The Embry study: What it actually said.

Doan wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:


Doan wrote:

On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:



Doan wrote:


On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:




Doan wrote:



On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:





Doan wrote:




On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:






Doan wrote:





A dodger and liar, that's what you are! ;-)

No, just a promise keeper. I offered to debate you. You declined. You
are the dodger and liar. It's most obvious.

Heard from Alina yet. She wrote back finally. Seems she's safe and all.
Just busy. Says to say hello and could you hurry up with that copy. She
mailed you the envelope a long time ago, she tells me.

What's up with THAT?

She lying or is it you?


My bet is you are the LIAR! Tell her is post here publicly that she said
the above. If there is no post from her, then YOU ARE A LIAR!

I can't make her do anything unless she wants to. How could HER choice
make ME a liar. I'm not her.


You brought her into this. I didn't!

That...hehehe...remains to be seen. But last I noticed, "Aline/Alina"
"brought" herself into this ng and this question of "whose got the Embry
study?"


She was suppose to get a copy from you and sneak it to me, remember? ;-)

Is that what happened? How do you know I didn't send her a copy?


You did send her a copy. She then secretly sent it to me. That's
how I got a copy. ;-)

I can't tell you how disappointed in her I am then. How sad.

But that means, of course, 0:-, you were lying and have been lying all
this time.

Tsk, Doan, tsk. Or you are lying now. Which is it?


You can ask yourself the same question. Which is it? I ALREADY know the
answer - YOU ARE A LIAR! ;-)

Even your Anti-Truth meds can't stave off the feelings of panic you are
having, and showing.

You seem unable to answer the question.

And how do you know if I am lying or not?

Doan

Just guessing?

So tell us, did she sneak you my copy, or did you already have a copy?

0:-


--
Isn't it interesting that the more honest an author appears to be,
the more like ourselves we think him. And the less so, how very
alien he doth appear? Kane 2006

Doan wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:


Doan wrote:

On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Doan wrote:



On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:



Doan wrote:


On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:




Doan wrote:



The Lie:

"Pretty remarkable when one considers that parents who spanked before
had children that attemped entries at the highest rate of all per
hour."

Still don't know where I got that, eh? R R R R RR


NOT FROM THE EMBRY STUDY!

Didn't say I did. 0:-

I thought so! ;-)

Hypocrit!


So either the above quotes are from the study (a LIE) or they are not?
Which is it?

Doan


Come on, ignoranus kane0. It shouldn't take your that long to response.
;-)

While you were busy chasing the balls that got past you on the little
court you are playing on you missed the return:


And you have missed the whole game! ;-)

Whatever gave you the idea that I was playing your game?

Doan

You really think other people are too stupid to follow the argument by
complexity that you engage in?

I asked you if you had a copy of the report given you by Alina, as you
claimed.

And if so, were you then lying all this time that you had a copy of your
own that you were willing to mail Alina, if...chuckle...she'd send you
a self addressed stamped envelope?

You haven't answered either question.

You just dodged about.

Do you think time will solve this trap you made and fell into yourself?

I don't. Your posting history is of course available to all.

Any time anyone has a question about your supposed honesty this will be
here.

That you claimed you had the study. That you offered it to Alina, but
then, now, you claim she got mine and slipped you a copy.

Kind of flies in the face of reality, doesn't it?

And you know the card I hold. Don't you little monkey?

MM...mmm it's off to work we go, hi ho hi ho.

0:-


--
Isn't it interesting that the more honest an author appears to be,
the more like ourselves we think him. And the less so, how very
alien he doth appear? Kane 2006

On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:

Doan wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:


Doan wrote:

On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:



Doan wrote:


On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:




Doan wrote:



On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:





Doan wrote:




On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:






Doan wrote:





A dodger and liar, that's what you are! ;-)

No, just a promise keeper. I offered to debate you. You declined. You
are the dodger and liar. It's most obvious.

Heard from Alina yet. She wrote back finally. Seems she's safe and all.
Just busy. Says to say hello and could you hurry up with that copy. She
mailed you the envelope a long time ago, she tells me.

What's up with THAT?

She lying or is it you?


My bet is you are the LIAR! Tell her is post here publicly that she said
the above. If there is no post from her, then YOU ARE A LIAR!

I can't make her do anything unless she wants to. How could HER choice
make ME a liar. I'm not her.


You brought her into this. I didn't!

That...hehehe...remains to be seen. But last I noticed, "Aline/Alina"
"brought" herself into this ng and this question of "whose got the Embry
study?"


She was suppose to get a copy from you and sneak it to me, remember? ;-)

Is that what happened? How do you know I didn't send her a copy?


You did send her a copy. She then secretly sent it to me. That's
how I got a copy. ;-)

I can't tell you how disappointed in her I am then. How sad.

But that means, of course, 0:-, you were lying and have been lying all
this time.

Tsk, Doan, tsk. Or you are lying now. Which is it?


You can ask yourself the same question. Which is it? I ALREADY know the
answer - YOU ARE A LIAR! ;-)

Even your Anti-Truth meds can't stave off the feelings of panic you are
having, and showing.

You seem unable to answer the question.

And how do you know if I am lying or not?

I have already PROVEN so! ;-)

Doan

On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:

Doan wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:


Doan wrote:

On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Doan wrote:



On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:



Doan wrote:


On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:




Doan wrote:



The Lie:

"Pretty remarkable when one considers that parents who spanked before
had children that attemped entries at the highest rate of all per
hour."

