On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:29:48 -0400, nobody wrote:

That part of the country is predominately Catholic or very Catholic -
So the girls may be raised Catholic.

There's no direct evidence that *any* of the girls were Catholic.

Why do you ignore the evidence?

There is no evidence. That's the problem.

Jonezie is well known to ignore the lack of evidence.



Do you have any "direct evidence" proving that none of the girls are Catholic?

cue crickets chirping

The last refuge of the liberal loon.

Jonezie is a proud Communist.

The claim that was made that
they were Catholic. You, rather than support the claim, demand that I
prove it's not so. If you can't support the original claim, then just
say so.

He's never been able to support any claim he's ever made.
Seriously. He's only tried once that I know of, and he failed.
He claimed a woman who killed her baby was a Christian. His proof
was screen caps of a MySpace page for a woman with the same first and
last name, but living in a different state, claiming to be a
Christian.
Since then, he's only stated claim X has been proved, or, as
above, he demands someone prove him wrong (which happens a lot).



Jonezie:
Or you could discuss the holocaust of Native Americans by
the invading White Man ...


Deadrat:
Sure. I for Indian or N for Native?

Jonezie:
S for Savage.

Prof. Jonez expressing his racial HATE for Native Americans.
Message-ID: