View Single Post
  #5  
Old September 7th 07, 12:12 AM posted to sci.environment,misc.health.alternative,talk.politics.medicine,misc.kids.health,sci.med.nursing
Coleah
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 156
Default Updated Through July ~ Merck Gardasil Reported Adverse Reactions

On Sep 6, 1:49 pm, Ilena Rose wrote:
http://ilena-rosenthal.blogspot.comh...e.blogspot.com

Just got word that these new reports were in ...haven't had time to go
over them. What does show up right away, is the range of ages in
injured ... some as young as months old ... a 77 year old man.

Anytime people have substances ... aluminum adjuvant being just one...
injected into their bloodstreams ... they are putting themselves at
some risk.

http://tinyurl.com/2gdlga

There are REPORTED adverse reactions to what they classify as HPV4
Vaccinatiaon ... the Gardasil vaccination you see promoted here as
"safe."

http://tinyurl.com/2glw25
These are the deaths reported ...

I'm sure that the Ratbags Vaccination Team will find a way to
trivialize and minimize and cast "reasonable doubt" ( like the
Quackbuster versions of Johnnie Cochran) that these over 3000 reports
have to do with anything but the vaccinations.

They do the same with breast implants and chemical induced diseases
and syndromes.

The women in my international support group continue to be told that
their injuries and illnesses could be due to anything but the
implants.

Now Coleah & Myrl are using the same verbiage to the word ... mocking
both the potential harm of aluminum accumulation in the body and the
deaths and injuries due to Gardasil. Their mutual propaganda is to
claim this is THE answer to cervical cancer, and I don't believe that
has yet to be proven.

More on all this as it unfolds ... here are the reports ... remember
that these are usually estimated to be 10% or less of those
experienced. That figure, of course, is controversial and it is
unknown precisely how many go unreported.

http://tinyurl.com/2gdlga



An informational message has an introduction,
the body and a conclusion.

Ilena's opening paragraph here introduces the subject, "Updated
Through July ~ Merck Gardasil Reported Adverse Reactions". [The
assumption is readers will be presented with material focused on the
vaccine "Gardasil" being given to young girls.]

Hmmmm.

The introduction goes on to talk about months old babies and something
about a 77 yr old man. Say what? There is a brief splattering
something about aluminum with a mention of 'Gardasil' and a couple of
links follow.

Following the introduction, readers come to the body of text (where
the advertised 'subject' is developed), which is the 'meat' of what
the message is all about Hmmmmm. Unfortunately, the readers 'meat'
consists of stuff about 'Ratbags', 'Quackbuster', 'Johnnie Cochran',
'breast implants', more 'stuff' about breast implant women and
implants, on to dropping the names of "Coleah" and "Myrl" and
'propaganda'.....but yes, yes folks!.....there is actually "1" word in the
body text about "Gardasil." Whew.

The 'conclusion' promises "More on all this as it unfolds ..."
Yo!

The reader can certainly expect MORE 'Ratbags', 'Quackbuster',
'Johnnie Cochran', 'breast implants', more 'stuff' about breast
implant women and implants, on to dropping names of "Coleah" and
"Myrl" and 'propaganda'....but oh yes, perhaps 1 word about the actual
advertised 'subject'. A quick blab about reports, a link....and there
you have it folks!

Sheesh!