If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
Sleep and older children
Ericka Kammerer wrote: As I mentioned before, I looked up several studies, with the general consensus being that the average teen needs 9-10 hours of sleep per night, and the "natural" bedtime is around 11pm. Obviously, there's some individual variation, but that doesn't add up to a necessary 4am-1pm schedule. I don't know where the 4 am bedtime came from. 11 pm natural bedtime, sleep 10 hours means a 9 am wake time. The vast majority of teens need to get up several hours earlier than that to make it to school. This is what is causing the sleep problems. Therefore by weekend, the teen winds up with a sleep deficit, which is why teens are apt to sleep in past lunchtime when they can. So it would not be abnormal for a teen to go to bed at 11 pm on Friday, and sleep until 1 pm. I think *that's* what we've all been talking about, no? Not the late bedtime, so much as the sleeping-in-late and missing family morning time. But you know, even if it *did* suggest that 4am-1pm was optimal, teens would have to learn to survive on a different schedule until and unless the world sees fit to accommodate things like schools starting at 3pm and workdays moving to 3-11 instead of 9-5 ;-) Studies also suggest that sleeping in late on weekends to catch up can lead to poorer quality sleep and that schedules might have a significant impact on the delayed sleep schedule that teens seem to experience. It is not clear that this skew in their schedules is innate. Yes, the research I directed to you says that it is innate to have a later bedtime as a teen. Something about melatonin. The sleeping-in-late on weekends isn't because they go to bed even later than 11 pm; it's because they need to catch up on the sleep they missed all week long. Whether catch-up sleep leads to poorer quality sleep I don't know, but I wouldn't be surprised. What are you going to do though? If the teen can't naturally fall asleep until near 11 pm? And school starts early? All I know is that I wouldn't a) want to force my teen into an unnaturally early bedtime (tossing and turning while wide awake can definetly lead to insomnia); and b) have the heart to wake up a late-sleeping teen on the weekend, knowing he/she's already dragging around with a major deficit. It may well be caused by other factors in combination. For instance, they found that in those in middle or late puberty, even very dim lighting delayed melatonin secretion. So, that post-homework tv watching or computer gaming might well be a partial *cause* of the phase shift. A few of the articles specifcally ruled out t.v., gaming, and other modern-day diversions. There is something else going on with teens. Of course, having those diversions - and caffiene in sodas - can very defintely compound things. There are also some researchers looking into how teenaged alcohol exposure might be affecting the brain's sleep system. So, it might be a bit simplistic to say that we can't do anything about this. We may not be able to eliminate this phase shift, and it's very unlikely that we could eliminate the need for more sleep during the teen years, but it may be that with good sleep habits we can mitigate some of the sleep deprivation. Oh, I do agree to encourage the teen to have a regular bedtime. I guess I'm just disagreeing that it has to or should be as early as 9 pm, especially if it's natural for a teen to fall asleep closer to 11 pm. And I'm definetly disagreeing that one shouldn't allow their teen to catch up on sleep on the weekends. To me, it's cruelty to wake a kid up if a kid desparately needs the sleep. Sure, if they really are staying up until 4 am... but what I'm saying here is that it's quite natural for a teen who doesn't stay up past midnight to still sleep until lunch on the weekends. jen |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
Sleep and older children
Joy wrote: OTOH, a tattletale yappy little dog CAN make a difference ;-) LOL, don't encourage DH. :-) Come to think of it, that's the other safeguard we have: obnoxiously yappy dog lives right next door. During summer, he sleeps outside in the fenced in yard, in an area that is within yards of DD's bedroom window. And also we have motion-sensitive lights all around the property. The minute any kid slipped outside, the lights would all go on. Okay, now I don't have to feel so guilty about being such a heavy sleeper! Cuz it is true that since I did this very same thing myself at age 14, I am fully aware that at some point in time, one or both of my DD's will try it too! I recall when we first moved in, I expressed this concern to my neighbor, the one-who-hates-kids, and she told me to put bars on their windows. I refuse to go that far. Hate to say it, however, but that night I slipped out to meet my friends was a total blast. :-) jen |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
Sleep and older children
Joy wrote:
"Ericka Kammerer" wrote in message ... Joy wrote: "Banty" wrote in message And - no parent wants to hear this, but how many times do we hear of parents who are sooo sure what their teen is doing and how well they know their teen and what a great relationship they have with their teen, to learn in distressing or even tragic circumstances that they did not know what was going on with their teen at all. So I think it's advisable to have the schedules sync enough to still maintain some supervision. This brings up an [IMO] interesting question - at what age do (or did, as the case may be) people start loosening the reins, so to speak? What do you mean by "loosening the reins"? I think to some extent, it's ideally a process that begins early and continues gradually throughout their minority. It's a continuous give-and-take between increasing maturity, responsibilities, and privileges. I think you have to start giving small privileges early so that they can demonstrate responsibility, and then you just keep growing on that foundation, being ever vigilant for changes. Sure - and if the end result is supposed to be that they are capable of functioning as autonomous adults by approximately the time they graduate high school/turn 18 then from about the mid-teens on there needs to be an