If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#141
|
|||
|
|||
Robyn Kozierok wrote: Schedules being what they are, I often end up at the library with only my youngest, so I often pick up a pile of likely candidates and bring them home for my older kids. They usually read some and reject others, but I do end up implicitly "suggesting" books to read by the selections that I bring home. They seem to appreciate that. Oh, I still do this for my college-age reader, if I find a book I think is a good read. I stack books for the holidays, since term time is too busy for novels. I did this for both my kids for a while, but one's a reader and the other's not. So I save books for one and not for the other. Rupa |
#142
|
|||
|
|||
Sue wrote: I find it interesting that, if I had to guess, that most of you would not let children watch certain things on TV because of the content. But, from what I am reading here, content in a book is okay. Why is that? Is it because when you see something it's real to a child, but if he reads it and doesn't know what the meaning is, that they just gloss over it? There are a lot of books out there that my kids *could* read, but because of the content and where they are at tempermentally, I haven't let them read it. My friend didn't want her 2nd grader reading Sounder because the dog was killed. Her daughter's temperment was such that she would be really upset over that. But, she *could* read it. I don't know, I guess I am of the opinion to wait until they can understand the meaning of a book to read it and not just because they can. -- Sue (mom to three girls) It's interesting. As a child I had poor tolerance for sad books, (and sheepishly admit I still do). So I completely understand this kind of 'protection' and I did keep upsetting books from my kids when they were little. But by about 8 or 10 or so, I stopped. I think different people have different tolerances for sad stories. I recall someone I know told me she loved "The Little Mermaid" in its original Hans Anderson version (where she wins legs, but feels as though she's walking on knives) as a child, and cried buckets every time she read it. But it remained a favorite. I couldn't personally imagine doing that, but she clearly enjoyed it. Not knowing how it would work out for my kids, I let them sort it out themselves. Rupa |
#143
|
|||
|
|||
Kevin Karplus wrote:
Well, he's a fast reader and he spends almost all his waking time reading (when he isn't in school). We stopped in the library today to get 5 or 6 books and he bought also a couple of discarded kids' books (one was the first Bailey School Kids book, I forget what the other one was, but it was another short one). We stopped downtown for pizza and pasta and then walked home. He'd finished both books by the time we got home. The lightweight books he rarely re-reads, but the ones he likes (like the Harry Potter books) he reads many times. He's been that way since he started reading---in kindergarten he could not stop reading Magic Schoolbus books. When I was a kid I always wanted new books that I hadn't read before, but he seems equally happy with a new one or an old familiar. It's probably a good thing, since we probably couldn't keep him supplied with enough books if he only read them once. That was me as a child, only with me it was Oz books. I loved going to Woods Hole as a child because the library had a lot of them. One of my parent's friends says she always remembered me sitting in the backseat of the car with an Oz book and a box of Kleenex (because of hayfever). Now, I have the TV on almost all the time, but I don't look at it. I listen while I'm eating or computing or reading. And if I can, I always turn on the captions. grandma Rosalie |
#144
|
|||
|
|||
|
#145
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Barbara Bomberger wrote: Also for most of our lives the library was in reasonable walking distance as they got older. I think *that's* the difference. We live in a rural area, and the two nearest libraries with good children's and young adults' selections are about 20 miles away. We'll have one a lot closer next year, which I'm sure will change a lot of our patterns. I lived in the suburbs growing up, but I never had a library within walking distance except when I went to stay with my grandparents for a while one summer. --Robyn |
#146
|
|||
|
|||
|
#147
|
|||
|
|||
"Sue" wrote in message ... "Cathy Weeks" wrote in message So, how do you know when a child will understand the meaning of a book? I mean, censoring based on something that might be destructive is one thing, but censoring because they might not "get it" is quite another. And you never know when that "get it" moment is. I guess because I know my kids. Two of my children have comprehension problems. I can tell when one watches TV by the questions she is asking. Therefore I can gauge what she is able to comprehend and what she is not. Most books are above her. We have gone through the Scholastic books and she has read the synopsis about the books and most of them are definitely out of her range and very disturbing for her. For some reason, I think that I know when the "get it" moment will be by what kinds of things she picks out to read. None of my kids are into Harry Potter, LOTR, Narnia or any of those kinds of books. They are way above them. Maybe one day, but definitely not now. -- Sue (mom to three girls) Hmmm...maybe that's it. My daughter has been an average reader (I think, there's conflicting opinions about this) until this year and a rather reluctant one. She has excellent comprehension but in the past, she had trouble with her sight words and decoding words. So, maybe in our cases (with young readers) the parents tend to suggest books to read while with parents of older or