View Single Post
  #7  
Old April 28th 05, 06:31 PM
Todd Gastaldo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

THE 30% AND CHIROPODY (NOW CALLED PODIATRY)

See below.

"Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message
...
Who is humorously making light?

I am talking about the chiropodist on America's Most Wanted ....


LOL!

And now I am talking about Margaret the chiropodist in "Bob and Margaret"
(Comedy) which airs: Sundays 11:30 PM (Comedy Central):

"Premise: The funny, but everyday dealings of Bob, a neurotic dentist, and
his chiropodist wife, Margaret."
http://tv.zap2it.com/tveditorial/tve_main/1,1002,273|3244|1|,00.html

BTW, I'm pretty sure chiropodists are now called podiatrists.

Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary says:

"Chiropodical...pertaining to chiropody (now called podiatry)."

Incidentally, when I persuaded Dorland's to correct its definition of
chiropractic and include graduates of chiropractic colleges under the
Dorland's definition of doctor, Dorland's took the opportunity to also
include graduates dental and podiatry colleges.

I see your point, Joel - offering some humor does not necessarily make light
of the mass child abuse being committed by OBs.

Indeed, humorous posts in response to mine could possibly help call
attention to the fact that OBs are routinely closing birth canals up to 30%
and routinely keeping birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies
get stuck - as they pull with hands, forceps or vacuums - sometimes so hard
that spinal nerves are ripped out of tiny spinal cords.

I suspect Amy's joking about OBs not really robbing babies of up to 50% of
their blood volume helped call people's attention to the fact that OBs *are*
really robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume.

Todd

PS For readers who may not be aware (perhaps Joel the dentist is still not
aware): "Chiro" is a term often used by chiropractors when referring to a
chiropractor or to chiropractic. I suppose chiropodists used to use the
same term; but now they are called podiatrists ("pods"?)...


"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message
. net...
FOR CHIROS ONLY: SPEAKING OF STRICTLY SPEAKING...


Yo Toddster,

What do chiropodists have to do with opening birth canals 30%?


"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message
k.net...
OB PERPS

Dentist Joel M. Eichen humorously makes light of massive child abuse by

OBs.


"Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message
...

"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message
k.net...

?


As fetuses, chiropodists (just like everyone else) are used as
entering
wedges to open birth canals up to 30% - assuming they are born

vaginally
and
their mothers aren't placed semisitting or dorsal.

Todd


REPLY

WoW!

Chiropodists entering wedges ........ I think I saw that
on America's Most Wanted .......... they are after that guy in 23
states
......


Joel,

It's a classic case of blaming the victim as the birth-canal-closing OB
perps remain at large.

OB perps are also robbing babies of up to 50% of blood volume. See
below.

THE FOUR OB LIES

OB LIE #1. After MASSIVE change in the AP pelvic outlet diameter was
clinically demonstrated in 1911 and radiographically demonstrated in
1957,
the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that pelvic
diamaters DON'T CHANGE at delivery.

OB LIE #2. After Ohlsen pointed out in 1973 that pelvic diameters DO
change - the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming

that
their most frequent delivery position - dorsal - widens the outlet.

OB LIE #3. After I pointed out in 1992 that dorsal CLOSES - and so does
semisitting - the authors of Williams Obstetrics - put the correct
biomechanics in their 1993 edition - but kept in their text (in the same
paragraph!) - the dorsal widens bald lie that first called my attention
to
their text...

OB LIE #4. OBs are actually KEEPING birth canals closed when babies get
stuck - and claiming they are doing everything to allow the birth canal

open
maximally. (ACOG Shoulder Dystocia video - also forceps and vacuum births
are performed with the mother in lithotomy.)

See Make birth better: Dan Rather, before you leave CBS...
http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2983

I noted some of the OB lies in an Open Letter to the FTC years ago...
http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/*part2ftc.html


RELEVANT AMA PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS....

