If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
Bright 2nd grader & school truancy / part-time home-school?
: Oh, my dd : is at risk. Better threaten us with fines. I am really irate. Who came up : with such a stupid law? : : : Blame the zero-tolerance folks, the no child left behind folks... : : Bush anyone? : : : Bingo. And as far as I can tell, it's going to : get worse, not better. : Bull. If this were true, all schools would have such restrictive policies. They don't. -- ColoradoSkiBum |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
Bright 2nd grader & school truancy / part-time home-school?
"Ericka Kammerer" wrote in message ... Jenrose wrote: My daughter's classes are not self-paced, per se, nor self-directed. And the teacher/student ratio varies from 24:1 to 28:1, although we have enough parent volunteers that there are usually other adults around. Honestly, when you get a bunch of kids with different ability levels together, ditch the whole "letter grade" system, encourage group learning environments and make the curriculum one which allows children to do assignments to their ability rather than to one "objective" standard, then yes, you can accomplish an education with the same basic resources any public school should have. Ain't gonna happen in public schools as long as there's this rabid push for "accountability" through testing and attendance and other "objective" measurements that mean little to nothing. Um, she *is* in a public school. There's another public school in town, a charter school, that takes it even further, but it's farther from my house and I don't feel like moving her. We also have public magnet arts, public Spanish, French and Japanese immersion schools, plus a couple magnet academic schools. I was not even tempted by the magnet academic programs--my sister went to one and the attitude could be summed up thusly: "You know, college students have to do a lot of homework. So we better prepare them in high school by giving them a couple hours per night." "You know, high schoolers get quite a bit of homework. We better prepare our middle schoolers by giving them at least THREE hours per night." "You know, when that kid gets to middle school, he's going to have to do a lot of homework. So we're going to assign him a thesis paper now, in fifth grade, and he'll need to put in 5 hours every day after school to get it done." This leaves kindergarteners with eight hours of homework and caffeine jitters at the age of five, carried to the logical conclusion. I don't want to even think about preschool. I hyperbolize, but you get the point. My sister spent every spare minute working on homework (now she was undiagnosed ADD and had a hard time focusing, but still) from the time she was in 4th grade until she graduated high school. College hasn't been anywhere near as hard for her. It was very important for us to find a program that let kids be kids without the heavy homework load. She has gone from no homework in kindergarten to not quite an hour in 5th grade on a "heavy" night, and never not been able to get her homework done working no more than 10 min x grade level every night. Thus, with reasonable, age-appropriate expectations (and how many emotionally average academically gifted kids get loaded with age inappropriate amounts of work when their "enrichments" pile on top of a normal workload....) she's actually developed study skills which seem rare in kids that bright. But the point is that *all* these programs operate with the same budgets the neighborhood schools get, per pupil. There are some who argue that this kind of program "saps" the neighborhood schools of the brightest kids. In my experience, neighborhood schools with a "standard" normal curriculum rarely make enough use of the brightest kids to justify keeping them. And the kids in the magnet programs aren't all "the brightest" or "the richest"... plenty have struggles or issues or find some things harder. Lots and lots of kids with single parents--all the single parents I know well are sending their kids to magnet programs because there tends to be more social networking for parents there. In fact, many of the parents who send their kids to the magnet programs or charter schools would otherwise homeschool. I would have... Also, the magnet schools share buildings with neighborhood schools--ours works together and splits fundraising/extra teachers with our neighborhood school. There are more adults in the building because of the magnet program.What delights me about this program in particular is that it manages to provide an enriched learning environment for the same money to ALL kids at all ability levels. Isn't that how it *should* work? Shouldn't people be looking at taking this model out to the neighborhood schools? Jenrose |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
Bright 2nd grader & school truancy / part-time home-school?
|
#94
|
|||
|
|||
Bright 2nd grader & school truancy / part-time home-school?
In article ,
"ColoradoSkiBum" wrote: : Oh, my dd : is at risk. Better threaten us with fines. I am really irate. Who came up : with such a stupid law? : : : Blame the zero-tolerance folks, the no child left behind folks... : : Bush anyone? : : : Bingo. And as far as I can tell, it's going to : get worse, not better. : Bull. If this were true, all schools would have such restrictive policies. They don't. Not yet -- but from what I can see, they are all getting much, much worse. -- Children won't care how much you know until they know how much you care |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
Bright 2nd grader & school truancy / part-time home-school?
