If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
SPANKING MYTHS
Eight Dangerous Myths About Spanking
By Debra L. Stang, LCSW A few nights ago, I was talking to a friend when the subject of spanking came up. I could not have been more surprised when her first response was, "I can't say I'm totally against it. What if a two year old is crawling for a hot stove?" This is not an uninformed woman. She and I both cut our clinical teeth working with victims of domestic violence, child abuse, and sexual assault. We have seen over and over the harm and damage caused by interpersonal violence. Yet for some reason, she is still not able to set aside the old wives' tale which holds that spanking, unlike any other form of hitting, is a benign practice. I'm sorry to say my response to my friend wasn't a particularly enlightening one. I managed to gasp out one or two rebuttals, but mostly, I just stammered in shock. The confrontation, and my response to it, got me thinking about the most common myths people use to justify hitting children. In this article, I've examined eight of those myths and I've provided the researched, reasoned responses I wish I'd had ready for my friend. Myth #1. Being spanked never hurt anybody. This makes little sense for many reasons. First, the whole idea of spanking is to inflict at least temporary pain. People who advocate spanking are well aware of this. For instance, James Dobson, founder of Focus on the Family and unapologetic advocate of spanking, has noted that "pain is a marvelous purifier" (qtd. in Greven, 1991, p. 68). Other spanking advocates have recommended corporal punishment severe enough to leave redness, welts, and even bruises on the child's skin (Greven, 1991, pp. 79-80). Since most children are spanked on the buttocks-a part of the body they have been told is "private"-they feel shame and humiliation as well, along with an uncertainty about how "private" that part of their body truly is (Johnson, 2001). But even beyond the mortification and the physical hurt, there is a longer-lasting emotional pain. Among many other negative outcomes, being spanked has been linked to: Low self esteem (Bryan & Freed, 1982) Depression (Straus, 1994) Masochism (Straus & Donnelly, 1994) Psychological Distress (Turner & Finkelhor, 1996) Myth #2: I was spanked, and I'm okay. Most smokers never develop cancer, most drunk drivers don't get into wrecks, and most children who grow up in homes with lead paint do not suffer brain damage. But no intelligent adult would seriously advocate smoking, driving drunk, or using lead-based paint to decorate their walls. There's also one more thing to consider. Most people who were spanked are "okay" in the sense that they aren't in prisons or psychiatric facilities. However, corporal punishment is handed down from one generation to the next. Compared to people who were not spanked, people who were spanked as children are more likely to spank their own kids (Muller, Hunter, & Stollak, 1995). Let's put that in plain English: People who were hit when they were vulnerable children are more likely to think it is acceptable-even desirable-for a fully grown adult to use painful physical force against a small child. How okay is that? Myth #3: Some children need a good, hard spanking. Let's look at who really benefits from the spanking. The child? No. Other interventions work just as well in the short term and better in the long term. Furthermore, the spanked child is put at risk for many negative consequences (see Myths 1, 5 and 8). Rather, it's the parent who benefits, in two ways. First, the parent achieves immediate results-results which could also be gotten through non-violent methods. Second, the physical punishment gives the parent a release of anger and tension-a kind of catharsis. Using a non-violent form of discipline such as time out or even a verbal command ("Don't touch!") will alter the child's behavior just as effectively, but it won't provide the parent with the same degree of emotional release (Carey, 1994). In other words, parents continue to spank because spanking meets some of their own misguided needs. It does not benefit the child. Myth #4: Spanking is the best way to stop dangerous behavior in toddlers. Small children have short attention spans when it comes to long lists of rules. Spanking may stop the behavior in the moment, but not any more effectively than non-violent discipline (e.g., time-out, saying "no," etc.). With toddlers no method of discipline, including spanking, works reliably for more than a couple of hours (Larzelere, Schneider, Larson, & Pike, 1996). There are only two ways to keep toddlers safe. The first is adjusting the environment (for instance, keeping sharp objects locked away or out of the child's reach, or building a fence around the back yard to provide a safe play area). The second is providing careful, loving, and nonviolent supervision. Myth #5: Being spanked keeps children out of trouble. Being spanked has consistently been linked with aggressive behavior (Frick, Christian, & Wootton, 1999), including domestic violence (Simons, Lin, & Gordon, 1998) and cruelty to animals (Flynn, 1999). Jordan Riak, who works with convicted felons, has noted that close to 99% of the men in his groups report being spanked as children (personal communication, 1/9/02). If the goal is keeping children out of trouble, spanking is clearly not the way to go. There is another problem as well. While spanking may teach some children to avoid certain behaviors out of fear of punishment, it does not teach the child to think about what is right and what is wrong. Rather, it teaches the child to ask, "Will I get caught?" and "Will I be punished?" Spanked children do not learn to measure their behaviors against their own moral beliefs. Rather, they rely blindly on the judgment of those in authority-those who have the power to punish. If the person in authority gives unethical