Still don't know where I got that, eh? R R R R RR


NOT FROM THE EMBRY STUDY!

Didn't say I did. 0:-

I thought so! ;-)

Hypocrit!


So either the above quotes are from the study (a LIE) or they are not?
Which is it?

Doan


Come on, ignoranus kane0. It shouldn't take your that long to response.
;-)

While you were busy chasing the balls that got past you on the little
court you are playing on you missed the return:


And you have missed the whole game! ;-)

Whatever gave you the idea that I was playing your game?

You are responding to my post, STUPID! ;-)

Doan

Doan wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:

Doan wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:


Doan wrote:

On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Doan wrote:



On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:



Doan wrote:


On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:




Doan wrote:



The Lie:

"Pretty remarkable when one considers that parents who spanked before
had children that attemped entries at the highest rate of all per
hour."

Still don't know where I got that, eh? R R R R RR


NOT FROM THE EMBRY STUDY!

Didn't say I did. 0:-

I thought so! ;-)

Hypocrit!


So either the above quotes are from the study (a LIE) or they are not?
Which is it?

Doan


Come on, ignoranus kane0. It shouldn't take your that long to response.
;-)

While you were busy chasing the balls that got past you on the little
court you are playing on you missed the return:


And you have missed the whole game! ;-)

Whatever gave you the idea that I was playing your game?

You are responding to my post, STUPID! ;-)

Yes, that's my game alright. Thanks for noticing.


Doan

0:-

Doan wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:

Doan wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:


Doan wrote:

On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Doan wrote:



On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:



Doan wrote:


On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:




Doan wrote:



The Lie:

"Pretty remarkable when one considers that parents who spanked before
had children that attemped entries at the highest rate of all per
hour."

Still don't know where I got that, eh? R R R R RR


NOT FROM THE EMBRY STUDY!

Didn't say I did. 0:-

I thought so! ;-)

Hypocrit!


So either the above quotes are from the study (a LIE) or they are not?
Which is it?

Doan


Come on, ignoranus kane0. It shouldn't take your that long to response.
;-)

While you were busy chasing the balls that got past you on the little
court you are playing on you missed the return:


And you have missed the whole game! ;-)

Whatever gave you the idea that I was playing your game?

You are responding to my post, STUPID! ;-)

Yes, that's my game alright. Thanks for noticing.

.... and responding to my post.


Doan

0:-

On 16 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:


Doan wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:

Doan wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:


Doan wrote:

On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Doan wrote:



On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:



Doan wrote:


On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:




Doan wrote:



The Lie:

"Pretty remarkable when one considers that parents who spanked before
had children that attemped entries at the highest rate of all per
hour."

Still don't know where I got that, eh? R R R R RR


NOT FROM THE EMBRY STUDY!

Didn't say I did. 0:-

I thought so! ;-)

Hypocrit!


So either the above quotes are from the study (a LIE) or they are not?
Which is it?

Doan


Come on, ignoranus kane0. It shouldn't take your that long to response.
;-)

While you were busy chasing the balls that got past you on the little
court you are playing on you missed the return:


And you have missed the whole game! ;-)

Whatever gave you the idea that I was playing your game?

You are responding to my post, STUPID! ;-)

Yes, that's my game alright. Thanks for noticing.

That you are STUPID? I have already proven that. BTW, you are welcome!
;-)

Doan

Doan-

Is Kane still dribbling about his unbiased research studies and using
it to support the punishment of parents who don't goose step to his
diatribe?


*****
Non-spanker by choice,
Chris C.
TX



Doan wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Doan wrote:

The Lie:

"Pretty remarkable when one considers that parents who spanked before
had children that attemped entries at the highest rate of all per
hour."

Still don't know where I got that, eh? R R R R RR

NOT FROM THE EMBRY STUDY!

Doan

Is this another "mistake", Kane? ;-)

Doan

Yup! And get this, the Embry study has nothing to do with
spanking at all. He has been lying about it all along.
He is caught in a lie and now trying very hard to extricate
himself.

Doan

On 22 Feb 2006 wrote:

Doan-

Is Kane still dribbling about his unbiased research studies and using
it to support the punishment of parents who don't goose step to his
diatribe?


*****
Non-spanker by choice,
Chris C.
TX



Doan wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Doan wrote:

The Lie:

"Pretty remarkable when one considers that parents who spanked before
had children that attemped entries at the highest rate of all per
hour."

Still don't know where I got that, eh? R R R R RR

NOT FROM THE EMBRY STUDY!

Doan

Is this another "mistake", Kane? ;-)

Doan

wrote:
Doan-

Is Kane still dribbling about his unbiased research studies and using
it to support the punishment of parents who don't goose step to his
diatribe?


*****
Non-spanker by choice,

Non parent by choice. And one that posts others webpage information in
ways that twist the meaning of the author to mean the opposite of the
author's intent. A liar.

Welcome back Chris with no children.

By the way, you are lying about me above. But hey, at least you are
consistent.

Would you care to discuss and repost all the posts of yours and others
concerning how you misquoted someone's intellectual property to make it
appear it appeared to not be anti spanking, when in full it clearly
was?

Let's chat, shall we? 0:-


Chris C.
TX