View Single Post
  #9  
Old February 24th 08, 05:38 AM posted to alt.support.child-protective-services,alt.support.foster-parents,alt.dads-rights.unmoderated,alt.parenting.spanking
LK
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 66
Default Foster father sentenced to 30 years for shaking infant, causingher to lose sight and ability to walk

On Feb 23, 7:26*pm, Greegor wrote:
On Feb 23, 4:40*pm, "Ron" wrote:

"LK" wrote in message


...
On Feb 22, 11:28 pm, LindaLouMom wrote:


I agree, Sometimes crazy stuff happens in fostercare. Although what
was the crazy stuff going on at home to have them takin in the first
place?
All the statistics you posted stated that children in foster care turn
out bad..well if the dam bio parents were doing the RIGHT thing (not
abusing the children, feeding them, protecting them) then these
children would not be in foster care. Therefore, the final blame rest
with the BIO-PARENTS..not anyone else. Of course fosterparents who
commit crazy acts as the one just discussed needs to be sentenced to
jail...


Just because the caseworkers pull children from their home does not
make the caseworks the bad people....they are ONLY trying to protect
them from the DANGER they face in their current home situation.
What a great example of the Self-Righteously Hypocritical mentality
that jusfifies babystealing and plagues the falsley accused easy
targets such as poor.
Here, allow me to enlighten you oh great loud opinion based on
ignorance person here. *Visithttp://www.LegallyKidnapped.blogspot.com


We know that you would not agree with that position, but then again you do
seem to have issues with facts dont you. *Not to fear, there are more than
eough examples of **** poor parenting on both sides of the issue for
everyone. *The difference is, when the parents fail to do their job the
child suffers. *The same could be said for foster parents, but then again if
the parents had not failed the children would not be in care.


Ron


Is there a miniumum IQ requirement for people wanting to be Fosters?

In WHAT way are the parents responsible
for horrible child abuse at the hands OF THE SYSTEM?

The argument is really sick.

If a kid was removed for the neglect because
of a messy house, how are those parents
responsible when the kids get their heads
bashed in in foster care?


I've argued this point with Ron before. He uses a very simple logical
aproach to this issue. He thinks that if the real parents hadn't
****ed up in the first place, the kids wouldn't be in foster care and
therefore these horrible things wouldn't have happened to them while
in foster care. Right Ron?

His view is kind of like knocking down that first domino, if the first
one hadn't been knocked over, the last one wouldn't have fallen so
it's all the first ones fault. The original **** up of the real
parents causes everything else to happen like a chain reaction, so Ron
feels that the real parents are to blame for setting off the chain
reacition, and that makes everything that happens to the kid while in
care the responsibility of the real parents.