If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
Deadbeats
Zimm wrote:
I think that most of the men here really do want to support their children (emotionally and financially). It's the system of making that happen that ****es them off. No arguments with that. It is very far from perfect but I sure haven't come up with a better system. It's the 'absolute' statements that **** ME off: CP=Always a women NCP=Always a man With rare exceptions, that's the way the legal system awards it. Custody should always be 50% (my ex can't even take care of himself, let alone a child. And he doesn't want 50% anyway.) Your bigoted prejudice about your ex notwithstanding, children generally do better living with their fathers than their mothers. Having a child is solely the womans idea/ability/responsibility/problem (takes two to tango, remember?) Legally, ONLY women have "a woman's right to choose." Women also have a wide variety of contraceptive and other choices that men don't, due to a century of anti-men sexism. CP (who is always a woman) spends all the cs money on herself and doesn't spend a dime on the kids. Strawman. It's more correct to say that the money always gets paid to the CP, and not a dime gets paid to the kids. Woman is evil and should be killed and thrown off a bridge. (my personal favorite) Zimm Hmmmmm? I hadn't seen the "thrown off a bridge" suggestion. A fake suicide note and it could work at that. Thanks. Bob -- When did we divide into sides? "As president, I will put American government and our legal system back on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/ [Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.] |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
Deadbeats
Zimm wrote:
I think that most of the men here really do want to support their children (emotionally and financially). It's the system of making that happen that ****es them off. No arguments with that. It is very far from perfect but I sure haven't come up with a better system. It's the 'absolute' statements that **** ME off: CP=Always a women NCP=Always a man With rare exceptions, that's the way the legal system awards it. Custody should always be 50% (my ex can't even take care of himself, let alone a child. And he doesn't want 50% anyway.) Your bigoted prejudice about your ex notwithstanding, children generally do better living with their fathers than their mothers. Having a child is solely the womans idea/ability/responsibility/problem (takes two to tango, remember?) Legally, ONLY women have "a woman's right to choose." Women also have a wide variety of contraceptive and other choices that men don't, due to a century of anti-men sexism. CP (who is always a woman) spends all the cs money on herself and doesn't spend a dime on the kids. Strawman. It's more correct to say that the money always gets paid to the CP, and not a dime gets paid to the kids. Woman is evil and should be killed and thrown off a bridge. (my personal favorite) Zimm Hmmmmm? I hadn't seen the "thrown off a bridge" suggestion. A fake suicide note and it could work at that. Thanks. Bob -- When did we divide into sides? "As president, I will put American government and our legal system back on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/ [Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.] |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
Deadbeats
Zimm wrote:
I think that most of the men here really do want to support their children (emotionally and financially). It's the system of making that happen that ****es them off. No arguments with that. It is very far from perfect but I sure haven't come up with a better system. It's the 'absolute' statements that **** ME off: CP=Always a women NCP=Always a man With rare exceptions, that's the way the legal system awards it. Custody should always be 50% (my ex can't even take care of himself, let alone a child. And he doesn't want 50% anyway.) Your bigoted prejudice about your ex notwithstanding, children generally do better living with their fathers than their mothers. Having a child is solely the womans idea/ability/responsibility/problem (takes two to tango, remember?) Legally, ONLY women have "a woman's right to choose." Women also have a wide variety of contraceptive and other choices that men don't, due to a century of anti-men sexism. CP (who is always a woman) spends all the cs money on herself and doesn't spend a dime on the kids. Strawman. It's more correct to say that the money always gets paid to the CP, and not a dime gets paid to the kids. Woman is evil and should be killed and thrown off a bridge. (my personal favorite) Zimm Hmmmmm? I hadn't seen the "thrown off a bridge" suggestion. A fake suicide note and it could work at that. Thanks. Bob -- When did we divide into sides? "As president, I will put American government and our legal system back on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/ [Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.] |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
Deadbeats
Bob Whiteside wrote: "Zimm" wrote in message ... I think that most of the men here really do want to support their children (emotionally and financially). It's the system of making that happen that ****es them off. No arguments with that. It is very far from perfect but I sure haven't come up with a better system. It's the 'absolute' statements that **** ME off: CP=Always a women NCP=Always a man Custody should always be 50% (my ex can't even take care of himself, let alone a child. And he doesn't want 50% anyway.) Having a child is solely the womans idea/ability/responsibility/problem (takes two to tango, remember?) CP (who is always a woman) spends all the cs money on herself and doesn't spend a dime on the kids. Woman is evil and should be killed and thrown off a bridge. (my personal favorite) You left out a few: Men won't support their own flesh and blood. Men aren't interested in parenting. All men are deadbeats. Having sex with a woman is consent to becoming a father. If men don't want children they should wear condoms even if the woman claims to be using birth control. Fathers quit their jobs to avoid paying CS. Fathers who don't pay CS deserve to go to jail. Fathers only want joint custody to reduce CS payments. If it wasn't for all the CS enforcement fathers wouldn't pay. There's more, but you get the point. You are absolutely correct. Got some good ones in there. My ex does fit into a few of those categories but (Thank Goodness!) most men do not. I do think men should always wear condoms, though. It's just the smart thing to do. Prevents babies and cooties. Zimm |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