increasing degree of autonomy granted - in order for that to be effective there has to be meaningful opportunity for the teens to practice making their own decisions and managing their own schedules. I guess I'm seeing that as incompatible with "must make them go to bed on schedule, and must make them keep a schedule that maximizes family time". Mind you, I'm coming from the perspective of somebody who hasn't had a toddler in the house for a long, long time - my youngest is about to graduate high school. I dimly recall feeling differently when mine were little :-) I don't really see it as incompatible at all. The goal is to have kids who are healthy and alert and able to manage their responsibilities, which include spending some time with family. When they are mature enough and responsible enough, they get to manage their bedtimes themselves. If they do not manage to be healthy and alert or don't have time to spend with family because they're sleeping until noon, that is evidence to me that they are not yet mature and responsible enough to handle the privilege of managing their own bedtime. I don't really see how that's any different from any other privilege. They all come with commensurate responsibilities (or should), and those who don't live up to the responsibility side don't get the privilege. I mean, we can all bemoan the unfairness of it all that teens live in a world that isn't geared toward their natural schedule or their preferences, but that's life and mature folks have to learn to deal with the life they have, not the one they wish they had. Best wishes, Ericka |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
Sleep and older children
Ericka Kammerer wrote:
Rosalie B. wrote: Research suggests that by and large, you can't "catch up" on sleep. So, if the kid needs 10 hours a night and only manages to get 8 hours a night during the school week, he or she can't sleep 15 hours Friday and Saturday nights to make up for it. Realistically, they can sleep their 10 hours plus maybe a tad more. So, if they're going to bed by 11pm (no need to go to bed any later to accommodate their shifted schedule, and it would probably be quite reasonable for them to go to bed at 10pm), then they should still be out of bed by 10am at the latest, with 8 or 9am still being quite reasonable even in the case of catching up a sleep deficit. I wasn't suggesting exactly this scenario. I was thinking that they might sleep a LITTLE later on weekend. I don't know about the research, but I know that if I had to work a double shift, I couldn't make it up all at once, but I had to get that sleep sometime. Otherwise I was apt to go to sleep while I was trying to drive home. a teen needs to sleep until noon every day of summer break, regardless of how that might limit family time. Yes, teen's biological clocks tend to skew later, and I'm all for accommodating that to some degree, but not to the extent of saying that it's okay to lose family time for a summer because it's that important for the teen to stay up until 3 or 4am on a regular basis. I don't know why you have to exaggerate everything so much. Sleeping until noon EVERY DAY of summer and staying up until 4 am !!! That's not what most of us are talking about. I also tend to think that your premise that if you allow teens to sleep late they will miss a significant part of family time to be a false dichotomy because I suspect that the reason for the sleeping late is because the teen doesn't want family time rather than that they are inadvertently missing it. I don't think it's acceptable for teens to opt out of family life. Well you may not think it acceptable, but everyone isn't you. I don't think you can just make that flat statement and expect everyone to agree. I don't agree. I didn't say others had to agree. I said that I believe it to be unacceptable. And, since my kids are so unfortunate to have me as a parent, they're going to have to live with my unreasonable expectations that they will continue to be involved in a family life together even when they're teens and have Much Better Things To Do. Personally, I believe it's a choice. So that is your choice. Just don't present it as if it was the ONLY choice to make, or the only RIGHT choice or the only CORRECT choice. It's not a good idea to be so dogmatic until you've BTDT a couple of times. There was never a time when I was living at home and was not expected to take part in family activities. I have the same expectation for my kids. Sure, they will be more independent, but I also expect them to balance their lives in a way that includes some family time. I don't know exactly what you mean by family time. Doing chores together? Shopping? Going to church together? Eating dinner? This concept of "FAMILY TIME" is a foreign one to me and one that I would not have occurred to me to quantify, or to complain about the lack thereof. My mom told me a couple of months ago that she visited her grandfather EVERY Sunday after church, when she was home and she continued to do that after she graduated from college (although she wasn't married yet). She had that expectation for her children and grandchildren too, but since we lived farther from her, she would at least expect a weekly call. Her idea was that it was respectful to do that. My sister did that, and she also visited our mom and called me more than I visited and more than I called her (my sister). Is that the kind of thing you mean? When I was in college, I was expected to write home once a week at a minimum. My dd#1 made arrangements to call her children once a week and a preset time. We just do those things earlier in the day, when we don't have cranky, tired kids to deal with. It's not very relaxing or fun when they're sleep deprived. If kids are cranky at the end of the day it is more likely to be because they were NOT allowed to sleep in the morning, or because they missed their nap. Um, if my kids are up late, they're cranky the next day. Generally, they don't sleep in even when Well then why are you saying that you want to do things earlier in the day when they are not cranky and tired? ? We do things earlier in the day so that they are not cranky and tired. It works quite well. They get to bed at a reasonable