If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Anaphylactic children
http://www.whale.to/vaccines/hoffman.html
With hundreds of new vaccines in the pipeline, how much longer can we continue to inject more and more foreign proteins via vaccination into human beings without eventually creating a totally defenseless population? How many more children will become anaphylactic, be rushed to emergency fighting for their lives or die before something is done? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Anaphylactic children
"john" wrote in message ... http://www.whale.to/vaccines/hoffman.html With hundreds of new vaccines in the pipeline, how much longer can we continue to inject more and more foreign proteins via vaccination into human beings without eventually creating a totally defenseless population? How many more children will become anaphylactic, be rushed to emergency fighting for their lives or die before something is done? Again, you've got it backwards. Vaccination doesn't make one defenseless: It enables the body to fight disease. And vaccinations work wonders. They have eliminated smallpox from the planet (except for some in storage under lock and key), almost totally eliminated measles from the US, cut down greatly on deaths from chicken pox, almost totally prevented rubella-related birth defects, decreased greatly meningitis from invasive Hib bacteria and have prevent other diseases as well. Very few children have anaphylactic reactions to vaccines. Something is being done: The drug companies are required to show that the vaccines are safe and effective. And physicians are required to report adverse events that occur after a vaccine is given. Jeff |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Anaphylactic children
"Jeff" wrote in message nk.net... Again, you've got it backwards. Vaccination doesn't make one defenseless: It enables the body to fight disease. And vaccinations work wonders. They have eliminated smallpox from the planet (except for some in storage under lock and key), almost totally eliminated measles from the US, cut down greatly on deaths from chicken pox, almost totally prevented rubella-related birth defects, decreased greatly meningitis from invasive Hib bacteria and have prevent other diseases as well. Very few children have anaphylactic reactions to vaccines. Something is being done: The drug companies are required to show that the vaccines are safe and effective. And physicians are required to report adverse events that occur after a vaccine is given. Jeff Yes, all true in Allopath Land http://www.mercola.com/townofallopat...ofallopath.htm say high to Big ears |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Anaphylactic children
"john" wrote in message ... "Jeff" wrote in message nk.net... Again, you've got it backwards. Vaccination doesn't make one defenseless: It enables the body to fight disease. And vaccinations work wonders. They have eliminated smallpox from the planet (except for some in storage under lock and key), almost totally eliminated measles from the US, cut down greatly on deaths from chicken pox, almost totally prevented rubella-related birth defects, decreased greatly meningitis from invasive Hib bacteria and have prevent other diseases as well. Very few children have anaphylactic reactions to vaccines. Something is being done: The drug companies are required to show that the vaccines are safe and effective. And physicians are required to report adverse events that occur after a vaccine is given. Jeff Yes, all true in Allopath Land http://www.mercola.com/townofallopat...ofallopath.htm say high to Big ears That's the best comeback you can do. How sad. What I said is true in real life. And backed by real science. Jeff |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Vaccines HAVE to go, there can be no compromise on this issue.