orders, the results can be tragic. It is no coincidence that a society where physical punishment was the norm gave rise to the most shameful words of the twentieth century: "I was only following orders." Myth #6: Nothing but spanking works on some children. First, let's look at the child's age. If the child is a toddler, for instance, no method of discipline, including spanking, is going to reliably curb certain behaviors for more than an hour or two at a time. The frustrated parent may get some emotional payoff from the spanking. The child will only be harmed. Second, were the alternative methods of discipline being used correctly? I once spoke with a client who told me she "had" to spank her four-year-old daughter because the child wouldn't stay in her time-out chair. The length of the time-out? Four hours! No child can be expected to sit still for four hours with no diversion-to demand it is abuse. While it is beyond the scope of this article to discuss the vast number of successful non-violent methods of discipline and how to use them, many parenting websites and books do just that. A quick search of the internet or the local library will provide dozens of effective alternatives to spanking. Finally, some parents misperceive the actual value of spanking. They may, for instance, spank their child repeatedly for the same misbehavior, but declare time-out or some other non-violent means of discipline a failure when it does not stop the problem behavior after only one trial. The research, meanwhile, is clear: even in the very short term, spanking does not work any better than non-violent means of discipline such as explanation, time out, or verbal command (Larzelere, Sather, Schneider, Larson, & Pike, 1998; Roberts & Powers, 1990). There is no reason to strike a child. Ever. Myth #7: Spanking isn't hitting or violence-it's discipline. Imagine this scenario: an aide at a nursing home for Alzheimer's patients discovers an elderly woman poking at an electrical outlet. The aide immediately slaps the woman hard across the buttocks several times, reducing the woman to tears. Has the woman been hit? Most of us would agree that she has. Has she been a victim of violence? Most of us would agree to that, also. Furthermore, even though there is no permanent injury to her physical being, every state in the United States would define what happened to the woman as abuse. The aide would certainly lose her job and might face criminal charges as well; the facility would be in danger of losing its license. But substitute "two-year-old" for "elderly woman" and "parent" for "nursing home aide" and all of a sudden, our perceptions change. The hitting and the violence become a "spanking" and even some of the most dedicated child rights activists start referring to the incident as "sub-abusive." Why? The two-year-old is equally hurt and humiliated by the blows; he or she is no better able to defend against them; and he or she is not more likely to get any benefit from them. The fact that our society has arbitrarily decided to offer protection to one victim and withhold it from the other does not alter the truth: spanking is hitting and it is violent. Myth #8: Spanking is not harmful if it's done by loving, supportive parents. If anything, it may be even more distressing for a child to feel loved and supported by the very people who perpetrate violence against him or her. The child could learn to confuse love with violence, or to believe that it is okay to use force in the context of close, loving relationships. Or, the child could begin to feel worthless and believe he or she deserves physical violence. Not surprisingly, the research shows that the negative effects of spanking persist, even among loving and supportive families. The negative effects that have been studied in the context of family support include antisocial behavior and conduct problems (Frick, Christian, & Woottton, 1999; Gunnoe & Mariner, 1997), teen dating violence (Simons, Lin, & Gordon, 1998), masochism (Straus & Donnelly, 1994), and psychological distress (Turner & Finkelhor, 1996). The research is clear and has been for some time: Spanking causes harm. No matter how or why it is administered, it is not benign or beneficial. It is physical violence. And, like any other type of physical violence, spanking scars its victims emotionally. We have spent too many years ignoring the research and accepting the myths about spanking without bothering to investigate them fully. The time has come to confront these myths and stop finding excuses to hit children. References Bryan, J. W., & Freed, F. W. (1982). Corporal punishment: Normative data and sociological and psychological correlates in a community college population. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 11, 77-87. Carey, T. A. (1994). Spare the rod and spoil the child: Is this a sensible justification for the use of punishment in child rearing? Child Abuse & Neglect, 18(12), 1005-1010. Flynn, C. P. (1999). Exploring the link between corporal punishment and children's cruelty to animals. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 971-981. Frick, P. J., Christian, R. E., & Wootton, J. M. (1999). Age trends in the association between parenting practices and conduct problems. Behavior Modification, 23(1), 106-128. Gunnoe, M. L., & Mariner, C. L. (1997). Towards a developmental-contextual model of the effects of parental spanking on children's aggression. Archives in Pediatric Adolescent Medicine, 151, 768-775. Johnson, T. (2001). The sexual dangers of spanking children (2nd ed.) [Booklet]. Alamo, CA: PTAVE. Larzelere, R. E., Sather, P. R., Schneider, W. N., Larson, D. L., & Pike, P. L. (1998). Punishment enhances reasoning's effectiveness as a disciplinary response to toddlers. