Vaccine used as bioweapon

In 1987, journalist Robert Lederer wrote about a vaccine against hog
cholera. The serum was developed from pig blood which turned out to be
tainted with African Swine Fever (ASF). "Thus," Lederer suggests, "during
mass [pig] vaccination programs, the tainted vaccine prevented hog cholera
but also induced ASF on a mass scale."
Ben Dupuy, editor of New York's Haiti Progress, told Lederer he believed
the hog cholera vaccine was intentionally introduced into Haiti to blast the
poor-peasant infrastructure. With the death of their pigs during the ensuing
ASF epidemic of 1979, Dupuy maintains peasants were forced to pay $100
apiece for new pigs brought in from the US. Of course, they couldn't afford
this. The idea was to drive peasants off their land into low-paying urban
jobs and, from the outside, establish a new Haitian economy (US controlled)
of huge farms and factories.
In this regard, Lederer also cites an article from the New York Native,
December 17,1984, in which Jane Teas (Harvard School of Public Health)
remarks that ASF first broke out in Haiti in a well-populated valley that
was due to be flooded, as part of a hydroelectric dam project. Rappoport,
Jon (Ownership of All Life p86)

you pharma shills http://www.whale.to/m/exp8.html

"CWatters" wrote in message
...

"john" wrote in message
...

In 1987, journalist Robert Lederer wrote about a vaccine against hog
cholera. tainted with African Swine Fever (ASF).

A somewhat more balanced view of this program can be found here...

http://www.webster.edu/~corbetre/hai...s/gaertner.htm

Quote:
No program has been subjected to more criticism than the IICA disease
eradication and pig repopulation project which took place in Haiti during
the past decade. The critics, though incessant in their assault, have done
a
poor job of presenting their case, giving us emotion, romance, and
mythology
when hard data is what is needed. Some critics have been so seriously in
error in their description of the disease that the suspicion that they
intended to deliberately misinform becomes valid. Others have attempted to
present folklore as fact, endowing the debate with an air of foolishness
resembling that of Chesterton's wise men.

"john" wrote in message
...


you pharma shills http://www.whale.to/m/exp8.html

Is that the best you can do?

How about some real evidence?

Namecalling doesn't count.

I do appreciate your referencing this joke site. It is clear that the author
doesn't have a clue about evidence, science or medicine. No wonder he
doesn't put his name on it.

Jeff