I don't think you can part-time homeschool this way, i.e., by just
keeping her out of school at random. However, lots of districts allow part-time homeschooling of a different sort, which involves the child doing certain subjects at school (with bright kids, that's often often the nonacademic ones) and certain others at home. That might be ideal for you, if your district allows it. I agree with your perspective to a certain extent. I don't find school to be a scintillating environment that my child shouldn't miss out on. I also have a child who is not learning a lot *academically* at school and who could undoubtedly do just as well on tests if he missed a day of school a week or more. And, as I would generally only want to take him out for enriching experiences, I would argue that his education would benefit from the absences. But I also sympathize with the huge organizational feat that school is, at least in my son's very large, rigidly structured school. Every time he misses school, work is created for his teacher. As far as I can tell, she is not at liberty to let him just miss work, even work that she knows he has mastered; she has to make sure he gets it all done at some point. Also, there are rules on the books that you need to watch out for. Might they come after you? Sure. School administrators tend to believe that they know what a kid needs much more than the parents do. Letting a child miss school for "no good reason" more often than very occasionally is tantamount, in their eyes, to not getting him/her vaccinated: totally, wildly irresponsible. So do be careful. |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
Bright 2nd grader & school truancy / part-time home-school?
"toypup" wrote
I doubt they'd get her for truancy if the only reason she's been out is for being sick, as long as you can prove it with a doctor's note. Sounds like the other reasons you feel are more important are getting in the way of her education. She said they weren't. When my son was in K, I used to take him out every now and then, and we always did stuff that was MUCH more educational than he did at school. Now that he is in 3rd grade, I will take him out much less frequently, due to the problems absences cause teachers and the sheer amount of makeup work he has to do when absent, but I will still occasionally take him out to do something great that it would be very inconvenient to do on the weekend. (Also, my kid tends to be pretty healthy, so I would not expect him to miss many, if any, schooldays other than for our educational trips.) Personally, I think you ought to either homeschool or follow school rules. My parents would never have let me miss school to visit family except for once when my grandma was dying, and we even got permission for that (we had to go halfway around the world for two weeks during finals). School is important. It is setting a precedent for how she will be in her adult life. When she gets a job, she can't just take off because of family unless it's an emergency. The comparison of school to a job is flawed, I think. An employer pays you to do work for them. Of course you owe it to them to show up, and of course they can and should fire you if you don't do your job. However, one does not send a child to school for the school's sake, and one is not beholden to a school the way one is to a paying employer. It could be argued that a child's "job" in school is to learn, and if she is learning just as much or more out of school, then. . . That said, I did already tell the OP that, basically, I didn't think it was fair to the teacher to take her child out of school at random. Though her child may well benefit from "voluntary absences," if they are frequent and done without the teacher's prior approval, they are probably a big PITA for the teacher, and she doesn't need another one of those, I'm sure. The OP should investigate official part-time homeschooling. She will have to see what the workplace rules are and work around that. If she doesn't like the workplace rules, she can find another job, like you can homeschool. But you shouldn't have her go to school and ignore the rules. |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
Bright 2nd grader & school truancy / part-time home-school?
In article ,
"Sue" wrote: I don't have a very high opinion of the brighter kids. It's not that I don't think they are or that they deserve a different teaching method and I understand that they do exist, but at our school they are segregated into one part of the school, they don't socialize with the other kids, they don't participate in any of the school functions and they are made to feel that they are superior. It may not be all one way, you realise. I was in such a class for the last two years of primary school and my softball team was in the final. Though I (like everyone else) socialised mainly inside my class, I had no idea that we were resented by the other children until we were booed. And we certainly didn't, in general, believe we were superior beings! Even the name of the program is insulting to the other kids. It is called the Talented and Gifted program. Well imo, every child that attends that school is talented and gifted in some way. No, those terms actually have technical meanings. "Talent" generally refers to a particular thing that a child is good at while they are pretty average for everything else (think of a talent for music or gymnastics). "Gifted" children are highly intelligent, and there is a hierarchy of adjectives to go with it, such as "moderately" or "profoundly", which describe their IQ range. -- Chookie -- Sydney, Australia (Replace "foulspambegone" with "optushome" to reply) "Jeez; if only those Ancient Greek storytellers had known about the astonishing creature that is the *Usenet hydra*: you cut off one head, and *a stupider one* grows back..." -- MJ, cam.misc |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
Bright 2nd grader & school truancy / part-time home-school?
