View Single Post
  #3  
Old October 31st 07, 12:35 PM posted to misc.health.alternative,talk.politics.medicine,misc.kids.health
JOHN
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 583
Default The Assault On Medical Freedom / Excellent expose on earlier Quackwatch / NCAHF Operations


"Peter Moran" pmoranATinternode.on.net wrote in message
...

Etc. Words, words. Note no attempt to discuss any of the specific
matters that the American Medical Association and most other medical
organistaions throughout the world have taken a stand on (cancer quackery
of many types, homeopathy, spinal manipulation to treat and prevent
diseases of other bodily organs, etc) If those whining about supposed
assaults on health freedom ever got down to specifics, they would be
forced to justify a wide variety of serious quackery, and some pretty
dumb medical ideas.


Allopathy is mostly quackery, and it compounds the crime by suppressing
non-allopathic med that does cure eg Vitamin C for infections
http://www.whale.to/a/levy4.html

Not to mention dozens of cancer therapies
http://www.whale.to/a/cancer_c.html

the only stand the AMA has taken is to stand on the truth

So, readers, where has the AMA gone wrong? None of the cancer quacks
mentioned by the now-disbanded AMA committee on questionable cancer
treatments ever showed that they were able to cure patients with
established cancer, as claimed. Not Gerson, not Hoxsey, not Kelley, not
Livingstone-Wheeler, not the promoters of Laetrile, nor Hoffer, nor
Revici. In fact we now know for certain that most of these things don't
work as they are still often claimed to from an examination of these
persons' own records. See
http://www.users.on.net/~pmoran/canc...ve_studies.htm


Lies. It is absurd that anyone would believe allopathic medicine was the
only one of any merit. Toxic drugs and radiation? Absurd. It just shows
how brainwashed people are that you can say cancer causing drugs and
radiation are the only therapies of merit without shame.

"An examination of the 62 random cases shows that our success rate has been
82 percent. Considering the patients we called inconclusive but for whom we
were able to be of some help, it is over 90 percent. "---Virginia Livingston
Wheeler M.D. (The Conquest of Cancer: Vaccines and Diet p.18, 19)