Bravo Illinois ... Mercury-Free Vaccine Act.

Eric Bohlman wrote:
Mark Probert wrote in
:


Section 5. Banned mercury-containing vaccines.
(a) Commencing January 1, 2006, a person shall not be
vaccinated with a mercury-containing vaccine that contains
more than 1.25 micrograms of mercury per dose.


This provision is at least rational, though whether it's necessary is
debatable.


(b) Commencing January 1, 2008, no person shall be
vaccinated with a vaccine or injected with any product that
contains, or prior to dilution, had contained as an additive,
any mercury based product, whether at preservative or trace
amount levels.


But this one represents a descent into magical thinking, specifically the
concept of "contagious magic" (the idea that thing A is permanently altered
in some way by coming into contact with thing B, even though nothing of
thing B remains). It also explicitly denies the scientific concept of the
dose making the poison.

They are legislators, not scientists. What do you expect?

"Mark Probert" wrote in message
...
Rich.@. wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 21:26:46 GMT, "LadyLollipop"
wrote:


Poor, pathetic Mark Probert.


Jan Drew aka Lady Lollipop says it is ALWAYS wrong to belittle. Jan
Drew's hypocrisy knows no bounds.

Is Jan Drew the subject of this thread?

Poor cyberstalker, *hypocrite* Richard H Jacobson, still attacking me

R...@. Aug 29, 2:06 pm


Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 5 days (Sep 5, 2:06 pm).


On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 19:03:18 GMT, "LadyLollipop"



wrote:
Actually, it is Martk Thorson who is guilty on ALL COUNTS!!!!!!!


Is Mark Thorson the subject of this thread?


snip


Aloha,

Rich

PS: Cue Jan Drew to start a new thread attacking me.

-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------

Best defense to logic is ignorance

In article ,
Eric Bohlman wrote:


(b) Commencing January 1, 2008, no person shall be
vaccinated with a vaccine or injected with any product that
contains, or prior to dilution, had contained as an additive,
any mercury based product, whether at preservative or trace
amount levels.

But this one represents a descent into magical thinking, specifically the
concept of "contagious magic" (the idea that thing A is permanently altered
in some way by coming into contact with thing B, even though nothing of
thing B remains). It also explicitly denies the scientific concept of the
dose making the poison.

I'm interested in how they define "trace amount." Does that mean one
mercury atom in a vial is too much?

--
Orac |"I am not *trying* to tell you anything. I am simply not
| interested in trying to compensate for your amazing lack
| of observation."
| http://oracknows.blogspot.com

LadyLollipop wrote:
"Mark Probert" wrote in message
...

Rich.@. wrote:

On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 21:26:46 GMT, "LadyLollipop"
wrote:



Poor, pathetic Mark Probert.


Jan Drew aka Lady Lollipop says it is ALWAYS wrong to belittle. Jan
Drew's hypocrisy knows no bounds.


Is Jan Drew the subject of this thread?

Yes, whenever you post, the thread becomes about Jan Drew.

"Mark Probert" wrote in message
...
LadyLollipop wrote:
"Mark Probert" wrote in message
...

Rich.@. wrote:

On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 21:26:46 GMT, "LadyLollipop"
wrote:



Poor, pathetic Mark Probert.


Jan Drew aka Lady Lollipop says it is ALWAYS wrong to belittle. Jan
Drew's hypocrisy knows no bounds.


Is Jan Drew the subject of this thread?

Poor cyberstalker, *hypocrite* Richard H Jacobson, still attacking me


R...@. Aug 29, 2:06 pm


Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 5 days (Sep 5, 2:06 pm).


On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 19:03:18 GMT, "LadyLollipop"



wrote:
Actually, it is Martk Thorson who is guilty on ALL COUNTS!!!!!!!


Is Mark Thorson the subject of this thread?

snip


Aloha,


Rich


PS: Cue Jan Drew to start a new thread attacking me.


------------------------------*-------------------
------------------------------*-------------------


Best defense to logic is ignorance

LadyLollipop wrote:
"Mark Probert" wrote in message
...

Absolutely nothing that NetStalker supporter Jan Drew quoted.


LadyLollipop wrote:

"Mark Probert" wrote in message
...


Rich.@. wrote:


On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 21:26:46 GMT, "LadyLollipop"
wrote:




Poor, pathetic Mark Probert.


Jan Drew aka Lady Lollipop says it is ALWAYS wrong to belittle. Jan
Drew's hypocrisy knows no bounds.


Is Jan Drew the subject of this thread?


Poor cyberstalker, *hypocrite* Richard H Jacobson, still attacking me


R...@. Aug 29, 2:06 pm


Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 5 days (Sep 5, 2:06 pm).


On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 19:03:18 GMT, "LadyLollipop"



wrote:

Actually, it is Martk Thorson who is guilty on ALL COUNTS!!!!!!!



Is Mark Thorson the subject of this thread?

snip


Aloha,



Rich



PS: Cue Jan Drew to start a new thread attacking me.



------------------------------*-------------------
------------------------------*-------------------



Best defense to logic is ignorance

"Mark Probert" wrote in message
...
LadyLollipop wrote:
"Mark Probert" wrote in message
...

Absolutely nothing that NetStalker supporter Jan Drew quoted.

*;*



LadyLollipop wrote:

"Mark Probert" wrote in message
...


Rich.@. wrote:


On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 21:26:46 GMT, "LadyLollipop"
wrote:




Poor, pathetic Mark Probert.


Jan Drew aka Lady Lollipop says it is ALWAYS wrong to belittle. Jan
Drew's hypocrisy knows no bounds.


Is Jan Drew the subject of this thread?


Poor cyberstalker, *hypocrite* Richard H Jacobson, still attacking me


R...@. Aug 29, 2:06 pm


Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 5 days (Sep 5, 2:06 pm).


On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 19:03:18 GMT, "LadyLollipop"



wrote:

Actually, it is Martk Thorson who is guilty on ALL COUNTS!!!!!!!



Is Mark Thorson the subject of this thread?

snip


Aloha,



Rich



PS: Cue Jan Drew to start a new thread attacking me.



------------------------------*-------------------
------------------------------*-------------------



Best defense to logic is ignorance