On Sat, 25 Feb 2006, Kane wrote:

Doan lies. His goal is disruption not debate. Except for his not
leaving, he is a Usenet Troll focused on one ng.

Spanking is the subject of this ng.

Any parenting method that does not include CP IS about CP by it's
replacement.

And the Embry study is about a parenting method to teach children to
play in areas safely away from street traffic.

It does not include spanking, hence it is about alternatives to spanking.

Don't you just love this logic? ;-) Using this logic, since this study
doesn't include feeding your children, hence it is about alternatives to
feeding your children!

LOGIC AND THE ANTI-SPANKING ZEALOTS... ARE THEY MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE? ;-)

Doan