more skilled readers back off because their children are more confident picking out books. Right now, DD still has difficulty finding books she wants to read. When we go to the library she's overwhelmed by the books on the shelves and she's unable to read and pick titles from a row of books. I don't censor or otherwise evaluate her picks; I offer her books I think she might like. Hence, I don't offer books far out of her range (thus, further alienating her from reading) unless it's a subject she really really likes. Unfortunately DD finds most books for young readers boring or "pathetic"; she hates most of the usual suspects (including Junie B Jones, Captain Underpants, Boxcar Children, Magic Treehouse, the list goes on). She wants to read books on the level of Harry Potter but they are way above her level right now. Our solution to this was to borrow or buy books on tape or CD. We have bought the Goblet of Fire on CD and she has listened to the book from end to end several times. We've listened to all the Harry Potter books, but we've listened to other books as well (The Westing Game, a mystery book that I had picked out to listen on my morning commute). I often suggest titles to my nephew (last Christmas, I think everyone gave him books) - most of them new-ish titles (e.g., Philip Pullman series, Cornelia Funke books, Bartimaeous Trilogy books by Jonathan Stroud) that I've read and enjoyed. It's part of sharing books. I never thought of it as censoring. Jeanne |
#148
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:45:25 EDT, "Bruce Bridgman and Jeanne Yang"
wrote: She wants to read books on the level of Harry Potter but they are way above her level right now. Our solution to this was to borrow or buy books on tape or CD. We have bought the Goblet of Fire on CD and she has listened to the book from end to end several times. We've listened to all the Harry Potter books, but we've listened to other books as well (The Westing Game, a mystery book that I had picked out to listen on my morning commute). I wonder if she might like the Choose your Own Adventure Books. http://www.answers.com/topic/choose-your-own-adventure http://www.gamebooks.org/show_series...+Own+Adventure A few seem to still be available at Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...48852?v=glance -- Dorothy There is no sound, no cry in all the world that can be heard unless someone listens .. The Outer Limits |
#149
|
|||
|
|||
Cathy Weeks wrote: dragonlady wrote: The level of violence in Ender's Game is pretty impressive -- both physical and psychological violence towards the children who are being trained. My mother couldn't stand it, and quit reading it. Plus, in the end, Ender commits genocide -- as far as he knows at that point, he kills an entire race. (It WAS done to save the human race -- these critters would have killed everyone if they'd had the chance.) So, if you are inclined to not allow your children to read certain books, it is probably one that you would not allow a younger child to read. Define "younger child?" We read it to my stepson when he was about 8.5 or 9, and he loved it, nor does it seem like he was scarred by it. My advice from the beginning was for the parent to pre-read the book, to judge for the individual child. There are two major scenes of violence, where Ender gets into fights that he couldn't avoid. You find out that he committed genocide AFTER the war was won - as far as he or anyone knew, he was playing on a simulator. There are no scenes of horrific bloodshed. The whole point of the discussion up to now is that the interpretation of what the book is about is dependent on the age of a child. The younger child would see the adventure, and the older would see the moral issues. Cathy Weeks I completely agree with you. I read Ender's game originally in the short-story form. It read like an adventure, where a clever 9 year-old saves the world. There was no sense of horror at the genocide because we never meet the enemy except in their role as predators of people. It's not even violent. It reads like a really rigorous sports-camp with a really driven coach, but the fate of the world rests on the final game. All the moral shadings come in later. Rupa |
#150
|
|||
|
|||
"toto" wrote in message ... On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:45:25 EDT, "Bruce Bridgman and Jeanne Yang" wrote: She wants to read books on the level of Harry Potter but they are way above her level right now. Our solution to this was to borrow or buy books on tape or CD. We have bought the Goblet of Fire on CD and she has listened to the book from end to end several times. We've listened to all the Harry Potter books, but we've listened to other books as well (The Westing Game, a mystery book that I had picked out to listen on my morning commute). I wonder if she might like the Choose your Own Adventure Books. A few seem to still be available at Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...48852?v=glance Thanks, I put a hold on the first book at our public library (there are no copies at our local branch), so we'll probably get it in a few days. If nothing else, I'm curious about these books so I'll read it myself if DD rejects it. Jeanne |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Review: Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter... and Spring (*** 1/2) | Steve Rhodes | General | 0 | April 9th 04 12:45 AM |
More School Issues (warning: VERY long!) | Circe | General | 26 | March 24th 04 12:36 PM |
Spring break vacation - update | lizzard woman | General | 8 | February 23rd 04 05:42 AM |
Need suggestions for spring break vacation please | lizzard woman | General | 45 | February 7th 04 06:28 PM |
Homework revisited | Cathy Kearns | General | 24 | September 24th 03 09:16 PM |