Deadbeats
Bob Whiteside wrote: "Zimm" wrote in message ... I think that most of the men here really do want to support their children (emotionally and financially). It's the system of making that happen that ****es them off. No arguments with that. It is very far from perfect but I sure haven't come up with a better system. It's the 'absolute' statements that **** ME off: CP=Always a women NCP=Always a man Custody should always be 50% (my ex can't even take care of himself, let alone a child. And he doesn't want 50% anyway.) Having a child is solely the womans idea/ability/responsibility/problem (takes two to tango, remember?) CP (who is always a woman) spends all the cs money on herself and doesn't spend a dime on the kids. Woman is evil and should be killed and thrown off a bridge. (my personal favorite) You left out a few: Men won't support their own flesh and blood. Men aren't interested in parenting. All men are deadbeats. Having sex with a woman is consent to becoming a father. If men don't want children they should wear condoms even if the woman claims to be using birth control. Fathers quit their jobs to avoid paying CS. Fathers who don't pay CS deserve to go to jail. Fathers only want joint custody to reduce CS payments. If it wasn't for all the CS enforcement fathers wouldn't pay. There's more, but you get the point. You are absolutely correct. Got some good ones in there. My ex does fit into a few of those categories but (Thank Goodness!) most men do not. I do think men should always wear condoms, though. It's just the smart thing to do. Prevents babies and cooties. Zimm |
#106
|
|||
|
|||
Deadbeats
Bob Whiteside wrote: "Zimm" wrote in message ... I think that most of the men here really do want to support their children (emotionally and financially). It's the system of making that happen that ****es them off. No arguments with that. It is very far from perfect but I sure haven't come up with a better system. It's the 'absolute' statements that **** ME off: CP=Always a women NCP=Always a man Custody should always be 50% (my ex can't even take care of himself, let alone a child. And he doesn't want 50% anyway.) Having a child is solely the womans idea/ability/responsibility/problem (takes two to tango, remember?) CP (who is always a woman) spends all the cs money on herself and doesn't spend a dime on the kids. Woman is evil and should be killed and thrown off a bridge. (my personal favorite) You left out a few: Men won't support their own flesh and blood. Men aren't interested in parenting. All men are deadbeats. Having sex with a woman is consent to becoming a father. If men don't want children they should wear condoms even if the woman claims to be using birth control. Fathers quit their jobs to avoid paying CS. Fathers who don't pay CS deserve to go to jail. Fathers only want joint custody to reduce CS payments. If it wasn't for all the CS enforcement fathers wouldn't pay. There's more, but you get the point. You are absolutely correct. Got some good ones in there. My ex does fit into a few of those categories but (Thank Goodness!) most men do not. I do think men should always wear condoms, though. It's just the smart thing to do. Prevents babies and cooties. Zimm |
#107
|
|||
|
|||
Deadbeats
Zimm wrote:
I do think men should always wear condoms, though. It's just the smart thing to do. Prevents babies and cooties. Zimm So did you ever use a female condom? I though not. More sexism. Pathetic. Bob -- When did we divide into sides? "As president, I will put American government and our legal system back on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/ [Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.] |
#108
|
|||
|
|||
Deadbeats
Zimm wrote:
I do think men should always wear condoms, though. It's just the smart thing to do. Prevents babies and cooties. Zimm So did you ever use a female condom? I though not. More sexism. Pathetic. Bob -- When did we divide into sides? "As president, I will put American government and our legal system back on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/ [Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.] |
#109
|
|||
|
|||
Deadbeats
Zimm wrote:
I do think men should always wear condoms, though. It's just the smart thing to do. Prevents babies and cooties. Zimm So did you ever use a female condom? I though not. More sexism. Pathetic. Bob -- When did we divide into sides? "As president, I will put American government and our legal system back on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/ [Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.] |
#110
|
|||
|
|||
Deadbeats
"Bob" wrote in message ... Zimm wrote: I do think men should always wear condoms, though. It's just the smart thing to do. Prevents babies and cooties. Zimm So did you ever use a female condom? I though not. More sexism. Pathetic. OK, Bob, let's say it this way: The man and the woman should each take responsibility for his/her own birth control. That way, if one is being dishonest, the other won't get a nasty surprise. How does that sound? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Deadbeats | frankjones | Child Support | 57 | April 18th 04 01:05 AM |
Cox Strategy Targets Child Support Deadbeats | Fighting for kids | Child Support | 75 | November 14th 03 09:07 AM |
Deadbeats here to stay | Fighting for kids | Child Support | 0 | November 8th 03 01:50 AM |