
case may be) have sex. Thats the point of conception and point of
bilaterial decision.

All of you think its just a cut and dry situation, that if a woman has sex
with a man and pregnancy occurs then the woman somehow "post conception" is
soley responsible for the child.

You have also clumped "women" into this group of people who just have
children to trap men. Sorry, but the only one who trapped themselves was
the man who stuck his penis into a women and there was a child conceived.

Again, if you dont want children be respectful to your self and smart about
what you do.

Your "post conception unilaterial argument" is stale and quite frankly would
mean that no man would be responisble for any child born, because the mother
would have made the unilaterial decision to keep the child. Sorry, it just
doesnt fly.