Ilena Rose wrote:
In a very, very rare moment of honesty, Gardasil Promoter / Apologist
Coleah Penley Ayers declares:
www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/
I'm a bit confused.
The vaccine is intended as a preventative measure before females become sexually active. It is not supposed to be a cure for pre-existing lesions. So I don't get the emphasis on 'reductions of different stage lesions'.
She however, is as usual, vastly UNDER stating her confusion.
I have not seen any signs that Coleah is confused.
Confusion is the devil's tool ... one she uses frequently as a usenet
flack.
Pot, meet kettle.
True, the drug is "intended" to be preventative ... however, what is
not known is the effect it will have short term on those already
infected. Merck is marketing to women up to 26 ... probably most not
"pre-sexually active."
The vaccine was studied in women who were already infected with HPV.
When the studies looking at the efficacy of the vaccine were done, the
girls and young women were tested to see if they were already positive
for any of the strains of HPV that were in the vaccine. Some of them
were. There was no mention of any more adverse reactions in these young
women compared to those who had not previously been exposed to HPV.
There is no reason to believe that previous exposure to HPV puts any
women at risk from the vaccine.
http://cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/rr/rr5602.pdf
Further, it is not known how long it even works when it does work ...
and how many "boosters" will be required.
It is known that the vaccine provides protection for at least five years.
http://cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/rr/rr5602.pdf
The accumulation of aluminum (each jab has 225 mcg of aluminum
adjuvant) has NOT been addressed and although Coleah disinforms the
public that there are no dangers with this accumulation ... it's just
more propaganda she spreads.
Please cite some good references that show that 1) the 0.225 mg of
aluminum in the vaccine actually accumulate in the body, rather than be
excreted; and 2) that this accumulation is harmful.
Minimizing the risks is an important disinformation scheme ... and
Coleah barks it precisely:
Maximizing the risks of vaccines is an important disinformation scheme.
You bark it so well.
"So what is the big scary point? "
Plenty.
You're right. Confusion is the devil's tool. And you wield it well, too.
The correct answer to the question: "So what is the big scary point?" is
that young and middle-aged ladies will die of a preventable disease.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.hbci.com/~wenonah/hydro/al.htm
Here is a list of over 2500 adverse reports made after Gardasil
injections (each containing 225 mcg of aluminum adjuvant)
http://tinyurl.com/2enev2
The vast majority of which are things like swelling and soreness at the
injection site.
There are also marked lapses in the information about Merck's use of
aluminum adjuvant in its 'placebo' that might have skewed their
published results.
The use of aluminum adjuvant in its placebo groups was mentioned he
http://cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/rr/rr5602.pdf. The CDC was obviously well aware
of it and took it into account.
Info on that is he
http://www.909shot.com/PressReleases...06gardasil.htm
To view the VAERS list of over 1660 "side effects" ...
http://www.judicialwatch.org/archive...ERSReports.pdf
You mean, adverse events. The adverse events are bad things that happen
after the vaccine was given. It does not mean that they are caused by
the vaccine. Another example of the confusion, which you call the tool
of the devil.
And here the listing of the first 3 reported deaths ...
http://www.judicialwatch.org/archive...AERSDeaths.pdf
None of which are necessarily related to the vaccine. In fact, I can
help but wonder if two of the reports are concerning the same person.
There are far more unknowns than knowns about this drug, and as school
begins in the next month, parents need to become more informed before
submitting their youngsters as lab rats.
Gee, more propaganda and confusion. The tool of devil.
Jeff
http://www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/
http://ilena-rosenthal.blogspot.com