"Gini52" wrote in message
...
In article , Cameron Stevens
says...
Supporting the mother *is* supporting the child. I know what you mean but
there's no sane or reasonable way to enforce this.
=====
Of course there is. Our government requires us to maintain receipts for
all tax
deductions for, what--7 years? We call it insane and unreasonable but the
government has no problem requiring us to do it. There is no reason a CP
should
not be subject to audit if there is reason to believe CS is being misused.
All
she needs to do is keep a shoebox for receipts should there be a question.
This
would not apply however, if the amount ordered is in line with the actual
reasonable costs of a child. In that case, there is little room for
"discretionary spending."
==

I agree with the principle and I know this will be a challenge for those
people who are especially challenged to budget or manage their money.

Cameron