View Single Post
  #1  
Old December 31st 04, 09:36 PM
Todd Gastaldo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Dr. Sarah shrugs as little penises are ripped and sliced en masse.

This post has a happy ending....

DR. SARAH SHRUGS AS LITTLE PENISES ARE RIPPED AND SLICED EN MASSE...

British general practitioner Dr. Sarah Vaughan is *also* in effect shrugging
as ADULT VAGINAS are sliced en masse - obviously criminally - as other
crimes against babies are committed by her fellow medical doctors.



Copied to the Tendring Primary Care Trust - THINK PREVENTION! See quote
below.

The senseless adult vagina slicing is happening there in Britain along with
the crimes against babies...

Sheesh, OBs are KEEPING birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when
babies get stuck...

Please "steer" your GPs to stop OBs from doing this.

Trust inaction is harming babies and costing money.

See below...



DR. SARAH SHRUGS AS LITTLE PENISES ARE RIPPED AND SLICED EN MASSE...

I wrote:

I question Sarah's statement that it is true that circumcision
prevents
penile cancer.


Sarah replied:


That wasn't my statement. I said that it cut the risk, not that it
prevented it entirely.


To which I replied:


I didn't say you said it prevented it entirely.


British general practitioner Dr. Sarah now shrugs:

shrug We're using the word 'prevent' in a different sense, then. I
understand it as meaning that you stop something from happening
altogether, whereas you seem to have used it in this case as meaning
that circumcision prevents *some cases of* penile cancer.
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...083a7f34c85170

MINOR CORRECTION SARAH: I perceived YOU to have used the word "prevent" in
this case to mean that ripping and slicing baby penises prevents some cases
of penile cancer.

I still don't agree...

As I noted in my initial response:

According to the www.cirp.org website (no author given)...

"The American Cancer Society issued a five part advisory statement on penile
cancer in June 1999. Circumcision is not considered to be beneficial in
preventing or reducing the risk of penile cancer..."

"Abraham Wolbarst's promotional claims that circumcision prevented penile
cancer were false and mislead the medical community for decades.30
Circumcision does not prevent penile cancer..."
http://www.cirp.org/library/disease/cancer/

Sarah,

I am truly biased in this matter - but I think justifiably so.

My own penis was ripped and sliced illegally when I was an infant - most
American babies had their penises ripped and sliced illegally.

For most of my life, I had no idea that,

"One-half to one-third of the skin on the...penile shaft is sliced
off." http://www.infocirc.org/MensHlth.htm (paraphrasing Ronald Goldman,
PhD, author of Circumcision: The Hidden Trauma)

"The average circumcision cuts off what would grow into
about 12 square inches of sexually sensitive skin."
http://www.infocirc.org/MensHlth.htm (quoting Ronald Goldman, PhD, author of
Circumcision: The Hidden Trauma)

Most American babies are STILL having their penises ripped and sliced
illegally as American medicine uses the penile cancer scare tactic to stay
out of prison. (I am for pardons in advance for medical doctors for the
reason given below.)

Massive OBVIOUS child abuse is being committed by your fellow medical
doctors here in America.

Sarah, shrugging is not appropriate. Blithely saying of the penile cancer
scare tactic "It is true" and not mentioning the American medical religion's
LIES is not appropriate.

Some little boys are losing their LIVES or "just" their penises (that is
some little boys are losing ALL of the penis - not "just" the foreskin).

Rare as death and loss of penis are, they are TOTALLY unjustified when there
are NO MEDICAL INDICATIONS for the mass ripping and slicing.

Making most male infants "just" scream and writhe and bleed is also totally
unjustified when there are NO MEDICAL INDICATIONS.

The next time you think to blithely answer "It is true" in response to a
question about the penile cancer scare tactic, please also offer readers
American medicine's BALD LIES. See "Some History" below.

Anything less just perpetuates the ongoing mass child abuse here in America.

