If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Good-Bye Germ Theory by Dr. William Trebing
On Tue, 5 Jan 2010 08:57:30 -0000, "john" wrote:
"Peter Parry" wrote in message Those are mostly from the 1870's, one from 1799. I think you will find science has moved on a bit since then. It's called history, and smallpox vax started around 1790's, and we all know why you want to forget the first 100 years of that There are many parts of early medical history which are now sufficiently outlandish as to have no relevance to modern medicine. Surgery in the 1800's bears little relevance to the same skill today. The same is true of most human endeavours. The historical perspective is interesting of course in that it shows how learning can develop and in particular how the scientific method initially developed by Alhazen, Bacon and Descartes can bring about progress. History can inform such as when you compare the progress of conventional medicine with its continuous learning and improvement to that of the likes of Homeopathy where unproven ideas from the late 1700's which should long ago have been consigned to the dustbin of history hang on being followed blindly in a quasi religious fashion rather than evolving. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Good-Bye Germ Theory by Dr. William Trebing
"Peter Parry" wrote in message ... On Tue, 5 Jan 2010 08:57:30 -0000, "john" wrote: "Peter Parry" wrote in message Those are mostly from the 1870's, one from 1799. I think you will find science has moved on a bit since then. It's called history, and smallpox vax started around 1790's, and we all know why you want to forget the first 100 years of that There are many parts of early medical history which are now sufficiently outlandish as to have no relevance to modern medicine. Surgery in the 1800's bears little relevance to the same skill today. The same is true of most human endeavours. The historical perspective is interesting of course in that it shows how learning can develop and in particular how the scientific method initially developed by Alhazen, Bacon and Descartes can bring about progress. History can inform such as when you compare the progress of conventional medicine with its continuous learning and improvement to that of the likes of Homeopathy where unproven ideas from the late 1700's which should long ago have been consigned to the dustbin of history hang on being followed blindly in a quasi religious fashion rather than evolving. avoidance of the first 100 years of smallpox vax. This is 1918 http://www.whale.to/vaccines/smallpox7.html so you can imagine what the previous 118 years were like, and don't foget Jenner is hailed as a hero and vax successful from day one vaccination should have been consigned to the quackpot ideas of the 19th century, but too much money was involved http://www.whale.to/vaccines/smallpox20.html and allopaths still claim an 18% death rate when Sydenham had a 2% rate in 1600's, what does that tell you about your scientific method bull****? and Semmelweis found out the true story of medical method http://www.whale.to/a/semmelweis_h.html his ideas were rejected for over 10 years just like the vitamin C cure for infections, 59 years now, so save us the religuius medical method bull**** "In a recent letter from Dr. A. Ward of the Pathology Department, University of Hong Kong, in which he requests permission to use some of our findings in his textbook on immunology, Dr. Ward states: "I again like you do not worship Louis Pasteur and I consider Edward Jenner to be one of the great criminals of history.' "---Dr Kalokerinos |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Good-Bye Germ Theory by Dr. William Trebing
On Tue, 5 Jan 2010 11:50:35 -0000, "john" wrote:
"Peter Parry" wrote History can inform such as when you compare the progress of conventional medicine with its continuous learning and improvement to that of the likes of Homeopathy where unproven ideas from the late 1700's which should long ago have been consigned to the dustbin of history hang on being followed blindly in a quasi religious fashion rather than evolving. avoidance of the first 100 years of smallpox vax. There is nothing to avoid. Why are you so concerned about events in the late 1800's? Had you had your appendix out in those days you would probably have died. Should this be a cause of concern for someone facing an appendectomy today? I can understand Homeopaths being concerned because they still work from a textbook written in the early 1800's but no one else does. This is 1918 http://www.whale.to/vaccines/smallpox7.html so you can imagine what the previous 118 years were like, and don't foget Jenner is hailed as a hero and vax successful from day one That is because it was. It has become far more successful since then. You need to understand that a science is a continuous process of improvement and learning. and allopaths still claim an 18% death rate when Sydenham had a 2% rate in 1600's, what does that tell you about your scientific method bull****? It tells me one should not rely upon partial records from 1600. Just how complete and accurate do you think a document from 1600 is likely to be? and Semmelweis found out the true story of medical method http://www.whale.to/a/semmelweis_h.html his ideas were rejected for over 10 years But eventually accepted after Pasteur, 15 years later confirmed the germ theory. Science is not necessarily a straight track with no bumps but it is the only way of achieving real progress. just like the vitamin C cure for infections, 59 years now, so save us the religuius medical method bull**** Which vitamin C cure for infections is this? "In a recent letter from Dr. A. Ward of the Pathology Department, University of Hong Kong, in which he requests permission to use some of our findings in his textbook on immunology, Dr. Ward states: "I again like you do not worship Louis Pasteur and I consider Edward Jenner to be one of the great criminals of history.' "---Dr Kalokerinos Even assuming this is true it is completely meaningless out of context. Which letter? Where can it be found? What was it discussing? Who is Dr A Ward? There is no Dr Ward listed at the Pathology Dept at Hong Kong University, there appears to be no textbook on immunology written by an A Ward. We know Kalokerinos is someone who believes vaccination is a deliberate process of genocide carried out under the auspices of the World Health Organization and the Save the Children Fund.who, he thinks, "put Hitler and Stalin in the shade" when it came to deliberate and intentional mass killings. He bases his claims on the idea that needles are reused (they are generally not) in order to deliberately spread AIDS. Forty odd years ago he also successfully diagnosed and treated vitamin C deficiency in Australian aboriginal children whose "natural" diet wasn't providing sufficient. Once again your infatuation with attacking people rather than addressing the science is letting you down. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Good-Bye Germ Theory by Dr. William Trebing | john[_5_] | Kids Health | 30 | January 3rd 10 12:24 AM |
The Pentagon Germ = AIDS ! | [email protected] | General | 0 | October 7th 07 09:52 PM |
The Pentagon Germ = AIDS ! Time Sensitive, Pass it on. | [email protected] | Pregnancy | 0 | July 8th 07 09:45 PM |
The Pentagon Germ = AIDS ! Time Sensitive, Pass it on. | [email protected] | Breastfeeding | 0 | July 8th 07 09:44 PM |
The Pentagon Germ = AIDS ! Time Sensitive, Pass it on. | [email protected] | General | 0 | July 8th 07 09:43 PM |