View Single Post
  #11  
Old April 16th 09, 12:43 AM posted to alt.child-support,alt.politics.economics,alt.politics.usa.constitution
DB[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 266
Default MA - Outrageous Injustice

The government is more of a threat to the American Male than any terrorist
group is!

"Kenneth S." wrote in message
...
On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:35:33 -0700, "DB" wrote:


"Peter Franks" wrote in message
...
DB wrote:
When the government starts to imprison it's citizens over money issues,
it's time for a new government!

Incarceration should be reserved largely for the purposes of segregating
those that have demonstrated a tendency to maliciously and violently
harm
society.


Quite right, this is an abuse of authority! No judge in this land should
be
allowed to impute a set income when a Father has lost his job thru no
fault
of his own. America should be embarrassed about preaching freedom and
liberty for all to other nations when it imprisons it's own citizens for
minor money matters.

Hell, they sure don't imprison the scumbags on Wall Street when they stole
all the money that we will have to pay back. Not only did they get rich,
they also got rewarded with more money from the same government that puts
a
man in jail for not having the ability to support his kids!


I think it's a mistake to accept -- even in the interests of
keeping comments brief -- the notion that "child support" goes to
support kids.

"Child support" is money that the noncustodial parent
(virtually always the father) owes to the custodial parent, and she is
under no obligation to spend any of it on the children. Furthermore,
there is plenty of evidence that state "child support" formulas are
rigged to maximize the amount of money going to the mother.

The truth is that men go to jail for not having the ability to
pay money to their exes. Divorce industry participants disingenuously
try to conceal this by saying that the money is owed to the children.