"Suzanne" wrote in message
...
There are a lot of vague references to said charters and "reporting people
for spam", but not one person yet has yet posted a link. Any of ya
actually got one? tick tick tick.... TIME'S UP

Do a search for Usenet guidelines. You're smart, you invented a breastpump,
I'm sure you know how to use Google.

tick tick tick...TIMES UP You lose.

What I see is a lot of brow beating of a guy who posts pregnancy and
breastfeeding related articles, and JUST because he's a friend to me he
also chooses to include a link to a great breastfeeding related product -
namely the breast pump I patented.

Nobody gives a **** who you are. We aren't hounding Ed because he's your
friend. We aren't hounding Ed because he's a guy. We're hounding Ed
because he's advertising on a Usenet newsgroup. After we specifically told
him that it wasn't allowed.

I'll tell you this -- when I needed a breast pump like this one, there was
no such thing. Knowing how badly I needed it, and how my situation was
certainly not unique from other mothers, I made it happen. And I did that
as much for the betterment of the lives of other mothers than for anything
else.

That's nice. Good for you. I hope you sell a lot of your pumps. But not
here. Go buy advertising like a real company, and stop trying to get
something for free from a place where advertising is not allowed nor
acceptable. This is not an acceptable place to post your ads. While we may
seem like a ripe pool of potential customers, it is not acceptable to
advertise her.

Nobody here seems to object to all the vioxx, celebrex, fako Rolex
watches, and other garbage going on here that truly IS spam.

So tell me, why is that? Why don't any of you object to that?

I'm going to type this really slowly, Suzanne, so pay close attention.
Because those ads are posted by spambots. Replying to them is futile. You,
and your dear clone Ed, are real people. The rules of the group have been
explained to you, both in simple terms and in very clear terms. And both of
you continue to flaunt the rules and norms of this group, despite the loud
protests of the members of the group, and advertise your product.

I can tell you from personally knowing Ed, that he is absolutely terrific
around kids, and he does indeed care a lot about the welfare of babies as
well as their mothers.

That's nice.

He is doing a favor to you and any mother interested by making you aware
of a great product that makes mothers' lives easier. If you're not
interested, then fine, skip to the next topic heading you are interested
in -- just like all the vioxx and Rolex ads you skip over without
following up on ad nauseum.

No, he is not doing me a favor. He would do me, and many of the women of
this newsgroup a favor if he went away like we asked him to. Instead, he
continues to advertise your product, and then you come over to defend your
clone and continue to advertise your product. Do us a favor, go away.

But you seem to be oblivious to the fact that your following up to Ed's
posts indicates to me that you ARE interested in what Ed has to say,
whether or not you like to admit it or not. But how transparent can you
be? Do I smell envy that you aren't also connected with such a great
product for mothers?

No. This isn't envy. This is anger. Anger that you're clouding up a great
group with your bull**** arguments about why you should be able to post your
crap advertisements here. Regardless of what we say, you continue. You are
rude, and I would not recommend your product to anyone. In fact, I would
recommend against it, to anyone. Repeatedly.

Didn't you know -- You can be.
;-)

Those of you also interested in a work at home opportunity so you can be
with your kids can contact me.

The rest of you can.... skip it!!

Suzanne.

I wouldn't work for a sleaze like you if it was the last job on earth. And
I wouldn't buy a product from a sleaze like you, nor would I tell anyone
else about it, except to tell them what a couple of sleazey people run the
company, and how rude they are to totally disregard the Usenet FAQ and
member wishes.
--

Jamie Clark