On Nov 14, 8:19 pm, "Chris" wrote:
--
[Any man that's good enough to support a child is good enough to have
custody of such child]"teachrmama" wrote in message

...







"Chris" wrote in message
...

--
[Any man that's good enough to support a child is good enough to have
custody of such child]
"Sarah Gray" wrote in message
.. .
Chris wrote:
"Sarah Gray" wrote in message
y.net...
Chris wrote:
"Sarah Gray" wrote in message
.. .
Chris wrote:
The thing is, it's for *his daughter*, not for me.

Uhuh.

*I* don't need anyone supporting me,

Umm, it's more like greed, not need.

It is not greed to insist her father provide for her.

Nice twist. It is GREED to insist that he give you FREE MONEY.

He has no way of providing for her commensurate to how I do without
either sending money, or paying in full for certain expenses on his
own.

His obligation to you and your daughter is exactly SQUAT!

your opinion.

How about his obligation to HIS daughter?

What part of SQUAT did you not understand; the "SQ" or the "UAT"?



- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -