On Feb 8, 7:37*am, Kevysmom wrote:
Every warning sheet mentions that a history of febrile

seizures after vaccination is a contraindication.

Even the CDC has warning su=igns that claim febrile seizures do occur
after vaccines!

Exactly. However, the lapse of time in this case says that it was
perfectly fine to administer the vaccine. There is no evidence to
suggest that the first febrile seizure was vaccine induced.


You have no basis to claim that the pre-existing febrile seizures were
vaccine related.

I have no reason to doubt that this could be the reason for the first
febrile seizure the infant had.

Sure you have a reason. It is called logic and science. Two things
that you cannot handle.


And that Markey, is NOT bull****!

By definition, whatever you post, is bull****.


On Feb 8, 7:24*am, Mark Probert wrote:



On Feb 7, 9:06*pm, Kevysmom wrote:

Please note that the baby had a pre-existing condition or history of
febrile seizure.-

Dont you just love it how they can say the child had a pre- existing
condition because the child had a febrile seizure, MOST likely after a
vaccine that was given.

Leaping Logic!

You have no basis to claim that the pre-existing febrile seizures were
vaccine related.

Like I have told you before, you do not have to take every opportunity
to prove you are an idiot.

But when vaccines cause febrile seizures after vaccines, there is no
concern according to Pharma!

Other than removing that idea from your rectum, where do you get this
bull****? Every warning sheet mentions that a history of febrile
seizures after vaccination is a contraindication.

Like I said, above, do not take every opportunity.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -