this is true of Child Support

sometimes, some of the
Child Support that men are forced to pay ends up getting used to pay
for computers and for internet access for women to bitch & moan online
about how they're not getting enough $$$$ from the man.

Also, CS doesn't always stand for Child Support. sometimes it stands
for C _ _ _ Support.
fill in the blank.

On Nov 10, 4:46 am, R300 wrote:
sometimes, some of the
Child Support that men are forced to pay ends up getting used to pay
for computers and for internet access for women to bitch & moan online
about how they're not getting enough $$$$ from the man.

Also, CS doesn't always stand for Child Support. sometimes it stands
for C _ _ _ Support.
fill in the blank.

Sometimes the men that have to pay child support complain that they
can't afford to do so, yet thay have computers and internet service to
bitch about how they can't afford to pay for their children online.

You are a lying nasty bitch. Never once did I ever say I can't afford my kid.
How's this? Please post the link or CAP where I said I could not afford my
kid.

You'll be hard pressed to do so because I never said that, and had I ever
said that, you would have posted it!

Just because I feel child support should be paid when there is a court order
doesn't mean that I can't afford my child. You and a few others on here seem
to be the ones with that problem.

There are a few on here complaining that they can't afford their child
support and to support their new families. Guess what? Child support was
established (92.89% of the time) before the new families are created. Child
support that was court ordered should have been factored into the budgets
where the NCP starts a new family. I have money to cover All of mine, my
child, and husband's expenses. Hate if you want to bitch!



Gini wrote:
============================================
NOT POSTED VIA FAMILYKB. THEY ARE STEALING
CONTENT FROM USENET
============================================
wrote
.........................

Sometimes the men that have to pay child support complain that they
can't afford to do so, yet thay have computers and internet service to
bitch about how they can't afford to pay for their children online.
==
LOL...........*you* have been doing nothing but bitch about how you can't
afford your child
yet, you are obviously online.

--
Message posted via FamilyKB.com
http://www.familykb.com/Uwe/Forums.a...nting/200711/1

"Illiana via FamilyKB.com" u38194@uwe wrote in

established (92.89% of the time) before the new families are created.
Child
support that was court ordered should have been factored into the budgets
where the NCP starts a new family.

So everything ordered by a Kourt is ok with you?

If I had court order to burn you at the stake as a Witch, would you be OK
with that?


I have money to cover All of mine, my
child, and husband's expenses. Hate if you want to bitch!

So Juvenile!

So everything ordered by a Kourt is ok with you?
If that is what your tiny brain thinks I said.

If I had court order to burn you at the stake as a Witch, would you be OK
with that?
There is no such thing as a witch, and everyone knows that there is no such
thing as magic, only illusion.

So Juvenile!
As opposed as to so jealous?

DB wrote:
"Illiana via FamilyKB.com" u38194@uwe wrote in

established (92.89% of the time) before the new families are created.
Child
support that was court ordered should have been factored into the budgets
where the NCP starts a new family.

So everything ordered by a Kourt is ok with you?

If I had court order to burn you at the stake as a Witch, would you be OK
with that?

I have money to cover All of mine, my
child, and husband's expenses. Hate if you want to bitch!

So Juvenile!

--
Message posted via http://www.familykb.com

"Jill" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 09:30:09 -0800, "DB" wrote:


"Illiana via FamilyKB.com" u38194@uwe wrote in

established (92.89% of the time) before the new families are created.
Child
support that was court ordered should have been factored into the
budgets
where the NCP starts a new family.

So everything ordered by a Kourt is ok with you?

If I had court order to burn you at the stake as a Witch, would you be OK
with that?

What an appealing picture that is. You're just trying to cheer me up
now, aren't you? g

More cheerful is she is now on the PLONK list! :-)

On 13 nov, 15:09, "DB" wrote:
"Jill" wrote in message

...





On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 09:30:09 -0800, "DB" wrote:

"Illiana via FamilyKB.com" u38194@uwe wrote in

established (92.89% of the time) before the new families are created.
Child
support that was court ordered should have been factored into the
budgets
where the NCP starts a new family.

So everything ordered by a Kourt is ok with you?

If I had court order to burn you at the stake as a Witch, would you be OK
with that?

What an appealing picture that is. You're just trying to cheer me up
now, aren't you? g

More cheerful is she is now on the PLONK list! :-)- Ocultar texto de la cita -

- Mostrar texto de la cita -

Illiana...why is it that you think that a non-custodial parent should
have to always pay the same amount, even if the start a new family...
but when the custodial parent re-marries and start a new family, I can
assure you that they don't spend the same amount of money
on their child receiving CS as they did BEFORE starting their second
family.