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 388-403. Larzelere, R. E., Schneider, W. N., Larson, D. B., & Pike, P. L. (1996). The effects of discipline responses in delaying toddler misbehavior recurrences. Child and Family Therapy, 18, 35-37. Muller, R. T., Hunter, J. E., & Stollak, G. (1995). The intergenerational transmission of corporal punishment: A comparison of social learning and temperament models. Child Abuse & Neglect, 19(11), 1323-1335. Roberts, M. W., & Powers, S. W. (1990). Adjusting chair timeout enforcement procedures for oppositional children. Behavior Therapy, 21, 257-271. Simons, R. L., Lin, K., & Gordon, L. C. (1998). Socialization in the family of origin and male dating violence: A prospective study. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 467-478. Straus, M. A. (Ed.). (1994). Beating the devil out of them: Corporal punishment in American families and its effect on children. Boston: Lexington. Straus, M. A., & Donnelly, D. A. (1994). The fusion of sex and violence. In M. A. Straus (Ed.), Beating the devil out of them: Corporal punishment in American families (pp. 121-136). Boston: Lexington. Turner, H. A., & Finkelhor, D. (1996). Corporal punishment as a stressor among youth. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 155-166. --- Project NoSpank at www.nospank.net ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
SPANKING MYTHS
On Sun, 03 Aug 2008 21:39:35 -0400, Ivan Gowch wrote:
Eight Dangerous Myths About Spanking Ivan - your obsession with sex, spanking, and children is creepy to say the least. Would be nice if you could post your spanking rants to the appropriate newsgroups ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
SPANKING MYTHS
"Ivan Gowch" wrote in message ... Eight Dangerous Myths About Spanking By Debra L. Stang, LCSW Spanking To be honest with you Eric, it's not a subject I normally comment on, because my views on this are seen as contrary to my purposes as a foster parent. Not that I have never commented on it, but it is very rare that I do. Personally, I am of the opinion that the individuals involved in this debate are all guilty of lying to try and prove their point. All you have to do is read the posts to come to the same conclusion. I don't believe that I want to get involved in an argument where so much untruth is found. Historically, corporal punishment has been a staple of child rearing. 20,000 years or more of parents correcting inappropriate behaviors by using natures own behavior modification system. And it has worked. We are where we are as a species because we use those methods that prove reliable, and those things that are a natural part of being human. Pain is the best behavior modifier ever known. It is built into the human body and we depend on it every minute of every day to tell us when we are doing something that we should not be doing. It works, period. Always has, always will. 20,000 years of testing, and while its not quite perfect, as nothing is, it is effective. The auspices of psychology cannot say the same thing. They are still in the infant / testing stage of their theories in comparison. There are many theories and studies out there, but none can say with certainty, or anything close to it, that the methods they recommend are as or more effective. Psychologists stumble and bumble around, trying to understand the human mind, pronouncing findings from short term studies, as if they actually know what they are talking about. But, when one is finally pined down without any wiggle room, they all admit that their theories are just that, theories. Unproven, and unproveable. But the individuals that post to these news groups sure feel free to make the claim of fact. It is my opinion that all this psychological parenting is the DIRECT cause of many of our societies problems. Rampant teen crime, growing child abuse rates, a general failure to accept responsibility for one's own actions, etc.. These have been issues throughout time, but most certainly not of the scale we "enjoy" today, and until recently have been at a manageable level. That is no longer true. But, as with anything, corporal punishment has its place and time. There are times when it is effective, and times when it is counterproductive. A good parent learns to distinguish between the two, and apply the best correction technique for the situation. Some people never learn this subtle lesson, hence we get child abuse or out of control children. We have spent too many years ignoring the research and accepting the myths about spanking without bothering to investigate them fully. The time has come to confront these myths and stop finding excuses to hit children. The truth cannot be hidden by the use of limited studies, targeted research, and rhetoric. Look at the facts, all of them, and then come to an appropriate conclusion. Ron |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
SPANKING MYTHS
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 10:42:10 -0500, "Ron"
wrote: [snip] ==Historically, corporal punishment has been a staple of child rearing. 20,000 ==years or more of parents correcting inappropriate behaviors by using natures ==own behavior modification system. And it has worked. You bet. It has always worked to produce adults who are, variously, timid or aggressive, neurotic, violent, resentful of authority or unnaturally fearful of authority, and prone to inflict abuse on their own offspring. Subjecting a child to violence of any kind is always wrong, always counter-productive, always harmful. It is perpetrated only by incompetents, cowards and perverts. ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Five Myths about No-Fault Divorce | Dusty | Child Support | 0 | June 3rd 08 10:39 PM |
Common myths-Thimerosal | SumBuny | Kids Health | 17 | April 10th 08 08:21 AM |
The facts and the myths.. | Dusty | Child Support | 0 | September 15th 05 02:45 AM |
breastfeeding myths | Shell | Breastfeeding | 11 | February 24th 04 01:49 AM |
FAO: Charlotte M. - Breastfeeding Myths | P. G. Chavez | Breastfeeding | 3 | August 1st 03 01:22 AM |