hour, they wake refreshed and ready to go, and it's a great time for all of us. If I were to do things at 8pm, they'd be tired and cranky, and they'd wake tired and cranky the next day because they didn't get to bed on time. That works for you. All children are not the same in that respect. Some of my children could go to sleep late and not awake cranky and tired. Some of them needed their sleep but even those children could stay up and do something at 8 pm without severely impacting their attitude the next day. We used to have a Tuesday schedule (during the school year - the older girls were 3rd and 5th grade and we did this until they were in 5th and 7th grade), where I picked them up from school, and took them to their piano lesson. One would be playing the piano and the other would be doing her homework and then they switched. Then they had swim team from 4:30 to 6. We went to McDonalds and got hamburgers and then we went to the ice rink and skated from 7 to 9. The ice rink was about 45 minutes from home (we lived in the country). This schedule did not make them late for school the next day. When my kids were teens, they had family time because I was supporting them in their various activities. I was driving them to horse shows or swim meets or whatever activity they were involved in (even after they could drive, I still did most of the driving). I didn't say that they had to spend time with the family because I didn't have to. And the times that they went to bed were set by them because they knew when they had to get up to be ready for whatever it was that they were doing - they chose to do it, and they wanted to be prepared, so they did what they needed to do in order to get to the event in a timely manner and able to do well. That's great, but my personal opinion is that for my kids, it is not enough for them to live their lives according only to their own activities and their own needs. If the only thing they have on their plate for Saturday is a 4pm rehearsal, that doesn't mean they get to be AWOL until 4pm and disappear as soon as they're back. I'm not suggesting that they should be AWOL until 4 pm, but I don't think they are teenagers either. I was talking about my children when they were teens and in high school. I refuse to live with family who don't make some time for each other. Color me unreasonable if you like, but I believe it is completely possible to place a priority on family time and even have everyone enjoy it, even with teens. How long a time are you talking about? Whenever you say "Family Time" like that, it pushes my buttons because I'm not sure what you are talking about or what family time includes. It sounds to me like the things I had to do (let Aunt Ethel kiss and hug me) because my mom expected that I would do them. Why do you have to work so HARD to have family time? Isn't it a natural result of having a family that loves and respects each other? If not, I don't think it can be mandated, any more than love and respect can be mandated. grandma Rosalie |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
Sleep and older children
shinypenny wrote:
Ericka Kammerer wrote: I'm not sure where the contradiction is? We take family time where we can get it, especially since we do not control what time many of the activities happen. (We don't schedule anything but church on the weekends, but that's when the "extras" tend to happen, like sleepovers, performances, dress rehearsals, etc.) Well, you do have control. You can always say no to all the extra activities. (I say this, realizing just today I said yes to another round of swim team and tennis for the spring... ) ;-) Of course. What I meant is that while we do not sign up for Saturday morning swimming lessons, or any other Saturday activity, on a regular basis, the activities they do have require occasional weekend commitments which we do not control the scheduling for. So, yes, they could stop the activity all together, but we do not have an option to do the activity while still keeping all weekends free of commitments. If kids have activities in the evening, we'll have family time in the morning. If they have activities in the morning, we'll have family time in the evening. We work around whatever. The kids are somewhat more likely to have afternoon activities, which is convenient when they coincide with the toddler's nap so that we can go out and do stuff together in the morning. So, I don't see why morning can't be family time? If, after all, we end up with activities in the late afternoon/evening and toddler naps in the early afternoon, when else are we going to do it? I rather think that was my point. That's what I suspected your point was, but you weren't quite saying that. :-) You want your older kids to be on the same schedule as the toddler. The household currently revolves around his schedule. I get that. But, in a few years your toddler won't be napping so who knows??? Well, based on what I can see coming down the pike, not much will change. They will likely have activities to do and friends they wish to socialize with, and those things will most likely be primarily in the afternoon. Unless I greatly miss my guess, they won't suddenly need a lot less sleep, yet their school will start earlier. Thus, I rather suspect we won't be able to push bedtimes a lot later. Therefore, we will likely be in the same situation we are now: afternoons likely booked with non-family time and not a whole lot of time left after dinner. So, if we want to go out and do stuff as a family, mornings will probably still be the more likely time to do it. If your teens start sleeping in late, maybe you'll get flexible on the weekends and move family time later to accomodate *their* sleep needs. Right now, you're accomodating the toddler's. (And probably your own, because you likely have no luxury of sleeping in later since the young one gets up early... believe me, I totally commiserate with that one.). Regardless of anything else, DH will still have a life that generally involves getting up at a reasonable hour in the morning to go to work (and sleeping late on the weekends throws his schedule out of kilter) and I will still have demands on my time that require me to get moving in the morning, so