View Single Post
  #20  
Old February 3rd 06, 12:17 AM posted to alt.child-support
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Update on Mother with 14 children


"Phil #3" wrote in message ink.net...

"Moon Shyne" wrote in message ...

"Phil #3" wrote in message k.net...

"Moon Shyne" wrote in message ...

"Phil #3" wrote in message .net...

"Moon Shyne" wrote in message ...

"Phil #3" wrote in message nk.net...

"Moon Shyne" wrote in message ...
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/nati...en-Beaten.html

''We looked at all the facts, and the facts at this point do not point to what was first being alleged,''
prosecutor Bob Donohoo said."


"Moon Shyne" wrote in message ...
http://www.jsonline.com/news/metro/jan06/389054.asp

"A mother arrested last week on allegations that she beat three of her children so brutally that they sought
refuge in an abandoned home was released from jail Tuesday without being charged.

Milwaukee police accounts of the situation were grossly inaccurate, Nina Parker said in an interview Tuesday
evening, hours after her release."



Still no word about the father as in how many, who or where they (he) might be, how much support they (he) are
or are not paying?

Why does that matter? This is a woman who worked double shifts on occasion, to support her family. Bob
Whiteside, and others, tried to slam this woman as some sort of abusive welfare queen. I've tried to show that
their unfounded accusations are precisely that - unfounded.

Perhaps the father simply abandoned, who knows?

Phil #3


She's doing somethig better than a father working two jobs to pay child support... how, exactly?

Who said she did anything better than anyone else? Certainly not me.

If you really think this single mother working two jobs is fully and solely supporting 14, soon to be 15,
children, can I interest you in some oceanfront property in Nebraska?

Try reading the article. She doesn't have 14 children, and she's not pregnant.


http://www.nytimes.com/glogin?URI=ht...FXiQ2FJQ25FiAc
"A woman who was arrested after police found three of her 14 children..."
Ok, so she didn't have 14 children, she had 14 children. I got it now.
(Is that some form of feminstimath?)
Phil #3


http://www.jsonline.com/news/metro/jan06/389054.asp

Parker said the inaccuracies included the number of children she has (11, not 14), which of her children were found
in the so-called "safe house" and that she is pregnant, which she denies.



Why are you defending this woman?


I'm not defending the woman, per se - I'm defending people at least sticking to the truth.

I can tell the difference - can you?

Phil #3