Greegor wrote:
Would Dan Sullivan advise the family to COOPERATE
with this sort of an assenine witch hunt?

I don't know. But my best guess is, no.

In fact I don't "advise" them to either, as it would be bad legal advice
if I were giving it as such, and as non-legal advice I don't think one
should, guilty or innocent, forget that it's innocent until proven
guilty in this country.

No one is "required" to cooperate with an investigation, Greg.

My argument is that there should be an investigation to determine if
what the teaching aid thought she was experiencing was true or not.

What have you got against an investigation? No one is immune from them,
Greg.

What Constitutional provision is being violated in this case, Greg?

Or get stupid and ask another pointless question. Do you know what Dan
would advise this family, or is this another of your childish innuendo
sessions?

0:-]