neither of us are likely to have the luxury of sleeping until late for the forseeable future. And again, I don't have any objection to the kids sleeping in a bit on the weekend, but we'll continue to have to get going for church on Sunday mornings, and I firmly believe that sleeping until noon on Saturday when you have to get up much earlier the rest of the week just makes things worse, not better. So, they're welcome to sleep in a bit, but I seriously doubt we'll find it workable to have weekend mornings as a time for sleeping. Personally, I think there's value in some supervision past the stage where you're just worried about their physical safety. I know my DD13 would not like me intruding into her bathroom or bedroom when she's doing the kissy-face stuff in the mirror. :-) Well, you did note yourself that supervision doesn't always mean riding in someone's back pocket ;-) Then why did you bother to say something about supervision? Like you were implying I was not supervising her appropriately. I have no idea about you and your daughter. For me and my kids, having them awake for several hours after I went to bed (as in the hypothetical 4am-1pm sleep schedule) would not be adequate supervision, and I rather suspect that will be true when they're 13 as well. Could be wrong, but I just don't imagine that I'll feel comfortable with them up that many hours with the rest of the house out cold. The big one that leaps to mind is sneaking out, Can't open a window in our house without someone hearing it. but just because there's a rule against no phone or Internet after 8pm doesn't mean it won't happen unless you've taken other steps to preclude it from happening when you're not awake. Computer is in the dining room. The dining room is within feet of our bedroom door. We would/do hear her if she was in the dining room. She could take her cell to her room, but as I said, voices carry in our house, and I would hear her talking on the phone. Or if I was sound asleep, DH would because he's a light sleeper. She does have one friend who's a total insomniac who attempted once calling her after midnight. DD brought her ringing cell phone to me, rolling her eyes, and asked me to answer it for her and play "bad cop." I did, and reminded the young lady that we do not receive calls from friends after 9 pm. Of course, when DD gets a few years older, and gets a boyfriend, I can see myself easing up on this rule too. Maybe in high school the new rule will be no calls after 10 or 11 pm. At any rate, this is just getting silly. At some point, you do have to loosen up and relax and extend some trust to your kids. That's the whole point - you extend more and more trust, the older they get. The amount of trust I give DD13 is appropriate to her current maturity level and she has proven worthy of it to date. Which is fine for you and your daughter. I have no argument with extending privileges as maturity and responsibility dictate. You just asked what else could be going on "after hours" and I gave some examples. They may not be relevant for you and your family, but they surely are for a number of families out there going by the number of acquaintances who have been dealing with late night surfing and calling and roving. And you do realize that just because your 8 and 10 y.o. are getting tucked into bed at 9 pm, doesn't preclude them from waking up at 4 am and going out their bedroom windows either, right? Yep. That's why the 11yo is still sharing a room with the 8yo. He can have the downstairs bedroom in a year or two, but not before we get the window alarmed, because that's two floors away and I wouldn't be able to hear someone sneaking out (or in). That's also why the toddler's door has a toddler lock on it so she can't get out and the doors out of the house are toddler-proofed. I don't particularly want to find her on the street at 2am, which, given her personality, is a real possibility. I mean, seriously, you have no guarantee that they're going to sleep through the night, or not sleep walk or whatever. Unless you plan to be awake 24/7, just in case! Never said one should, only that one needs to be aware of the possibilities and plan for them based on the personality/responsibility/maturity of the individual child and the rest of the situation. Given your daughter's personality and your environment, it may be completely reasonable for her to be up until dawn while you snooze. For others, it may be unreasonable to have teens up so late after they're in bed. Best wishes, Ericka |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
Sleep and older children
shinypenny wrote:
Ericka Kammerer wrote: As I mentioned before, I looked up several studies, with the general consensus being that the average teen needs 9-10 hours of sleep per night, and the "natural" bedtime is around 11pm. Obviously, there's some individual variation, but that doesn't add up to a necessary 4am-1pm schedule. I don't know where the 4 am bedtime came from. 11 pm natural bedtime, sleep 10 hours means a 9 am wake time. The vast majority of teens need to get up several hours earlier than that to make it to school. This is what is causing the sleep problems. Therefore by weekend, the teen winds up with a sleep deficit, which is why teens are apt to sleep in past lunchtime when they can. So it would not be abnormal for a teen to go to bed at 11 pm on Friday, and sleep until 1 pm. I think *that's* what we've all been talking about, no? Not the late bedtime, so much as the sleeping-in-late and missing family morning time. I think there have been several things being discussed. One has been whether it's okay in the summer to let kids drift to whatever schedule because, hey, they don't have to be in school and it only takes a couple days to readjust once school starts. My opinion on that is that it's not okay because the rest of the family doesn't typically get to change their whole schedule in the summer to accommodate that, and for some it takes a lot more than a couple days to readjust. In terms of the sleep in late on the weekend to catch up, as I've said elsewhere, I don't have a problem with a little lie in. I don't think you have to get up at 6am on Saturday just because that's what you do M-F. However, if