"Gini" wrote in message
news:h0w2i.7112$vu2.3195@trndny01...

"teachrmama" wrote
............

YES!! It IS guessing! Perhaps dad wanted more time with the kid anyway,
but knew NOTHING about shared parenting. Perhaps when girlfriend said
"My ex an I have a shared parenting plan. It saves him a bundle on child
support, and we both get time with the kids," he said "Wow. Shared
parenting. Tell me about it." And she did. And she also said "And
you'd save money, because you wouldn't have to pay for child care. I
could watch the kid." And he said "Wow! Sounds like a win-win
situation. I'll try it." And the judge agreed. You can't say that just
because A suggested to B that he'd save money, that is his sole
motivation. Unless he came to you in person and said "I'm going for
shared parenting JUST to save money." Did he?
===
Might as well save your breath. He took his ball and went home--Said we
didn't play nice.

Another one who wants everyone to agree with him, it seems. Has he never
made a decision based on a number of factors, rather than just one factor?
Is that why he insists that the guy in his story wanted shared custody ONLY
to save money? Oh, well No great loss, if all he is going to do is ask our
opinions, then rail on us when we don't give back HIS opinion as our own.