DCF is learning the hard way that employees should have background checks
"LK" wrote in message
...
On Feb 11, 12:59 am, "dragonsgirl" wrote:
"Greegor" wrote in message
...
DCF is now searching through personnel records of its 13,500 employees,
looking for any red flags. But that needed to happen in November 2006,
when a policy change required that all new employees go through
background screening.
The agency is considered the front line of defense for children who are
victims of dysfunctional chaos. Displacement is traumatic enough
without
having to fear someone in the system.
DCF is on the right track, making sure it weeds out potentially
dangerous employees. And it's a clear message to other governmental
agencies that deal with children that background checks are necessary
for all employees.
From the agency viewpoint isn't it good Public Relations
for them to root out their own perverts?
If they find some raging perverts inside their agency
will they announce it publicly? I doubt it.
So they can do their own version of "keep it in the family"
with all of the pervs they find internally, right?
How are they going to test hard enough to
find the perves within their agency?
If some slip through won't it prove that they
don't know their head from their heiney?
If they can't even accurately screen
their own people, how do they pretend
any credibility screening parents?
They don't screen parents.
Maybe they don't call it that.
They take parent's behaviors into account when determining their ability
to
parent.
And everything else they can find.
***Such as?
|