Jeff wrote;
1. Vaccines save lives. 2. Vaccines strengthen the defence system. 3. Drug companies ensure that vaccines are safe. 4. Vaccines are based upon "real" science. 5. Very few children suffer vaccine reactions. 6. Doctors take care of adverse reactions. I repeat ad infinitum; 1. That vaccines save lives is disputed by statistics available. The diseases vaccines "saved us" from were already on the wane when the vaccines were introduced. When an epidemic strikes it is always advisable to go to the root of the problem (usually hygiene, nutrition, individual immuno deficiency) than waste time on vaccinations that create a false sense of security and exacerbate the next epidemic by reducing the immunity of the population. 2. Vaccines do not strengthen the defence system, they weaken it. This is why babies start suffering from fevers, colds, diarrhoea, dysentery, irritable behaviour after the vaccines are delivered. You cannot make a person more healthy than he is by introducing in him the dangerous vaccine contents. 3. Drug companies ensure their survival and profits. The FDA has only today sought to clear itself of the allegations of misdemeanour against it. Some of its officials have argued that it is "normal" to do research with funds from the drug industry. Then why the huge uproar about the fundings of Dr Wakefields research? The next time they will say that it is "normal" to fudge reports and allow dangerous drugs and vaccines into the market. 4. Vaccines do not conform to any science. It is a bluff that the medical industry does not want to disown. They have taken a serious risk by continuing with vaccinations and now they just have to support it fearing backlash if they don't. The vaccines also help the peds and politicians earn their big fat incomes. 5. Very few children suffer vaccine reactions? Has the entire data in all the countries where vaccines are administered ever been compiled? The word "vaccine reaction" is not even uttered in public in Third World countries. Children in these countries suffer "polio like diseases", meningitis, encephalitis, auto immune disorders, shocks and seizures due to "fear of the vaccine process", irritability, bowel pains, etc. after getting the shots. The deaths are often put down as "deaths due to malnourishment". There are never any vaccine reactions or deaths. 6. Vaccine reactions are rarely acknowledged by doctors until they are threatened with legal actions or are reported to the police. Then they blame the vaccine storage process, the particular batch being faulty, wrong administration etc. I am personally yet to come across any doctor in India who admits in public that vaccines can cause disease and death. Four years ago, in the year 2002, an Indian doctor had gone to the press with the information. He has since been "suitably chastised". The vaccine supporters have blood on their hands. Unless vaccines are stopped, chemical toxins are stopped, suppressive medication is stopped, and the doctors are taught holistic healing methods, the population of the world can never hope to acquire good health. This has been proved by the developments in the last 200 odd years of allopathic dominance where we see crisis after crisis on an worsening scale. Regards, Jagannath, Vaccine victim. Jeff wrote: Again, you've got it backwards. Vaccination doesn't make one defenseless: It enables the body to fight disease. And vaccinations work wonders. They have eliminated smallpox from the planet (except for some in storage under lock and key), almost totally eliminated measles from the US, cut down greatly on deaths from chicken pox, almost totally prevented rubella-related birth defects, decreased greatly meningitis from invasive Hib bacteria and have prevent other diseases as well. Very few children have anaphylactic reactions to vaccines. Something is being done: The drug companies are required to show that the vaccines are safe and effective. And physicians are required to report adverse events that occur after a vaccine is given. Jeff |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Vaccines HAVE to go, there can be no compromise on this issue.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Vaccines HAVE to go, there can be no compromise on this issue.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Vaccines HAVE to go, there can be no compromise on this issue.
wrote in message ups.com... Jeff wrote; 1. Vaccines save lives. 2. Vaccines strengthen the defence system. 3. Drug companies ensure that vaccines are safe. 4. Vaccines are based upon "real" science. 5. Very few children suffer vaccine reactions. 6. Doctors take care of adverse reactions. I repeat ad infinitum; 1. That vaccines save lives is disputed by statistics available. The diseases vaccines "saved us" from were already on the wane when the vaccines were introduced. When an epidemic strikes it is always advisable to go to the root of the problem (usually hygiene, nutrition, individual immuno deficiency) than waste time on vaccinations that create a false sense of security and exacerbate the next epidemic by reducing the immunity of the population. Unfortunately, what you don't understand is that the root of the problem is that viruses and bacteria cause illness. Hygiene and nutrition help prevent disease, for sure. But that doesn't explain why vaccines work so well in areas with horrible hygiene and nutrition or why areas with excellent hygiene and nutrition still have outbreaks of disease. And vaccines create true immunity to the particular diseases that vaccines protect against. 2. Vaccines do not strengthen the defence system, they weaken it. This is why babies start suffering from fevers, colds, diarrhoea, dysentery, irritable behaviour after the vaccines are delivered. You cannot make a person more healthy than he is by introducing in him the dangerous vaccine contents. Vaccines cause the body to create antibodies against particular diseases. That strengthens the immune system. Babies don't suffer any more from colds, diarrhea or dysentery. The fevers and irrable behavior after vaccines are short-lived and a result of the vaccines stimulating the immune system. You state that you can't make a person more healthy with vaccines. You can. If you consider a person who is less likely to die of a deadly disease more healthy. 