you're sleeping until noon on Saturday, I would suggest that that is doing more harm than good in the overall picture. Research does not suggest that you can catch up that way. You can get that full 10 hours (or whatever you need) on the weekends, and you can sometimes catch a little more than that, but you can't really make up the sleep deficit by sleeping away the "missing" hours from earlier in the week. Plus, getting up late on Saturday means that you're actively resetting your clock much later, making it that much more difficult to fall asleep at a reasonable hour that night and that much more difficult to get up when Monday rolls around again. Part of managing your sleep schedule so that it doesn't get out of hand and create more of a sleep deficit means avoiding those wild swings in schedule where possible. But you know, even if it *did* suggest that 4am-1pm was optimal, teens would have to learn to survive on a different schedule until and unless the world sees fit to accommodate things like schools starting at 3pm and workdays moving to 3-11 instead of 9-5 ;-) Studies also suggest that sleeping in late on weekends to catch up can lead to poorer quality sleep and that schedules might have a significant impact on the delayed sleep schedule that teens seem to experience. It is not clear that this skew in their schedules is innate. Yes, the research I directed to you says that it is innate to have a later bedtime as a teen. Something about melatonin. Yes, some of it is innate, but the question is whether we are adding additional factors that exacerbate the problem. The sleeping-in-late on weekends isn't because they go to bed even later than 11 pm; Well, for many that *is* a factor. They want to stay up late, and they're allowed to stay up late because it's the weekend and they don't have to get up early for school the next day. Plus, Friday and Saturday nights are prime time for going out with friends. So, often it *is* the case that these teens are up significantly later on a Friday or Saturday night, which exacerbates the problem because they will sleep in very late the next day and not be exposed to sunlight to reset their clock until after noon. That makes they want to stay up even later on Sunday night, and makes it harder to get up Monday morning. So, instead of starting out the week having caught up a bit, they start out with an even worse sleep deficit. it's because they need to catch up on the sleep they missed all week long. Whether catch-up sleep leads to poorer quality sleep I don't know, but I wouldn't be surprised. But again, you can't really catch up for the most part. You can recoup a little of it, but you don't ever really make up for missed sleep. What are you going to do though? If the teen can't naturally fall asleep until near 11 pm? And school starts early? Well, there's that question I raised above: is the 11pm the biological imperative, or are there other things we do that exacerbate that? If we reduced the exposure to tv and computer in the evening, would that help keep the biological clock from slipping so late into the night? Can physical exercise timed appropriately help establish a better sleep schedule? We know that more routine sleep and wake times help to reinforce a schedule, teen or not. I rather suspect that this is not a completely lost cause. I doubt you can get your teen asleep at 8:30, but I'll bet with good habits you can get a lot closer to 10pm. At that rate, you're at least cutting into the sleep deficit significantly. Even better if you could successfully move bedtime back to 9:30. All I know is that I wouldn't a) want to force my teen into an unnaturally early bedtime (tossing and turning while wide awake can definetly lead to insomnia); Sure, but that doesn't mean that you can't work the issue and attempt to establish a *successful* earlier bedtime. and b) have the heart to wake up a late-sleeping teen on the weekend, knowing he/she's already dragging around with a major deficit. Even if, on balance, waking him or her at 10am is better and leads to less of a sleep deficit than allowing him or her to sleep until noon? It may well be caused by other factors in combination. For instance, they found that in those in middle or late puberty, even very dim lighting delayed melatonin secretion. So, that post-homework tv watching or computer gaming might well be a partial *cause* of the phase shift. A few of the articles specifcally ruled out t.v., gaming, and other modern-day diversions. There is something else going on with teens. Of course, having those diversions - and caffiene in sodas - can very defintely compound things. Right. I'm not denying that there is an issue. I'm saying that the overwhelming majority of teens engage in several habits that are likely to exacerbate the problem. I'm not throwing in the towel without trying to make some headway on those issues. I have little control over when my teens will have to wake up to get to school. The only thing I can do to help them overcome the potential sleep deficit is try to make it possible for them to get to bed early enough in the evening. Even allowing them to sleep in on the weekends doesn't *fix* the sleep deficit. It just allows a momentary respite from it. They're still going to school sleep deprived, and that's far from ideal. We *have* to try to fix the actual problem. There are also some researchers looking into how teenaged alcohol exposure might be affecting the brain's sleep system. So, it might be a bit simplistic to say that we can't do anything about this. We may not be able to eliminate this phase shift, and it's very unlikely that we could eliminate the need for more sleep during the teen years, but it may be that with good sleep habits we can mitigate some of the sleep deprivation. Oh, I do agree to encourage the teen to have a regular bedtime. I guess I'm just disagreeing that it has to or should be as early as 9 pm, especially if it's natural for a teen to fall asleep closer to 11 pm. And I'm definetly disagreeing that one shouldn't allow their teen to catch up on sleep on the weekends. To me, it's cruelty to wake a kid up if a kid desparately needs the sleep. Sure, if they really are staying up until 4 am... but what I'm saying here is that it's quite natural for a teen who doesn't stay up past midnight to still sleep until lunch on the weekends. Personally, I would work the other end a lot harder before giving up on it entirely, and I am not so convinced that getting, say, 15 hours of sleep on the weekends is, on balance, the best cure. Best wishes, Ericka |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