I just don't get it. In EVERY SINGLE FAMILY ADULTS make choices to
either have more children or not...period. Not the children. With
that said,
IN EVERY SINGLE FAMILY the choice to have more children is hardly
ever because the parents received a raise and now have DOUBLE the
income
they originally had...not, they might have the same or a bit more
income
and therefore, the expenses of the two children are paid by whatever
money is in the household...that means that if originally they spent
100USD a month on clothing for one child, when they have a second
without any increase in salary, they only spend 50USD on clothing for
each of the children...

It seems to me that you complain so much, but I CAN ASSURE you that
when you re-marry and have more children, YOU DO NOT continue to
spend the same amount on your eldest child...you spend less...but
as soon as a non-custodial parent wants to do the same, you complain
and call him a deadbeat...

Deadbeat are the mothers who re-marry and don't work and allow only
their ex's and their new hubby's to financially support their
children,
while complaining about their ex wanting to spend less on the
children...

whatamess wrote:
"Illiana via FamilyKB.com" u38194@uwe wrote in

[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]

- Mostrar texto de la cita -

Illiana...why is it that you think that a non-custodial parent should
have to always pay the same amount, even if the start a new family...
but when the custodial parent re-marries and start a new family, I can
assure you that they don't spend the same amount of money
on their child receiving CS as they did BEFORE starting their second
family.

I just don't get it. In EVERY SINGLE FAMILY ADULTS make choices to
either have more children or not...period. Not the children. With
that said,
IN EVERY SINGLE FAMILY the choice to have more children is hardly
ever because the parents received a raise and now have DOUBLE the
income
they originally had...not, they might have the same or a bit more
income
and therefore, the expenses of the two children are paid by whatever
money is in the household...that means that if originally they spent
100USD a month on clothing for one child, when they have a second
without any increase in salary, they only spend 50USD on clothing for
each of the children...

It seems to me that you complain so much, but I CAN ASSURE you that
when you re-marry and have more children, YOU DO NOT continue to
spend the same amount on your eldest child...you spend less...but
as soon as a non-custodial parent wants to do the same, you complain
and call him a deadbeat...

Deadbeat are the mothers who re-marry and don't work and allow only
their ex's and their new hubby's to financially support their
children,
while complaining about their ex wanting to spend less on the
children...
True dat. I chose not to get caught up with more than 4. That' why I give
ho's a fake name. I probly got 2 more kids-lol
I'm never gona pay, and they never gona jail me for it.
Iliana stop bitchin' ho, nobody told you to have a kid. If I paid for mine I
wouldn't have the fly **** I do. My wife pays all the bills and you should
too.

--
Message posted via FamilyKB.com
http://www.familykb.com/Uwe/Forums.a...nting/200711/1

"glenburke via FamilyKB.com" u38768@uwe wrote jiberrish in a message
news:7b2d70a946fec@uwe...


True dat. I chose not to get caught up with more than 4. That' why I give
ho's a fake name.

--
Message posted via FamilyKB.com
http://www.familykb.com/Uwe/Forums.a...nting/200711/1


PLONK

"Illiana via FamilyKB.com" u38194@uwe wrote in message
news:7b29405cae8e4@uwe...
You are a lying nasty bitch. Never once did I ever say I can't afford my
kid.
How's this? Please post the link or CAP where I said I could not afford my
kid.

You'll be hard pressed to do so because I never said that, and had I ever
said that, you would have posted it!

Just because I feel child support should be paid when there is a court
order
doesn't mean that I can't afford my child. You and a few others on here
seem
to be the ones with that problem.

There are a few on here complaining that they can't afford their child
support and to support their new families. Guess what? Child support was
established (92.89% of the time)

Wow--I have never seen that particular statistic before. Can you please post
teh site where you got it. Thanks

before the new families are created. Child
support that was court ordered should have been factored into the budgets
where the NCP starts a new family. I have money to cover All of mine, my
child, and husband's expenses. Hate if you want to bitch!



Gini wrote:
============================================
NOT POSTED VIA FAMILYKB. THEY ARE STEALING
CONTENT FROM USENET
============================================
wrote
.........................

Sometimes the men that have to pay child support complain that they
can't afford to do so, yet thay have computers and internet service to
bitch about how they can't afford to pay for their children online.
==
LOL...........*you* have been doing nothing but bitch about how you can't
afford your child
yet, you are obviously online.

--
Message posted via FamilyKB.com
http://www.familykb.com/Uwe/Forums.a...nting/200711/1