"Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message
...

"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message
nk.net...
THE 30% AND CHIROPODY (NOW CALLED PODIATRY)


REPLY

Actually they are different. Chiropodists are only clip and
chip while podiatrists are fully-fledged doctors!

Now which group got caught with the wedge
doing who knows what, I do not know.


I am pretty sure Chiropodists and Podiatrists are the same profession in the
US - I could be wrong though.

The British Society of Chiropodists and Podiatrists, 53 Welbeck Street,
London W1M 7HE
Telephone: 0207 486 3381 - Fax: 0207 935 6359 has this to say:

"Chiropodists and Podiatrists....Nowadays, the recognised schools are all
departments of universities, or colleges of higher education, and issue BSc
degrees in podiatry,...After graduation you will find there are almost
limitless opportunities for postgraduate study and advancement. Several
polytechnics have been running post-registration BSc degrees in chiropody
for some years..."

"The profession is in the process of changing its title from Chiropody to
Podiatry, to indicate the advances that have been made, and are still being
made, in the professional scope of practice, and to use the title that is
recognised in most other countries with similar level of education."
http://www.ca.courses-careers.com/chiropody.htm

Todd



See below.

"Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message
...
Who is humorously making light?

I am talking about the chiropodist on America's Most Wanted ....


LOL!

And now I am talking about Margaret the chiropodist in "Bob and Margaret"
(Comedy) which airs: Sundays 11:30 PM (Comedy Central):

"Premise: The funny, but everyday dealings of Bob, a neurotic dentist,
and
his chiropodist wife, Margaret."
http://tv.zap2it.com/tveditorial/tve_main/1,1002,273|3244|1|,00.html

BTW, I'm pretty sure chiropodists are now called podiatrists.

Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary says:

"Chiropodical...pertaining to chiropody (now called podiatry)."

Incidentally, when I persuaded Dorland's to correct its definition of
chiropractic and include graduates of chiropractic colleges under the
Dorland's definition of doctor, Dorland's took the opportunity to also
include graduates dental and podiatry colleges.

I see your point, Joel - offering some humor does not necessarily make
light
of the mass child abuse being committed by OBs.

Indeed, humorous posts in response to mine could possibly help call
attention to the fact that OBs are routinely closing birth canals up to
30%
and routinely keeping birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when
babies
get stuck - as they pull with hands, forceps or vacuums - sometimes so
hard
that spinal nerves are ripped out of tiny spinal cords.

I suspect Amy's joking about OBs not really robbing babies of up to 50%
of
their blood volume helped call people's attention to the fact that OBs
*are*
really robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume.

Todd

PS For readers who may not be aware (perhaps Joel the dentist is still
not
aware): "Chiro" is a term often used by chiropractors when referring to
a
chiropractor or to chiropractic. I suppose chiropodists used to use the
same term; but now they are called podiatrists ("pods"?)...


"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message
. net...
FOR CHIROS ONLY: SPEAKING OF STRICTLY SPEAKING...

Yo Toddster,

What do chiropodists have to do with opening birth canals 30%?


"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message
k.net...
OB PERPS

Dentist Joel M. Eichen humorously makes light of massive child abuse
by
OBs.


"Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message
...

"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message
k.net...

?


As fetuses, chiropodists (just like everyone else) are used as
entering
wedges to open birth canals up to 30% - assuming they are born
vaginally
and
their mothers aren't placed semisitting or dorsal.

Todd


REPLY

WoW!

Chiropodists entering wedges ........ I think I saw that
on America's Most Wanted .......... they are after that guy in 23
states
......


Joel,

It's a classic case of blaming the victim as the birth-canal-closing
OB
perps remain at large.

OB perps are also robbing babies of up to 50% of blood volume. See
below.

THE FOUR OB LIES

OB LIE #1. After MASSIVE change in the AP pelvic outlet diameter was
clinically demonstrated in 1911 and radiographically demonstrated in
1957,
the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that
pelvic
diamaters DON'T CHANGE at delivery.

OB LIE #2. After Ohlsen pointed out in 1973 that pelvic diameters DO
change - the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming
that
their most frequent delivery position - dorsal - widens the outlet.

OB LIE #3. After I pointed out in 1992 that dorsal CLOSES - and so
does
semisitting - the authors of Williams Obstetrics - put the correct
biomechanics in their 1993 edition - but kept in their text (in the
same
paragraph!) - the dorsal widens bald lie that first called my
attention
to
their text...