Sleep and older children
In article ,
"Joy" wrote: And - no parent wants to hear this, but how many times do we hear of parents who are sooo sure what their teen is doing and how well they know their teen and what a great relationship they have with their teen, to learn in distressing or even tragic circumstances that they did not know what was going on with their teen at all. So I think it's advisable to have the schedules sync enough to still maintain some supervision. This brings up an [IMO] interesting question - at what age do (or did, as the case may be) people start loosening the reins, so to speak? There IS no set age: it depends on the family and the kid. Even with my twins, the amount of freedom they were given varied based on their maturity and trust levels. Actually, you start loosening the reins in a VERY real way the moment the umbillical cord is cut. All the rest of parenting is more and more loosening, until they day you cut the final string and they fly off on their own. When my kids were newborns, I couldn't stand to have them in a different room from me. By the time they were two months old, they took naps in one room while I was in a different room -- that's a loosening of reins. When they were two, I insisted on holding hands whenever we were near a street. By the time they were 16, I didn't do that anymore. (Much earlier, but you get my point.) Its constantly about how much to let go, how much to hold on, where the appropriate limits are, and the appropriate limits are a constantly moving target. Parenting: the only job where your goal is to work yourself OUT of work. (Yes, I know you never stop being a parent, but eventually you stop being a manager and move on to consultant -- and, someday, just colleague.) -- Children won't care how much you know until they know how much you care |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
Sleep and older children
Ericka Kammerer wrote: Of course. What I meant is that while we do not sign up for Saturday morning swimming lessons, or any other Saturday activity, on a regular basis, the activities they do have require occasional weekend commitments which we do not control the scheduling for. So, yes, they could stop the activity all together, but we do not have an option to do the activity while still keeping all weekends free of commitments. Yes, that's what I mean, you could stop the activity all together. It is a choice. 'Course, as I said, I just signed us up for swim team again which will require Saturday swim meet commitments. But I'm now rethinking the tennis because it'll likely conflict with swim meets. Hmmm... Well, based on what I can see coming down the pike, not much will change. They will likely have activities to do and friends they wish to socialize with, and those things will most likely be primarily in the afternoon. Unless I greatly miss my guess, they won't suddenly need a lot less sleep, yet their school will start earlier. Thus, I rather suspect we won't be able to push bedtimes a lot later. I think the point you are still missing is that even if you keep the bedtime as it is now, once they hit the teen years, they will very likely not be able to fall asleep before 11 pm. Even *if* they are getting up earlier, and even if they need more sleep. So you'll have two teens tossing and turning in bed, trying to get to sleep, unsuccessfully, for a couple of hours. And I can tell you that really is a set-up for insomnia. Therefore, we will likely be in the same situation we are now: afternoons likely booked with non-family time and not a whole lot of time left after dinner. So, if we want to go out and do stuff as a family, mornings will probably still be the more likely time to do it. Regardless of anything else, DH will still have a life that generally involves getting up at a reasonable hour in the morning to go to work (and sleeping late on the weekends throws his schedule out of kilter) and I will still have demands on my time that require me to get moving in the morning, so neither of us are likely to have the luxury of sleeping until late for the forseeable future. And again, I don't have any objection to the kids sleeping in a bit on the weekend, but we'll continue to have to get going for church on Sunday mornings, and I firmly believe that sleeping until noon on Saturday when you have to get up much earlier the rest of the week just makes things worse, not better. So, they're welcome to sleep in a bit, but I seriously doubt we'll find it workable to have weekend mornings as a time for sleeping. Talk to me in 3 or 4 years. :-) I have no idea about you and your daughter. For me and my kids, having them awake for several hours after I went to bed (as in the hypothetical 4am-1pm sleep schedule) would not be adequate supervision, and I rather suspect that will be true when they're 13 as well. Could be wrong, but I just don't imagine that I'll feel comfortable with them up that many hours with the rest of the house out cold. Yep, as I said, I have had to learn to get comfortable with it this year as our reality is shifting with a teen in the house. I would not be comfortable with DD11 being awake late at night - by herself or with her sister. She's a different age, and has different supervision requirements. Which is fine for you and your daughter. I have no argument with extending privileges as maturity and responsibility dictate. You just asked what else could be going on "after hours" and I gave some examples. They may not be relevant for you and your family, but they surely are for a number of families out there going by the number of acquaintances who have been dealing with late night surfing and calling and roving. In which case, yes, a parent needs to restrict such privileges. Not an issue here because so far she has proven trustworthy following the house rules. Yep. That's