A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » alt.support » Child Support
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

This child was not wanted



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 21st 03, 03:54 AM
Brettg
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default This child was not wanted

I found this article on the net today.
__________________________________________________ _

How do you tell your child that you wish that he had never been born and that he
is just a financial burden to you? How do you make sure that he will be regularly
reminded of this fact throughout his life? One way is to sue a doctor for
performing an operation with a known failure rate because he didn't do a perfect
job.

The newspapers and electronic media around my place this week have been full of a
story about a woman being awarded a very large sum of money because she had a baby
some years after having a sterilisation operation. She informed the surgeon at the
time that her right ovary and fallopian tube had been removed in a previous
appendectomy operation, so all he had to do was tie off the left tube. The doctor
rather incautiously did not check on this while he had her cut open, possibly
through a fear of being sued for doing exploratory surgery even a short distance
away from the specific place for which he had received authority from the patient
(a fear which it now seems would have been well justified). When she fell
pregnanta few years later she could have had an abortion (any religious objection
to abortion would surely also imply objection to tubal ligation as a means of
contraception) but instead she chose to proceed with the pregnancy. Then she heard
about lawyers. She is making the usual noises about how she loves her son very
much (but not enough to pay for him like the rest of us have to do for our
children, planned or not) and how she didn't do it for the money but just to send
a message to doctors (so why did she do it at all or why doesn't she give the
money to charity?). One result of this incident is that doctors are already
talking about refusing to perform elective surgery where there is a risk of
failure, because the insurance protection against fatuous claims like this is too
expensive.

There was a very nice photograph in the paper showing the mother and her son
smiling broadly. She is smiling because she has just won the lottery. He is
smiling because he doesn't understand what is going on.


The Millenium Project
http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/



  #2  
Old July 21st 03, 05:58 AM
dani
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default This child was not wanted

Brettg wrote:
I found this article on the net today.
__________________________________________________ _

How do you tell your child that you wish that he had never been born and that he
is just a financial burden to you? How do you make sure that he will be regularly
reminded of this fact throughout his life? One way is to sue a doctor for
performing an operation with a known failure rate because he didn't do a perfect
job.

The newspapers and electronic media around my place this week have been full of a
story about a woman being awarded a very large sum of money because she had a baby
some years after having a sterilisation operation. She informed the surgeon at the
time that her right ovary and fallopian tube had been removed in a previous
appendectomy operation, so all he had to do was tie off the left tube. The doctor
rather incautiously did not check on this while he had her cut open, possibly
through a fear of being sued for doing exploratory surgery even a short distance
away from the specific place for which he had received authority from the patient
(a fear which it now seems would have been well justified). When she fell
pregnanta few years later she could have had an abortion (any religious objection
to abortion would surely also imply objection to tubal ligation as a means of
contraception) but instead she chose to proceed with the pregnancy. Then she heard
about lawyers. She is making the usual noises about how she loves her son very
much (but not enough to pay for him like the rest of us have to do for our
children, planned or not) and how she didn't do it for the money but just to send
a message to doctors (so why did she do it at all or why doesn't she give the
money to charity?). One result of this incident is that doctors are already
talking about refusing to perform elective surgery where there is a risk of
failure, because the insurance protection against fatuous claims like this is too
expensive.

There was a very nice photograph in the paper showing the mother and her son
smiling broadly. She is smiling because she has just won the lottery. He is
smiling because he doesn't understand what is going on.


The Millenium Project
http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/

The usual legal bull****. Take any topic in the news anymore, everyone
is trying to avoid responsibility.

Not a lot different than the forced child support most NCP's face. They
are forced to be a "visiting" parent and than ordered by law to pay for
the priveledge.

Whatever happened to common sense. The one thing that ****es me off more
than anything else is stupidity. While igonarance is failure or
inability to learn, stupidity is the willingness to do it wrong even
when you know better.

WTF

~Dani

  #3  
Old July 21st 03, 06:44 AM
glow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default This child was not wanted


"dani" wrote in message
rthlink.net...
Brettg wrote:
I found this article on the net today.
__________________________________________________ _

How do you tell your child that you wish that he had never been born and

that he
is just a financial burden to you? How do you make sure that he will be

regularly
reminded of this fact throughout his life? One way is to sue a doctor

for
performing an operation with a known failure rate because he didn't do a

perfect
job.

The newspapers and electronic media around my place this week have been

full of a
story about a woman being awarded a very large sum of money because she

had a baby
some years after having a sterilisation operation. She informed the

surgeon at the
time that her right ovary and fallopian tube had been removed in a

previous
appendectomy operation, so all he had to do was tie off the left tube.

The doctor
rather incautiously did not check on this while he had her cut open,

possibly
through a fear of being sued for doing exploratory surgery even a short

distance
away from the specific place for which he had received authority from

the patient
(a fear which it now seems would have been well justified). When she

fell
pregnanta few years later she could have had an abortion (any religious

objection
to abortion would surely also imply objection to tubal ligation as a

means of
contraception) but instead she chose to proceed with the pregnancy. Then

she heard
about lawyers. She is making the usual noises about how she loves her

son very
much (but not enough to pay for him like the rest of us have to do for

our
children, planned or not) and how she didn't do it for the money but

just to send
a message to doctors (so why did she do it at all or why doesn't she

give the
money to charity?). One result of this incident is that doctors are

already
talking about refusing to perform elective surgery where there is a risk

of
failure, because the insurance protection against fatuous claims like

this is too
expensive.

There was a very nice photograph in the paper showing the mother and her

son
smiling broadly. She is smiling because she has just won the lottery. He

is
smiling because he doesn't understand what is going on.


The Millenium Project
http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/

The usual legal bull****. Take any topic in the news anymore, everyone
is trying to avoid responsibility.

Not a lot different than the forced child support most NCP's face. They
are forced to be a "visiting" parent and than ordered by law to pay for
the priveledge.

Whatever happened to common sense. The one thing that ****es me off more
than anything else is stupidity. While igonarance is failure or
inability to learn, stupidity is the willingness to do it wrong even
when you know better.

WTF

I agree entirely dani.

Glow


  #4  
Old July 21st 03, 11:44 PM
Mage
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default This child was not wanted


The usual legal bull****. Take any topic in the news anymore, everyone
is trying to avoid responsibility.


It certainly seems that way....


Not a lot different than the forced child support most NCP's face. They
are forced to be a "visiting" parent and than ordered by law to pay for
the priveledge.

Whatever happened to common sense. The one thing that ****es me off more
than anything else is stupidity. While igonarance is failure or
inability to learn, stupidity is the willingness to do it wrong even
when you know better.

WTF


WTF!

~Dani



  #5  
Old July 22nd 03, 01:52 AM
Society
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default This child was not wanted

Well, where's the usual suspects who
can always be counted on to cluck
"If the doctor didn't want to pay child support,
he should have been wearing a condom?"

--
All excuses for feminism depend on
blaming the man and excusing the woman,
no matter what.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Babies gasping: Michigan sheriffs to do "child abuse raid" on hospitals? Todd Gastaldo Pregnancy 0 June 18th 04 06:09 PM
| | Kids should work... Kane General 13 December 10th 03 02:30 AM
Kids should work. LaVonne Carlson General 22 December 7th 03 04:27 AM
Kids should work. ChrisScaife Foster Parents 16 December 7th 03 04:27 AM
| Ex Giants player sentenced-DYFS wrkr no harm noticed Kane Foster Parents 10 September 16th 03 11:59 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.