In article ,
"Vicki" wrote: We have discussed getting appropriate challenge in her classroom--the teacher has been helpful, but there is only so much she can do. We chose not to skip dd to the next grade as she is already the youngest in her class. I've just been reading a book about exceptionally gifted children by Miraca Gross. She comes down heavily in favour of acceleration for the profoundly gifted, on the grounds that children (and adults) tend to befriend their *intellectual* peers rather than their age-peers. Her research/literature survey indicated that profoundly gifted children are usually socially and morally advanced as well as being academically advanced, and fit in well with *and are accepted by* older classmates, once they are officially members of that class. My only hesitation is that this book was written in 1989 and more research may have changed the picture a bit. However, I agree firmly with her that a child that is left in a class where everything comes very easily will not learn to apply herself, may become naughty through boredom, may underachieve through a desire to fit in, may be socially isolated because she is developmentally and intellectually so far ahead of the rest, or may just retreat into misery. Your DD may not be in the "profoundly gifted" category, but the same thing is true -- just to a lesser extent -- for gifted children in other categories. I think you should reconsider acceleration. -- Chookie -- Sydney, Australia (Replace "foulspambegone" with "optushome" to reply) "Jeez; if only those Ancient Greek storytellers had known about the astonishing creature that is the *Usenet hydra*: you cut off one head, and *a stupider one* grows back..." -- MJ, cam.misc |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
Bright 2nd grader & school truancy / part-time home-school?
x-no-archive:yes
"Jenrose" wrote: "Ericka Kammerer" wrote in message ... Jenrose wrote: snip I agree...but I've also been in situations myself where the teacher and the school were not interested in making ANY adaptations, so I skated through, bored. Mom agitated, but they mainstreamed the gifted kids to the "CP" program from the "advanced placement" for 11th grade...and it was terrible. They said they did it to "bring up" the level of the CP class...yet we were getting cutsy certificates with stickers on them for acing brainless quizzes about poor movie adaptations of literature. I agree that anything that puts a kid up as "separate" is lousy--but when a kid is very bright and clearly bored by the curriculum, they're both isolated AND bored silly--might as well cure the boredom if you can't fix the isolation. snip Banty and Ericka have said they were in gifted programs I was not (I'm a member of Mensa BTW). We did have 'tracked' elementary grades where I went to school but no G&T - that was way after my time. We didn't even have AP classes in HS. I do not remember being bored in school, or being isolated or any of the other things that have been posited as problems for a bright child. I dealt with boredom by daydreaming. I didn't even get into trouble for that very often. So my point is - a bright child CAN and probably IMHO SHOULD be able to deal with boredom. Everyone gets bored sometimes - even kids in the GT programs. It is not the end of the world. Usually the child will have some outside interest that they spend time doing - I knew a boy who was a ham in 9th grade for instance. My parents did do enrichment things - we traveled, we took music lessons, she took us to the library weekly, we did things as a family, we were in scouts, etc. But as dedicated as my mom was to seeing that we had everything we needed, she did not go toe-to-toe with the school administration on my behalf except twice - once was in kindergarten when they were refusing to use a double name (like Mary Jane), and once was when I was put into a group in 9th grade which was non-college prep. (It was done alphabetically and she found that there was a girl in my homeroom who was engaged.) If a child hates school, it almost always IME is because of something other than the curriculum being too easy. It's because of the teacher's attitude or bullying or some other aspect of school. grandma Rosalie |
#100
|
|||
|
|||
Bright 2nd grader & school truancy / part-time home-school?
In article , Rosalie B. says...