why the 11yo is still sharing a room with the 8yo. He can have the downstairs bedroom in a year or two, but not before we get the window alarmed, because that's two floors away and I wouldn't be able to hear someone sneaking out (or in). That's also why the toddler's door has a toddler lock on it so she can't get out and the doors out of the house are toddler-proofed. I don't particularly want to find her on the street at 2am, which, given her personality, is a real possibility. EEK! A few weeks ago, the girls' 18 month old sister woke up in the middle of the night, climbed out of her crib, went downstairs, grabbed DD's cell phone, punched a bunch of numbers, and called me on my cell which is preprogrammed in. Worrisome, but also very cute. :-) Never said one should, only that one needs to be aware of the possibilities and plan for them based on the personality/responsibility/maturity of the individual child and the rest of the situation. Given your daughter's personality and your environment, it may be completely reasonable for her to be up until dawn while you snooze. For others, it may be unreasonable to have teens up so late after they're in bed. Nah, up until dawn is pushing it. Except on occasion for slumber parties or to see the meteor showers. But we don't allow slumber parties on nights when we need to get up early the next day. jen |
#89
|
|||
|
|||
Sleep and older children
Ericka Kammerer wrote: In terms of the sleep in late on the weekend to catch up, as I've said elsewhere, I don't have a problem with a little lie in. I've never heard it called a "lie in" but it's cute so maybe I'll adopt that expression! I don't think you have to get up at 6am on Saturday just because that's what you do M-F. However, if you're sleeping until noon on Saturday, I would suggest that that is doing more harm than good in the overall picture. Research does not suggest that you can catch up that way. You can get that full 10 hours (or whatever you need) on the weekends, and you can sometimes catch a little more than that, but you can't really make up the sleep deficit by sleeping away the "missing" hours from earlier in the week. Plus, getting up late on Saturday means that you're actively resetting your clock much later, making it that much more difficult to fall asleep at a reasonable hour that night and that much more difficult to get up when Monday rolls around again. Part of managing your sleep schedule so that it doesn't get out of hand and create more of a sleep deficit means avoiding those wild swings in schedule where possible. Heh, talk to my DH. He's been passed out sleeping the ENTIRE DAY. Sigh... okay, he has an excuse, he woke up with 103 temperature that's been raging on and off all day long. I made him some homemade chicken soup but he hasn't stayed awake long enough to eat any of it. :-( Since around the time of my first pregnancy, I've suffered on and off with really bad insomnia issues. I've been nearly insomnia free now for the past 4 years. A big part of the solution for me was becoming a telecommuter, which enables me to work with my natural rythyms instead of against them. I no longer set my alarm but instead I wake up when and only when I'm done sleeping and naturally wake up, which happens to be 7 am, and luckily when my kids need to get up for school too. Over the past four years, my natural rhythm seems to be to fall asleep somewhere around 11 pm, and wake up around 7 AM. I find I simply cannot fall asleep any earlier than 11 pm. In the past in all those years when I've had to leave for the office, I would try to go to sleep earlier - knowing I was suffering from a major sleep deficit - and sure enough, this lead to insomnia. Too much time in bed not sleeping is a *major* cause of insomnia. That's why they tell you to get up and do something outside of bed until you're drowsy. Otherwise, you start to associate your bed with being awake, not asleep. And even now, I have a *really* terrible, awful time waking up earlier than 7 am. For example if I have an early flight and must set my alarm an hour or even a half hour early.. it just destroys me for a couple of days. I also have a really hard time handling bicoastal business trips - the time zone change is a killer. On weekends I might stay up until midnight but I'm always naturally awake - no alarm needed - no later than 8 am. Sometimes I *wish* I could sleep in late... but I can't anymore! So I do agree with you that everyone has a natural schedule and sticking more or less to it during weekends and summers is a good idea. However, I just disagree that every member of the family can be trained to have the same exact schedule! Especially teens, who are natural night owls. I think we all have a natural schedule (which yes varies during teen years). The real trouble is when work and school and whatever forces us to sleep during hours that are contrary to our natural schedule. Yes, some of it is innate, but the question is whether we are adding additional factors that exacerbate the problem. Sure, control for the additional factors, but also recognize that there is a big innate factor that you can't control, and it's naive to minimize it. Well, for many that *is* a factor. They want to stay up late, and they're allowed to stay up late because it's the weekend and they don't have to get up early for school the next day. Plus, Friday and Saturday nights are prime time for going out with friends. So, often it *is* the case that these teens are up significantly later on a Friday or Saturday night, which exacerbates the problem because they will sleep in very late the next day and not be exposed to sunlight to reset their clock until after noon. Heh - my kids' windows have sheer coverings so they get full-on sunlight early in the AM; all our bedrooms face east. On the flip side however they cannot go to bed before the sun goes down - it's too light. That makes they want to stay up even later on Sunday night, and makes it harder to get up Monday morning. So, instead of starting out the week having caught up a bit, they start out with an even worse sleep deficit. it's because they need to catch up on the sleep they missed all week long. Whether catch-up sleep leads to poorer quality sleep I don't