If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Tucson, Arizona -- Foster care, too often, is a toxic intervention:Gov. Janet Napolitano when she says we should ignore statistics showing thatthe number of children torn from their families...
Foster care, too often, is a toxic intervention
Tucson, Arizona | Published: 08.28.2007 http://www.azstarnet.com/sn/related/198354.php The Star supports Gov. Janet Napolitano when she says we should ignore statistics showing that the number of children torn from their families in Arizona has soared in recent years ("A statistic is a statistic, nothing more," Aug. 24). Presumably, she also wants to ignore the fact that systems recognized nationally for improving child safety take, proportionately, far fewer children than Arizona, and Pima County takes, proportionately, 50 percent more children than Maricopa County with no evidence that Pima children are safer. The only thing that counts, the governor says, is whether an individual decision makes children safer. Fortunately, all over the country, researchers have been examining exactly that. In one study, researchers examined children born with cocaine in their systems. Children left with birth mothers able to care for them developed better than those placed in foster care. That doesn't mean children should be left with addicts. It does mean that when a 3-year-old is found unsupervised in a filthy home and the mom is a meth addict, inpatient drug treatment for the mother, in a place where she can live with her child, almost always is a better first choice than foster care for the child. Methamphetamine is just as treatable — in the same time frames — as any other addiction. In another study, researchers interviewed hundreds of young adults who'd endured foster care. One-third reported being abused by a foster parent or another adult in a foster home. Only one in five was doing well in life. Two more studies compare outcomes for children placed in foster care directly to comparably maltreated children left in their own homes — including one comparing more than 15,000 children. Both found that, on average, children left in their own homes did significantly better. None of this means no child ever should be taken away. But these studies tell us that foster care is an enormously toxic intervention that should be used sparingly and in small doses. The statistics the governor wants us to ignore tell us that Arizona has been prescribing megadoses of foster care. Apparently, the governor wants us to ignore the studies and the statistics, while her allies dismiss individual cases as aberrations. We are simply supposed to trust the judgment of caseworkers. But the Department of Economic Security itself says those caseworkers are "an inexperienced workforce that is unable to deal with the complex issues present in the child-welfare system." There is a word for decisions made in haste by inexperienced, overwhelmed caseworkers: capricious. So even as they take more children needlessly, they overlook other children in real danger. That explains one statistic no one should igno 23. That's the number of children previously "known-to-the-system" who died in 2005. It's a number the take-the-child-and-run approach was supposed to reduce. Instead, that number, 23, is a record. The governor promised to put child safety ahead of family preservation, and gave the vulnerable children of Arizona neither. There also is a word for those who ignore individual cases, research and statistics as they perpetuate an approach that leaves more children in dangerous homes, even as it consigns many others to a system that churns out walking wounded four times out of five: irresponsible. Write to Richard Wexler at . The coalition's report on Arizona child welfare is available at www.nccpr.org CURRENTLY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES VIOLATES MORE CIVIL RIGHTS ON A DAILY BASIS THEN ALL OTHER AGENCIES COMBINED INCLUDING THE NSA / CIA WIRETAPPING PROGRAM.... CPS Does not protect children... It is sickening how many children are subject to abuse, neglect and even killed at the hands of Child Protective Services. every parent should read this .pdf from connecticut dcf watch... http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com/8x11.pdf http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com Number of Cases per 100,000 children in the US These numbers come from The National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect in Washington. (NCCAN) Recent numbers have increased significantly for CPS *Perpetrators of Maltreatment* Physical Abuse CPS 160, Parents 59 Sexual Abuse CPS 112, Parents 13 Neglect CPS 410, Parents 241 Medical Neglect CPS 14 Parents 12 Fatalities CPS 6.4, Parents 1.5 Imagine that, 6.4 children die at the hands of the very agencies that are supposed to protect them and only 1.5 at the hands of parents per 100,000 children. CPS perpetrates more abuse, neglect, and sexual abuse and kills more children then parents in the United States. If the citizens of this country hold CPS to the same standards that they hold parents too. No judge should ever put another child in the hands of ANY government agency because CPS nationwide is guilty of more harm and death than any human being combined. CPS nationwide is guilty of more human rights violations and deaths of children then the homes from which they were removed. When are the judges going to wake up and see that they are sending children to their death and a life of abuse when children are removed from safe homes based on the mere opinion of a bunch of social workers. CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, HAPPILY DESTROYING THOUSANDS OF INNOCENT FAMILIES YEARLY NATIONWIDE AND COMING TO YOU'RE HOME SOON... BE SURE TO FIND OUT WHERE YOUR CANDIDATES STANDS ON THE ISSUE OF REFORMING OR ABOLISHING CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES ("MAKE YOUR CANDIDATES TAKE A STAND ON THIS ISSUE.") THEN REMEMBER TO VOTE ACCORDINGLY IF THEY ARE "FAMILY UNFRIENDLY" IN THE NEXT ELECTION... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|