x-no-archive:yes "Jenrose" wrote: "Ericka Kammerer" wrote in message ... Jenrose wrote: snip I agree...but I've also been in situations myself where the teacher and the school were not interested in making ANY adaptations, so I skated through, bored. Mom agitated, but they mainstreamed the gifted kids to the "CP" program from the "advanced placement" for 11th grade...and it was terrible. They said they did it to "bring up" the level of the CP class...yet we were getting cutsy certificates with stickers on them for acing brainless quizzes about poor movie adaptations of literature. I agree that anything that puts a kid up as "separate" is lousy--but when a kid is very bright and clearly bored by the curriculum, they're both isolated AND bored silly--might as well cure the boredom if you can't fix the isolation. snip Banty and Ericka have said they were in gifted programs Not really - only in 7th grade, where I was put on an accelerated track in one school. That was in 1967 - a lot of this kind of program was just starting. Other than that, my acceleration was by having been started early. I didn't turn five in kindergarten until March. I was not (I'm a member of Mensa BTW). We did have 'tracked' elementary grades where I went to school but no G&T - that was way after my time. We didn't even have AP classes in HS. I do not remember being bored in school, or being isolated or any of the other things that have been posited as problems for a bright child. I dealt with boredom by daydreaming. I didn't even get into trouble for that very often. So my point is - a bright child CAN and probably IMHO SHOULD be able to deal with boredom. Everyone gets bored sometimes - even kids in the GT programs. It is not the end of the world. Usually the child will have some outside interest that they spend time doing - I knew a boy who was a ham in 9th grade for instance. It's been sort of a siren song in recent years that 'gifted and talented' kids will all be driven to bad behavior and worse by boredom. The U.N. Commision on Human Rights hasn't exactly found the need to be entertained to be primary, and Norman Rockwell didn't paint a fifth for his famous set with a title "Freedom from Boredom". In some of this GT talk from parents I do find an attitude that their child should not have to deal with boredom. It's very valuable to learn to deal with boredom! Maybe even life-saving, as some of the folks in traffic jams who act like there's a fire under their ass have demonstrated. OK, enough with the hyperbole :-) Nothing against having some kind of accelerated learning for bright students, which I think is goodness, but it needs to be done in an intelligent and balanced way. Rosalie has an impoartant point. In myy daaay :utting on my bifocals and peering through them :-) :: skipping grades was pretty much the only way to accelerate. That had been done in my case, but I was still way over my peers academically. So the difference was made up by, yes, my learning to deal with boredom, but also by supplementing knowledge *on my own*, like poring over encyclopedias. Some teachers, with just one student in their class who's catching on to advanced stuff would lose themselves in it for awhile, leaving the average kids to deal with boredom for awhile! (And discipline those days was much more strict - boredom was not an excuse, so it wasn't a class control problem.) Like when my sixth grade English teacher would get totally into diagramming of complex sentences, and I would eat it up. My parents did do enrichment things - we traveled, we took music lessons, she took us to the library weekly, we did things as a family, we were in scouts, etc. But as dedicated as my mom was to seeing that we had everything we needed, she did not go toe-to-toe with the school administration on my behalf except twice - once was in kindergarten when they were refusing to use a double name (like Mary Jane), Wow - I was given a middle name that would go with my first so that in Texas my double name would fit in.. and once was when I was put into a group in 9th grade which was non-college prep. (It was done alphabetically and she found that there was a girl in my homeroom who was engaged.) If a child hates school, it almost always IME is because of something other than the curriculum being too easy. It's because of the teacher's attitude or bullying or some other aspect of school. Well, common bullying of very bright kids *is* a reason to give them peers who are bright like them, or otherwise their intellectual peers. But there's the angle also that there shouldn't be *any* bullying and schools are now finally dealing with that. I do think there need to be some accelerated programs for bright kids. But on the other hand I don't sign on to this idea that it's necessarily utter disaster if there isn't. So - what, every farmer in a small rural district should up and sell the farm and move to get his kid into a GT program? There is a *lot* that parents, and especially the child herself or himself, can do outside school to develop themselves and supplement their own learning. Hobbies, clubs, scouts, outside reading, travel. And, BTW, there's 180 days of school a year, covering only about 2/3 of a work day for each day. There's *plenty* of time for that outside school. IMO by far most of the reasons parents take their kids out of school for 'enrichment' it's really a matter of parental convenience such as cheaper travel, etc. I can fully understand why schools are cracking down on some of this. Banty Banty |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Teen faces expulsion and felony for loaning girlfriend medicine | Kane | General | 55 | October 22nd 03 03:04 AM |
PE/Recess time mandates | Donna Metler | General | 190 | October 2nd 03 01:26 PM |
DCF CT monitor finds kids *worsen* while in state custody | Kane | General | 8 | August 13th 03 07:43 AM |
Philly public schools go soda free! email to your school board | Maurice | General | 1 | July 14th 03 01:05 AM |
Virtual school seeks Iowa funding | [email protected] | General | 4 | June 29th 03 12:55 AM |