"[AMA physician[s] shall...strive to expose those physicians...who engage

in
fraud or deception."

"[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...seek changes in those requirements which are
contrary to the best interests of the patient."

"[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...make relevant information available to

patients,
colleagues, and the public..."
http://www.psych.org/psych_pra*ct/et...ions53101*.cfm

AMA physicians are ignoring their own stated ethics - babies be damned.


MASSIVE BABY BLOOD ROBBERY

Retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG
indicates that OBs are robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume.

This is happening to EVERY CESAREAN BABY, according to Dr. Morley:

"ACOG's routine treatment (B138) of these depressed neonates is immediate
cord clamping to obtain cord blood pH studies. The child's only

functioning
source of oxygen - the placenta - is amputated together with 30% to 50+%

of
its natural blood volume. Total asphyxia is imposed until the lungs
function, and the depressed (asphyxiated, hypovolemic) child starts its
extra-uterine life in hypovolemic shock... B138 was first published in

1993.
Every cesarean section baby, every depressed child, every premie, and

every
child born with a neonatal team in
the delivery room has its cord clamped immediately to facilitate the
panicked rush to the resuscitation table. The current epidemic of

immediate
cord clamping coincides with an epidemic of autism...For the trial

lawyers,
it is essential that the 'true genesis' of cerebral
palsy remains unknown, because that 'true genesis' (B.138) is a standard

of
medico-legal care..."
http://www.cordclamping.com/ac***og-cp.htm

In cases where the baby MUST be
resuscitated after birth - I am still wondering why pediatricians have to
sever the baby's access to blood and oxygen and rush baby across the room

to
resuscitate. Why can't neonatal resuscitation stations be designed so

that
mother and baby can be wheeled underneath (or between) with baby's
natural
oxygenation/transfusion device still intact? No one has answered this
question.


My thanks to Canadian Grandmother Donna Young for calling my attention to
the immediate cord clamping mass child abuse.

A GOOD SIGN: Oregon Health & Science University/OHSU - Oregon's only
medical school - stopped promoting immediate cord clamping and
birth-canal-closing/semisitting delivery online
after I complained.

OHSU's link to the misinformation is now dead - or rather - one is

re-routed
to
www.ohsuwomenshealth.com...

See Birth child abuse: Oregon's only medical school (OHSU)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2986

(If anyone can find a page where OHSU is still promoting immediate cord
clamping and birth-canal-closing/semisitting delivery, I would like to

know
about it.)


PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBs are closing
birth canals up to 30%. Also, when babies get stuck, OBs KEEP women
semisitting and dorsal - they KEEP the birth canal closed the "extra" up

to
30% as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums. ANOTHER PROBLEM: By
immediately clamping cords, OBs are temporarily asphyxiating babies and
robbing them of up to 50%
of their blood volume - see the astonishing quote from Dr. Morley above.

THE SOLUTION:

1. To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%,
simply roll onto your side as you push your baby out - BUT BEWARE - some

OBs
will let pregnant women "try" alternative delivery positions - but will

roll
them back to semisitting/dorsal - close their birth canals the "extra" up

to
30% for the actual delivery. Talk to your OB.

2. To allow your baby to have the "extra" up to 50% of blood volume, do

not
let the OB or midwife clamp the umbilical cord until it has stopped
pulsating and your baby is pink and breathing and not in need of
resuscitation.

NOTE #1: Allowing the birth canal to open the "extra" up to 30% will not
prevent all episiotomies or c-sections or forceps/vacuum use - but OBs

have
no business closing
birth canals the "extra" up to 30% in the first place.

NOTE #2: There are rare cases where the OB must clamp immediately - but

they
are indeed rare. OBs are routinely clamping cords immediately -
routinely
robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. Talk to your OB
today.

I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. As medical
students MDs are TRAINED to perform obvious child abuse which sometimes
kills.

Thanks for reading everyone.

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo
Hillsboro, Oregon
USA