3. Drug companies ensure their survival and profits. The FDA has only today sought to clear itself of the allegations of misdemeanour against it. Some of its officials have argued that it is "normal" to do research with funds from the drug industry. Then why the huge uproar about the fundings of Dr Wakefields research? The next time they will say that it is "normal" to fudge reports and allow dangerous drugs and vaccines into the market. The FDA has a lot of house-cleaning to do, for sure. But htat doesn't mean that vaccines don't work or save lives. 4. Vaccines do not conform to any science. It is a bluff that the medical industry does not want to disown. They have taken a serious risk by continuing with vaccinations and now they just have to support it fearing backlash if they don't. The vaccines also help the peds and politicians earn their big fat incomes. Vaccines work under the principles of immunology. You can read about vaccines he http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccines. There are links so you can learn about the immune system. 5. Very few children suffer vaccine reactions?\ True. Has the entire data in all the countries where vaccines are administered ever been compiled? Do you have the money to do this? Should we not save lives because we can't track every vaccine reaction? The word "vaccine reaction" is not even uttered in public in Third World countries. Children in these countries suffer "polio like diseases", meningitis, encephalitis, auto immune disorders, shocks and seizures due to "fear of the vaccine process", irritability, bowel pains, etc. after getting the shots. Yeah, but they suffer those problems a lot more before getting the vaccines. The reasons why they suffer those problems have to do with poverty, hygiene and nutrition. Vaccines get them valuable protection against particular diseases. The deaths are often put down as "deaths due to malnourishment". There are never any vaccine reactions or deaths. There are very few deaths due to vaccine reactions. And most of the people who die in 3rd and 4th world countries after getting vaccines would have died anyway. 6. Vaccine reactions are rarely acknowledged by doctors until they are threatened with legal actions or are reported to the police. Then they blame the vaccine storage process, the particular batch being faulty, wrong administration etc. I am personally yet to come across any doctor in India who admits in public that vaccines can cause disease and death. Four years ago, in the year 2002, an Indian doctor had gone to the press with the information. He has since been "suitably chastised". Correct. Vaccines rarely cause major illness or death. And they save many lives every year. The vaccine supporters have blood on their hands. Unless vaccines are stopped, chemical toxins are stopped, suppressive medication is stopped, and the doctors are taught holistic healing methods, the population of the world can never hope to acquire good health. This has been proved by the developments in the last 200 odd years of allopathic dominance where we see crisis after crisis on an worsening scale. The reality of life is that with everything we do, there are benefits and risk. When I go to school later today, I could get killed if the train crashes or crossing the street. If I stay home, I could get killed if there is a gas leak that causes an explosion. You have to weigh the risks and the benefits of everything. With vaccines, the benefits clearly outweight the risks. Look at the risks of smallpox today: There are none, thanks to vaccines. Jeff Regards, Jagannath, Vaccine victim. Jeff wrote: Again, you've got it backwards. Vaccination doesn't make one defenseless: It enables the body to fight disease. And vaccinations work wonders. They have eliminated smallpox from the planet (except for some in storage under lock and key), almost totally eliminated measles from the US, cut down greatly on deaths from chicken pox, almost totally prevented rubella-related birth defects, decreased greatly meningitis from invasive Hib bacteria and have prevent other diseases as well. Very few children have anaphylactic reactions to vaccines. Something is being done: The drug companies are required to show that the vaccines are safe and effective. And physicians are required to report adverse events that occur after a vaccine is given. Jeff |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Anaphylactic children
john writes:
http://www.whale.to/vaccines/hoffman.html With hundreds of new vaccines in the pipeline, how much longer can we continue to inject more and more foreign proteins via vaccination into human beings without eventually creating a totally defenseless population? How many more children will become anaphylactic, be rushed to emergency fighting for their lives or die before something is done? I'm not aware of any connection between immunization and any increased incidence of anaphylaxis. Vaccination works in much the same way as naturally acquired immunity. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
misc.kids FAQ on Firearms Safety & Children | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | May 21st 06 05:23 AM |
misc.kids FAQ on Firearms Safety & Children | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | April 20th 06 05:34 AM |
misc.kids FAQ on Firearms Safety & Children | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | May 30th 05 05:29 AM |
| | Kids should work... | Kane | Spanking | 12 | December 10th 03 02:30 AM |
Kids should work. | ChrisScaife | Spanking | 16 | December 7th 03 04:27 AM |