"Dusty" ) writes:
"Andre Lieven" wrote in message
...
"teachrmama" )accurately points out:
"tonita" whined in message
oups.com...
Well, I wouldn't consider that an ideal start for a newborn to be
schlepped back and forth. All babies need their mommies. Daddies
perform different roles even though most people today disagree.
Everyone wants to change human nature. But yes, both parents should
have equal rights but you can't cut a child in half.

Maybe, Tonita, having to share a newborn with a father who lived in a
different household would wake the woman up and make her realize how
precious that young life is. The woman does not have a "right" to the
infant! Any more than she has a "right" to a percentage of a man's
paycheck. Maybe if both men and women faced inconvenience and lack of
time
with the child, both genders would begin to realize that they need to be
more responsible in their choices. Right now, men lose out on both time
with the child (which can never be recovered) and $$ from their
paychecks.
Women have the privilege of having their child with them and get $$ from
the father's paycheck. THE CHILD needs BOTH parents. THE CHILD does
not need either one more than the other. If we are truly thinking about
the child, let's make sure the child gets what he really needs--2
parents. And let each parent pay their own way!

Two words: Damn. Straight.

Apparently, "tonita" doesn't get it wrt equal rights and equal
*responsibilities*...

Oh come now, Andre. Of course Tonita gets the idea of equal rights and
responsibilities - so long as Mommy gets the rights and Daddy gets all the
responsibility, that's equal.

Exactly. That is proof of her sexism and misandry. Not to mention her
INability to face the fact that both are busted.

" Men are people, too ? " gasped the surprised and irritated
WomenFirster bigot.

Andre