OB LIE #4. OBs are actually KEEPING birth canals closed when babies
get
stuck - and claiming they are doing everything to allow the birth
canal
open
maximally. (ACOG Shoulder Dystocia video - also forceps and vacuum
births
are performed with the mother in lithotomy.)

See Make birth better: Dan Rather, before you leave CBS...
http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2983

I noted some of the OB lies in an Open Letter to the FTC years ago...
http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/*part2ftc.html


RELEVANT AMA PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS....

"[AMA physician[s] shall...strive to expose those physicians...who
engage
in
fraud or deception."

"[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...seek changes in those requirements which
are
contrary to the best interests of the patient."

"[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...make relevant information available to
patients,
colleagues, and the public..."
http://www.psych.org/psych_pra*ct/et...ions53101*.cfm

AMA physicians are ignoring their own stated ethics - babies be
damned.


MASSIVE BABY BLOOD ROBBERY

Retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG
indicates that OBs are robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood
volume.

This is happening to EVERY CESAREAN BABY, according to Dr. Morley:

"ACOG's routine treatment (B138) of these depressed neonates is
immediate
cord clamping to obtain cord blood pH studies. The child's only
functioning
source of oxygen - the placenta - is amputated together with 30% to
50+%
of
its natural blood volume. Total asphyxia is imposed until the lungs
function, and the depressed (asphyxiated, hypovolemic) child starts
its
extra-uterine life in hypovolemic shock... B138 was first published in
1993.
Every cesarean section baby, every depressed child, every premie, and
every
child born with a neonatal team in
the delivery room has its cord clamped immediately to facilitate the
panicked rush to the resuscitation table. The current epidemic of
immediate
cord clamping coincides with an epidemic of autism...For the trial
lawyers,
it is essential that the 'true genesis' of cerebral
palsy remains unknown, because that 'true genesis' (B.138) is a
standard
of
medico-legal care..."
http://www.cordclamping.com/ac***og-cp.htm

In cases where the baby MUST be
resuscitated after birth - I am still wondering why pediatricians have
to
sever the baby's access to blood and oxygen and rush baby across the
room
to
resuscitate. Why can't neonatal resuscitation stations be designed so
that
mother and baby can be wheeled underneath (or between) with baby's
natural
oxygenation/transfusion device still intact? No one has answered this
question.


My thanks to Canadian Grandmother Donna Young for calling my attention
to
the immediate cord clamping mass child abuse.

A GOOD SIGN: Oregon Health & Science University/OHSU - Oregon's only
medical school - stopped promoting immediate cord clamping and
birth-canal-closing/semisitting delivery online
after I complained.

OHSU's link to the misinformation is now dead - or rather - one is
re-routed
to
www.ohsuwomenshealth.com...

See Birth child abuse: Oregon's only medical school (OHSU)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2986

(If anyone can find a page where OHSU is still promoting immediate
cord
clamping and birth-canal-closing/semisitting delivery, I would like to
know
about it.)


PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBs are
closing
birth canals up to 30%. Also, when babies get stuck, OBs KEEP women
semisitting and dorsal - they KEEP the birth canal closed the "extra"
up
to
30% as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums. ANOTHER PROBLEM: By
immediately clamping cords, OBs are temporarily asphyxiating babies
and
robbing them of up to 50%
of their blood volume - see the astonishing quote from Dr. Morley
above.

THE SOLUTION:

1. To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%,
simply roll onto your side as you push your baby out - BUT BEWARE -
some
OBs
will let pregnant women "try" alternative delivery positions - but
will
roll
them back to semisitting/dorsal - close their birth canals the "extra"
up
to
30% for the actual delivery. Talk to your OB.

2. To allow your baby to have the "extra" up to 50% of blood volume,
do
not
let the OB or midwife clamp the umbilical cord until it has stopped
pulsating and your baby is pink and breathing and not in need of
resuscitation.

NOTE #1: Allowing the birth canal to open the "extra" up to 30% will
not
prevent all episiotomies or c-sections or forceps/vacuum use - but OBs
have
no business closing
birth canals the "extra" up to 30% in the first place.

NOTE #2: There are rare cases where the OB must clamp immediately -
but
they
are indeed rare. OBs are routinely clamping cords immediately -
routinely
robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. Talk to your OB
today.

I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. As medical
students MDs are TRAINED to perform obvious child abuse which
sometimes
kills.

Thanks for reading everyone.

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo
Hillsboro, Oregon
USA