know, but I wouldn't be surprised. But again, you can't really catch up for the most part. You can recoup a little of it, but you don't ever really make up for missed sleep. Better to recoup if you can, then interrupt the weekend lie-in and create an even worse sleep deficit, no? Well, there's that question I raised above: is the 11pm the biological imperative, or are there other things we do that exacerbate that? Research says it IS a biological imperative. *And* as a society we also probably do some things that exacerbate it. Those things you can and should control as a parent. But you simply can't force a teen to fall asleep at 9 pm if the teen's natural, biological imperative is to not get sleepy until 11 pm. And by enforcing an in-bed-by-9pm rule with a teen, you are very, very likely going to bring on insomnia... exactly what you were trying to avoid! If we reduced the exposure to tv and computer in the evening, would that help keep the biological clock from slipping so late into the night? DD13 doesn't watch t.v. or use the computer after 8 pm. Heck, she doesn't watch t.v. at all during the week. Unlike her sister, the t.v. addict, she hates t.v. Yet, she still naturally can't fall asleep before 11 pm. Even with low lighting, a quiet house, soothing bath, etc, etc.... Can physical exercise timed appropriately help establish a better sleep schedule? We know that more routine sleep and wake times help to reinforce a schedule, teen or not. I rather suspect that this is not a completely lost cause. I doubt you can get your teen asleep at 8:30, but I'll bet with good habits you can get a lot closer to 10pm. DD13 has excellent habits (including getting a lot of strenuous physical activity early in the day, not drinking caffienated beverages, and having a healthy diet with little sugar, etc), and yet she cannot fall asleep much before 11 pm. She's just not sleepy enough before then. At that rate, you're at least cutting into the sleep deficit significantly. Even better if you could successfully move bedtime back to 9:30. All I know is that I wouldn't a) want to force my teen into an unnaturally early bedtime (tossing and turning while wide awake can definetly lead to insomnia); Sure, but that doesn't mean that you can't work the issue and attempt to establish a *successful* earlier bedtime. Not if it's completely contrary to their biologically imperative rythym. and b) have the heart to wake up a late-sleeping teen on the weekend, knowing he/she's already dragging around with a major deficit. Even if, on balance, waking him or her at 10am is better and leads to less of a sleep deficit than allowing him or her to sleep until noon? Waking him or her at 10 instead of 12 ends up in a deficit increase of 2 hours, not a decrease. And, it does not guarantee the teen will be sleepier earlier that night, if that is what you were thinking. Right. I'm not denying that there is an issue. I'm saying that the overwhelming majority of teens engage in several habits that are likely to exacerbate the problem. I'm not throwing in the towel without trying to make some headway on those issues. I have little control over when my teens will have to wake up to get to school. The only thing I can do to help them overcome the potential sleep deficit is try to make it possible for them to get to bed early enough in the evening. Even allowing them to sleep in on the weekends doesn't *fix* the sleep deficit. It just allows a momentary respite from it. They're still going to school sleep deprived, and that's far from ideal. We *have* to try to fix the actual problem. I think mandatory naps for teens is a good idea. :-) Personally, I would work the other end a lot harder before giving up on it entirely, and I am not so convinced that getting, say, 15 hours of sleep on the weekends is, on balance, the best cure. Seriously, would you be opposed to your teen taking a long nap each afternoon? Or would that cut into family time? Naps are highly recommended. DH is a big napper - he takes cat naps every day, and it really helps him. Me, I've learned through trial and error I can't take even a cat nap or it wrecks my schedule. The thing is, it's all highly personal and individuals need to learn what works for them. Your kids need to figure this out on their own when they're older - you can't guess what is right for them. You can certainly advise and recommend and make suggestions they might try, but ultimately, it's up to them to figure out what works for them. It may turn out their natural schedules are identical to your own - and then this won't even be an issue for you down the road! jen |
#90
|
|||
|
|||
Sleep and older children
In article .com,
"shinypenny" wrote: And even now, I have a *really* terrible, awful time waking up earlier than 7 am. For example if I have an early flight and must set my alarm an hour or even a half hour early.. it just destroys me for a couple of days. I also have a really hard time handling bicoastal business trips - the time zone change is a killer. On weekends I might stay up until midnight but I'm always naturally awake - no alarm needed - no later than 8 am. Sometimes I *wish* I could sleep in late... but I can't anymore! Interestingly, when I need extra sleep, I still wake up at my "normal" time -- but can go back to sleep for a couple of hours. However, I'm more likely to catch up with naps -- my own natural rythym would have me sleeping every afternoon from about 1 to 2. And if I have to get up really early, I can get up, easily, at 4 am -- but if I try to get up at 5 or 6, I'm a basket case. It really DOES end up being a question of knowing your own rythyms, and cooperting with them to the extent possible. -- Children won't care how much you know until they know how much you care |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| | Kids should work... | Kane | General | 13 | December 10th 03 02:30 AM |
| | Kids should work... | Kane | Spanking | 12 | December 10th 03 02:30 AM |
Kids should work. | LaVonne Carlson | General | 22 | December 7th 03 04:27 AM |
Kids should work. | ChrisScaife | Foster Parents | 16 | December 7th 03 04:27 AM |
Helping Your Child Be Healthy and Fit sX3#;WA@'U | John Smith | Kids Health | 0 | July 20th 03 04:50 AM |