Jane wrote
Well, Kane, you've convinced me. I have never
spanked my children in the past, but you have
done such a horrible job of arguing against
it, that I have decided to try it.

ROFL Rolling On Floor Laughing hysterically!

Jane: I supported you in your choice before,
and if you change that now.

Kane represents the rabid side of anti-spanking.

To me, only half of the issue regarding spanking
is the scientific merits. (Weak or inconclusive)

The other half is rooted in concern about people
(like Kane) militantly pushing their views and
deceiving lawmakers into passing laws removing
parents CHOICE.

As a pro-spanker I respect your choice not to,
but I am very leery of people like Kane who
are anti-spanking and zealots about it.

Until there is irrefutable and convincing
evidence, (No more Sweden or UN garbage)
it all comes down to the parent making their
OWN choice.

Personally I think being against spanking is
fine, but that no parent should ever be told
they must never under any circumstances spank.
In other words, "never say never".

Kane and LaVonne represent a sort of
socialist totalitarianism that would remove
perogative and choice, replacing it with
bureaucratic absolutism.