If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Moving forward on foster care?
Moving forward on foster care
Monday, October 15, 2007 http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl.../EDFFSOMTK.DTL Slowly but surely, the state of California is taking steps to ensure that foster children, who are our collective responsibility, are able to live with a modicum of decency and care. Last week, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed two important bills: AB1331, which requires county welfare agencies to help disabled foster youth apply for the federal Supplemental Security Income program before they are emancipated from the foster care system, and SB39, which publicly opens the case files for foster children who died as a result of abuse and neglect. Neither of these bills is showy or expensive. What each represents is pragmatism and common sense, two of the most underrated qualities in Sacramento. For that reason, they stand a chance of actually having a positive impact on the lives of California's 86,000 foster children. AB1331 shouldn't even be necessary - why wouldn't county agencies make an attempt to help disabled foster children secure the federal assistance that is available to all disabled people who have little income, not just those who are in foster care? Unfortunately, the need for this law points out how disorganized the foster care system truly is, and how fundamentally it can fail our children. With the passage of AB1331, which was authored by Assemblywoman Noreen Evans, D-Santa Rosa, California will become the first state to ensure that disabled foster children have their benefits in place upon emancipation. We hope it won't be the last. Sen. Carole Migden, D-San Francisco, authored SB39, which will provide far more transparency into our foster care system. Before its passage, the only way for a member of the public to learn basic information about a foster child who had died in the system, as a result of abuse and neglect, was to file a lawsuit. Opponents of SB39 - and similar bills that preceded it - claimed that disclosing information about the dead children could be detrimental to the privacy of social workers and foster families. SB39 redacts sensitive information about those parties while reminding the state who it is supposed to be serving - the children placed in its care, not those who are collecting its paychecks. CURRENTLY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES VIOLATES MORE CIVIL RIGHTS ON A DAILY BASIS THEN ALL OTHER AGENCIES COMBINED INCLUDING THE NSA / CIA WIRETAPPING PROGRAM.... CPS Does not protect children... It is sickening how many children are subject to abuse, neglect and even killed at the hands of Child Protective Services. every parent should read this .pdf from connecticut dcf watch... http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com/8x11.pdf http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com Number of Cases per 100,000 children in the US These numbers come from The National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect in Washington. (NCCAN) Recent numbers have increased significantly for CPS *Perpetrators of Maltreatment* Physical Abuse CPS 160, Parents 59 Sexual Abuse CPS 112, Parents 13 Neglect CPS 410, Parents 241 Medical Neglect CPS 14 Parents 12 Fatalities CPS 6.4, Parents 1.5 Imagine that, 6.4 children die at the hands of the very agencies that are supposed to protect them and only 1.5 at the hands of parents per 100,000 children. CPS perpetrates more abuse, neglect, and sexual abuse and kills more children then parents in the United States. If the citizens of this country hold CPS to the same standards that they hold parents too. No judge should ever put another child in the hands of ANY government agency because CPS nationwide is guilty of more harm and death than any human being combined. CPS nationwide is guilty of more human rights violations and deaths of children then the homes from which they were removed. When are the judges going to wake up and see that they are sending children to their death and a life of abuse when children are removed from safe homes based on the mere opinion of a bunch of social workers. CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, HAPPILY DESTROYING THOUSANDS OF INNOCENT FAMILIES YEARLY NATIONWIDE AND COMING TO YOU'RE HOME SOON... BE SURE TO FIND OUT WHERE YOUR CANDIDATES STANDS ON THE ISSUE OF REFORMING OR ABOLISHING CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES ("MAKE YOUR CANDIDATES TAKE A STAND ON THIS ISSUE.") THEN REMEMBER TO VOTE ACCORDINGLY IF THEY ARE "FAMILY UNFRIENDLY" IN THE NEXT ELECTION... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|