On 12/3/10 9:43 AM, carole wrote:
wrote in message ...


If you actually read some of the articles it says epidemics were caused by the smallpox vaccination.

I know what it says. They could say the sky is green, but that doesn't make it so.

But they're injecting live virus into people. Why wouldn't it cause the disease its supposed to cure?

Because it is not the smallpox virus. It was cowpox, a different virus.


There has been a little inventive white washing it seems by the pharma cartel in order to promote their
vaccines as safe and efficacious.

OK, how many people got small pox last year? Throughout the world? Zero.

The disease was on the decline before vaccination apparently.

Apparently?

Well yes if you read the historical research.

No, you say "apparently." That means that's the way it looked, not the way it was.

Well yes, that is the way it looks and that is the story the the anti-vaxers are telling.
And when I say story, this is not to mean it is fiction, but that is it the version they are selling.
Whereas the vaxer story is that they stopped it.
Story means version of accounts.



Vaccination caused more cases of the disease than occurred naturally in many instances.

No, it didn't.

You seem pretty sure of it.

Yes, I am.

From what I read, I wouldn't be so certain - the jury is still out on that one.
But not only was vaccination responsible for certain outbreaks,
http://whale.to/a/smallpox77.htm#Epi...vaccinati on:

The whale to site is a horrible site when it comes to accurate info.

but in whole populations of vaccinated people smallpox would occur and kill more people than in populations
that weren't vaccinated. http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.c...l-pox-big-lie/



You need to do a little unbiased research though - because the official story as is a lot of history,
created
for public consumption, a cover story.

Go tell that to the people in the hospitals in NYC, Boston, Philly and other big cities who are in iron
lungs because of polio. You can't? Oh, gee, that disease was eliminated in the US by vaccines, too.

We're talking about smallpox.
Try and stick to the subject.

I was making another comparison that shows vaccines are effective.

You can prove it just as easy using smallpox as an example.

No, I can't. At least not scientifically. In science, data are always open to new conclusions.

That is a telling comment surely.


I have done my research. I have seen my share of infectious disease. I am glad that people are
vaccinated
against these dreadful diseases so that they don't get them anymore, or, in the case of smallpox, don't
need
to be vaccinated anymore.

The orthopaths and homeopaths could treat these diseases so that people didn't end up with permanent
disabilities.

Do, they can't. Treatment with distilled water doesn't work.

As you have had it pointed out many times, homeopathy is more than distilled water.

No, it isn't. It has no basis in science, no good evidence to support it and no mechanism that can explain
it.

But its long history of cures speaks for itself.

Yeap - no history at all of properly documented cures.

jeff