AN EXEMPTION FOR THE ANCIENT JEWISH RITUAL:

IT LEAVES MOST OF THE FORESKIN ON THE PENIS...

As I've noted, I am in favor of an exemption from the child abuse laws for
the ancient Jewish ritual that leaves most of the foreskin on the penis.

I mention this because, coincidentally, the most recent American medical lie
[2004] involves perpetuation of the falsehood that American medicine's TOTAL
foreskin amputation is the same as the ancient Jewish ritual that leaves
most of the foreskin on the penis.

No, I don't think parents who have their babies circumcised are guilty of
child abuse. Nor do I think MDs should be prosecuted. MDs should be
pardoned in advance: As med students they are TRAINED to perform obvious
felonies that are far worse than infant penis ripping and slicing.

See Bravo Jan! Do it for the babies! (Midwifery Today editor Jan
Tritten)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3067

SOME HISTORY

Back in 1987, there were NO medical indications for routine infant
circumcision - the American Academy of Pediatrics was on record three times
(1971,1975 and 1983) as having found no medical indications for routine
circumcision...

Also in 1987, a national study by nurses determined that doctors could not
agree as to whether babies feel pain. [J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs
1987;16(6):387]

In late 1987 the American Academy of Pediatrics perpetuated phony "babies
can't feel pain" neurology.

It was phony LACK OF MYELIN "babies can't feel pain" neurology. ("Lack of
myelin" is phony neurology because most of
the nervous system never becomes myelinated and unmyelinated fibers are
thought to transmit the most excruciating qualities of pain.)

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS' WORTH OF INFANT SCREAMS AGO...

I called for an end to the obvious mass child abuse and for a religious
exemption for Jews...

In January 1988, the American Academy of Pediatrics came out against all
religious exemptions.

In February 1988, the American Academy of Pediatrics came out in favor of
anonymity for perpetrators of child abuse.

In March 1988, the California Medical Association declared the "no medical
indications" surgery "an effective public health measure" - thereby
overriding the CMA Scientific Board which had just months previous squashed
a nearly identical resolution.

In 2000, the American Academy of Pediatrics FINALLY acknowledged that babies
can feel pain.

But AAP cited a study which *repeated* the phony "lack of myelin neurology -
this time to explain why babies resist being strapped down spread-eagled.
(Ostensibly, lack of myelin makes babies stiff - but no explanation was
given for the fact that babies are not stiff when they are sleeping -
which - incidentally - is said to be the reason many circs were begun when
babies slept.)

As indicated above, recently, the American Academy of Pediatrics perpetuated
the fraud that the
American medical religion's TOTAL foreskin amputation procedure is the same
as the ancient Jewish procedure that leaves most of the foreskin on the
penis.

See Pediatrician 'ethics' (Attn: Gesundheit et al.)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2908

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo


PS1 Sarah, a medical doctor shrugging as infant penises are ripped and
sliced en masse is pretty bad, IMO.

MDs over here in America are getting some further help in committing their
massive child abuse crime - from a SEEMINGLY unlikely source...

See NO CIRC voted for circumcision! (Is Jan Tritten the Marilyn Milos of
Midwifery?)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3102

PS2 I indicated above that you are also in effect shrugging as ADULT
VAGINAS are sliced en masse - obviously criminally - as other crimes against
babies are committed by her fellow medical doctors.

When I pointed out you were ignoring the obvious OB lies, you initially
indicated that there was nothing you could do - you are a GP.

Now I see where one of your fellow British GPs is advising a first-time
mother against a homebirth because she is a first-time mother!
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...546939bfe62973

Given your comment that you couldn't do anything because you are not an OB,
I thought British GPs had nothing whatsoever to do with birth.

I thought it a typo when this woman's husband said she was booking with a
GP.
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...f8120c928afccb

Is it routine for pregnant women in Britain to book with a GP?

Sarah, it seems to me that British GPs could have a HUGE effect on birth
position - esp.if given The Four OB Lies!

