If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
Costumed weddings, was But that's a girl's toy!
x-no-archive:yes toto wrote:
On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 18:39:07 GMT, Rosalie B. wrote: I don't think that the bride should dictate to the mothers what they should wear at the wedding. It is, after all, not a stage production. Heh! Unless you get a dd like mine who is a scenic artist, has friends in theater and a fiance who also has theater in his blood. Then you get a Rennaissance Costume wedding with not only the bride's parents and groom's parents in costume, but many of the guests in costume too g Well that would be different. IMHO anyway. And dictating the style of dress is somewhat different from saying what color someone should wear. I think the bride should chose bridesmaids dresses that look good on the bridesmaids. That is in colors that are flattering, or at least not too unflattering, and in styles that don't accentuate the least flattering physical characteristics of the bridesmaids. If the bride choses something that makes her (presumably) friends look awful, she's not much of a friend. And if the bridemaid is her future in-law then this doesn't argue well for future family relations. (I don't know if anyone answered this, but in the US, the bridesmaids buy their own dresses and there is quite a bit of expense to being a bridesmaid.) Some considerate brides might even let the bridesmaids wear clothes that they already own which are an appropriate harmonizing color and style. And I see nothing wrong with one of the mothers saying - that color doesn't flatter me and I want to look nice at your wedding. Some compromise can be made in most cases. I wore the same dress at the last three weddings of my children. My dd #2 helped me pick it out (my mom bought my dress for dd#1's wedding), and I really liked it, plus I hate shopping. I didn't wear it for any other events, and it was expensive. Neither dd#3 nor my DIL made any objection. My sister OTOH got a personal shopper so that she could be in the color of dress that her DIL prescribed, and her younger dd vetted her choice of dress for her older dd. For that wedding she had a silver lame knit - fortunately she's a dancer and has an excellent figure because that dress would show ANY flaws. Also, I think there is a BIG gap between refusing to be made ridiculous and being a MIL from hell. grandma Rosalie |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
But that's a girl's toy!
"Circe" wrote in message news:FUIzb.60133$kl6.46512@fed1read03...
"LisaBell" wrote in message ... On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 12:42:13 -0800, "Circe" wrote: She also likes dressing her Barbies in "princessy" things, as she has a major obsession with "pretty" things, but I don't think there's anything evil or wrong with that though I did once worry about it. Just wondering.... do you have to buy a bunch of doll princess outfits for that? Well, I wouldn't *have* to, but my mother and I have both bought her a couple of multi-packs of dressy Barbie-sized (not necessarily Barbie-brand) outfits, so she has a few more dresses than Barbies. No biggie. And what do kids do with the dolls once they are dressed? Well, I can't speak for other children, but my daughter's Barbies usually go to the (imaginary) park and play on the (imaginary) slides and swings, or else they are mommies taking care of baby or Kelly dolls. So in wondering whether to get her this doll for Channuka/Christmas, I'm trying to figure out whether this is going to just be an excuse for wanting more outfits and gear for the doll, which I'm not willing to invest too much in. Pretty dress up clothes for the girls (Disney and the like) are expensive enough without having to buy more overpriced playclothes for a doll. I have usually managed to get the dresses at fairly reasonable prices by buying multi-packs on sale or off-brand clothes for 11.5" dolls. I didn't consider the investment burdensome and, as I said in an earlier post, she isn't agitating for *more* clothes for her Barbies--at least not yet! -- Wanting lots of clothes for a doll, any doll, makes a lot of sense to me. That was what I always wanted when I was a little girl. When I was about 11 my mother got me a bride doll (an 18 or 20 inch little girl doll in a bride dress, which seems on the brink of obscenity now but at the time was just the way it was done G) for Christmas and she made a complete wardrobe for her, including a little velveteen suit with a hat, a party dress, an everyday play dress, and a nightgown. I was a little old for dolls by that time but I loved it because I could change her outfit to suit the time of day in the game, whatever it was. And when I was the right age, WW II was on and it was almost impossible to get toys, especially dolls. I still have the doll and most of the clothes. For me as a child the point was not consumption but verisimilitude ... I had different kinds of clothes for different activities or times of day, and my doll should too. Grandma Katie Mom to Barbara (Circe), Grandma to Julian, Aurora & Vernon |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
But that's a girl's toy!
"Circe" wrote in message news:33uzb.57823$kl6.28435@fed1read03...
"toypup" wrote in message news:RXszb.293605$9E1.1493295@attbi_s52... If your DS wants to play with Barbies, then buy him his own Barbies. Why should he be relegated to sharing his sister's? This way, he would have his own to play with and his sister would see that dolls aren't just for boys. Ah, more toys! Just what we need--NOT g! Vernon doesn't really play with the Barbies/dolls often enough to warrant getting him a stable of them. That said, I think I can see a point to doing this. My mom bought a Barbie at Target the other day because they were on sale for something like $2. Maybe we'll wrap it up and put it under the tree for Vernon. We certainly don't need more Barbies to resolve the "sharing" issue, but if he gets one for Christmas and we tell Aurora that, yes, it's REALLY for him and a boy really CAN have a Barbie, it might help. My bet is it'll wind up being "her" Barbie, anyway (all our toys are pretty much communal, anyway, with the exception of things that Vernon's too young to manage). But the illustrative value of the exercise might well be worth it... -- Good idea. I have the receipt right here. It was $1.97, to be exact G. Mom |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Review: Calendar Girls (***) | Steve Rhodes | General | 0 | November 21st 03 01:05 AM |
Alaska girl scounts trap, skin beavers | dejablues | General | 11 | November 14th 03 09:27 PM |
Interesting local article on baby names | sher | General | 292 | October 1st 03 12:08 AM |
Review: Uptown Girls (* 1/2) | Steve Rhodes | General | 0 | August 13th 03 01:21 AM |