When I again pointed out that you were ignoring obvious OBs lies, you blamed
my long posts (fair enough)...

You wrote:

"No ****, Sherlock. Remember me mentioning that I feel your posts get
very long to the point where the important bits in what you're saying
tend to get lost/obscured? I wasn't kidding. As a veteran of many,
many debates that have turned nasty in one way or another, I can
genuinely sympathise if you've had to put up with lying opponents."

Strangely though Sarah, you indicated that exposing the obstetrician
lies "wouldn't make a difference in anyone's birthing position," as in,

"I'm just not sympathetic enough to spend hours going through lengthy posts
working out who said or did what and what the truth of it all was in
order to comment. That wouldn't make a difference to anyone's birthing
Position..."
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/.../msg/c169babf0...

(Some of the text above appeared in a previous post...Biased British GPs?
Cyworks/nhsFamilyChoice to help babies?
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3096)

Sarah, you are STILL ignoring obvious medical doctor lies.

People - particularly young medical doctors - are loathe to help expose huge
lies.

If you don't want to do anything about the mass child abuse and mass adult
abuse (sometimes fatal), then just don't post.

Just hang out here with the ladies.

I will respect that.

But flip me off with another "No **** Sherlock" - and I will want to play
some more. : )

As you might have noticed, my game is simply ending a serious LIFE-AND-DEATH
grisly medical game - for moms and the little ones inside them.

OBs themselves have indicated that closing birth canals FAR LESS than 30%
can KILL.

Sheesh Sarah, your fellow medical doctors are KEEPING birth canals closed
the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck.

As I wrote to Olivia Gordon of "Cyworks/nhsFamilyChoice":

I'm biased...

Trained as a doctor of chiropractic, I cringe at the grisly spectacle of
obstetricians pulling on tiny spines with hands, forceps or vacuums * with
birth canals closed up to 30% - sometimes pulling so hard that spinal nerves
are ripped out of tiny spinal cords...

HOW can I stop this grisly obstetric travesty?

I keep thinking...

THE TENDRING PRIMARY CARE TRUST (PCT) "STEERS THE WORK OF GP PRACTICES..."


"The NHS spends public money - your money - on health care,
treatment and **prevention**...Tendring Primary Care Trust [PCT] aims to
deliver
better and more
responsive health services to improve the health of people in
your area. The Trust holds the NHS budget for our local
population of 139,000 people. It steers the work of GP
practices..."
http://www.essex.nhs.uk/documents/gu...ring%20pct.pdf


Sarah, DO pregnant women in Britain routinely book with GPs?

If so - or regardless - maybe when your baby gets older you will ask your
fellow British GPs to help stop the grisly travesties?

Maybe you will ask the Tendring Primary Care Trust to "steer" GPs into
stopping OBs?

I hope so.

I'll copy this to the following personnel at Tendring Primary Care Trust
(PCT):


David Rex Chairman
Paul Unsworth Chief Executive
Sarah Gallone Complaints and Education Manager
Jan Chittock Child Protection Administrative Assistant


via Catherine Morgan
Communications Manager
Tendring Primary Care Trust
Canarvon House
Canarvon Road
Clacton-on-Sea
Essex
CO15 6QD
tel: 01255 206067



A few last notes...

As usual, I am in favor of pardons in advance for medical doctors. As med
students medical doctors are TRAINED to perform obvious felonies.

Sarah, when you watched "lots" of semisitting deliveries, you watched lots
of birth canals being closed up to 30%.

Perhaps you also watched OBs KEEPING birth canals closed when babies get
stuck - keeping women semisitting or dorsal as they pulled with hands,
forceps or vacuums?

Sheesh, I can't believe it's still happening.

Sincerely,

Todd ("Sherlock")

Dr. Gastaldo


PS It's snowing here in Oregon! Hooray! Happy New Year everyone!

Now where did I leave my sled? : )