If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Kane EXPOSING his STUPIDITY to the public Check 'Alina's' IPaddress yourself.
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:- wrote:
Doan wrote: On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: Hihih! Alina is me is your claim, STUPID! Claim? No, it's my speculation that I share with others. Hahaha! So now it's no longer your claim? I see you can't answer the question about Alina's missing ISP though. What missing ISP? You are exposing your STUPIDITY again. Hihihi! The empty block of fields identifying a poster's IP provider from the magnitude survey service for e-mail, Doan. Then you are IGNORANTLY STUPID! Here is a hint: "ALL DATA IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND IRONPORT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF ACCURACY..." YOU ARE STUPID!!! Hihihi! Doan You know, where everyone else you insisted I run had their ISP listed, but Alina's IP number didn't produce anything but blanks....and YOU hid that section in each and every post about it. That one. When you run my IP number, any of them...dynamics...you get this: Other information about this IP address Sender Category Network Owner Gorge Networks Domain gorge.net Date of first message seen from this address 2007-01-28 CIDR range 209.216.160.0/19 # of domains controlled by this network owner 62 Geography data Country US State OR City Hood River Postal code 97031 When you run Alina's, no matter how many times you run it, for the same information block you get: Other information about this IP address Sender Category unknown Network Owner unknown Domain unknown Date of first message seen from this address CIDR range unknown # of domains controlled by this network owner 0 Geography data Country unknown State unknown City unknown Postal code unknown No, Doan, not the right hand block...everyone but a Spammer or very heavy e-mail server pulls a blank there. The left hand lower block that you keep hiding by NOT producing when you are looking directly at the page it's on. As I said, I see you can't answer the questions about Alina's posting e-mail without an ISP, Doan. But you sure can continue to lie to dodge....R R R RRRR R R R The kind of thing a sock would do. A sock with a good working knowledge of how to hide their real identity. Smile, you're on candid Usenet. Doan On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:-] wrote: I see you can't answer the questions about Alina's posting e-mail without an ISP, Doan. I doubt even the Internet duffer would let that slip by unquestioned. Trying to divert with ad hom? Usual tactics for you, liar. |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Kane EXPOSING his STUPIDITY to the public Check 'Alina's' IPaddress yourself.
Hihihi! Kane still EXPOSING his STUPIDITY. Doan On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:- wrote: 0:- wrote: Where's your explanation for why all of us show an ISP who supplied our real IP numbers, and NONE where Alina's IP number is run, which of course means a fictitious IP number was issued for that account by an anonymizing service. Who did you subscribe with, Doan? |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Kane EXPOSING his STUPIDITY to the public Check 'Alina's'IP address yourself.
Doan wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: Hihih! Alina is me is your claim, STUPID! Claim? No, it's my speculation that I share with others. Hahaha! So now it's no longer your claim? I see you can't answer the question about Alina's missing ISP though. What missing ISP? You are exposing your STUPIDITY again. Hihihi! The empty block of fields identifying a poster's IP provider from the magnitude survey service for e-mail, Doan. Then you are IGNORANTLY STUPID! I would be if I bought that dodge. I asked you to explain, if you could (you can always say, "I don't know"...but your ego is bound up in this pretty tightly....rrr r r r r ) why no one but Alina lacks data in the lower left block...the one that gives ALL of us, Me, Ron, Betty, and ISP who assigned our IP number. Still can't do anything but dodge, I see. Here is a hint: Hints aren't explanations, Doan. For you it's just another dodge. Like always. R R R R R R RR R RR "ALL DATA IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND IRONPORT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF ACCURACY..." That explains how IP run but Alina's produces an ISP provider of and IP number? Sure Doan. Somehow it was right on us but wrong on Alina...yeah, that's it. They are picking on Alina. R RRRRRR YOU ARE STUPID!!! Hihihi! Well, I most certainly would be if I bought that latest dodge. Hohoho! I asked you to explain. Can you, or will you try yet another dodge? Want to guess what my money is on? Look again below and answer the actual question, or admit you cannot. And no matter how many times her number is run, and others are run, the results are the same, even over a span of days. Explain please. 0:-] Doan You know, where everyone else you insisted I run had their ISP listed, but Alina's IP number didn't produce anything but blanks....and YOU hid that section in each and every post about it. That one. When you run my IP number, any of them...dynamics...you get this: Other information about this IP address Sender Category Network Owner Gorge Networks Domain gorge.net Date of first message seen from this address 2007-01-28 CIDR range 209.216.160.0/19 # of domains controlled by this network owner 62 Geography data Country US State OR City Hood River Postal code 97031 When you run Alina's, no matter how many times you run it, for the same information block you get: Other information about this IP address Sender Category unknown Network Owner unknown Domain unknown Date of first message seen from this address CIDR range unknown # of domains controlled by this network owner 0 Geography data Country unknown State unknown City unknown Postal code unknown No, Doan, not the right hand block...everyone but a Spammer or very heavy e-mail server pulls a blank there. The left hand lower block that you keep hiding by NOT producing when you are looking directly at the page it's on. As I said, I see you can't answer the questions about Alina's posting e-mail without an ISP, Doan. But you sure can continue to lie to dodge....R R R RRRR R R R The kind of thing a sock would do. A sock with a good working knowledge of how to hide their real identity. Smile, you're on candid Usenet. Doan On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:-] wrote: I see you can't answer the questions about Alina's posting e-mail without an ISP, Doan. I doubt even the Internet duffer would let that slip by unquestioned. Trying to divert with ad hom? Usual tactics for you, liar. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Kane EXPOSING his STUPIDITY to the public Check 'Alina's'IP address yourself.
Doan wrote:
Hihihi! Kane still EXPOSING his STUPIDITY. Just explain, please. And thanks. 0;-] Doan On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:- wrote: 0:- wrote: Where's your explanation for why all of us show an ISP who supplied our real IP numbers, and NONE where Alina's IP number is run, which of course means a fictitious IP number was issued for that account by an anonymizing service. Who did you subscribe with, Doan? |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Doan's desperation reply.....R R RRR R R R ... Kane EXPOSING
Doan wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: Hihih! Alina is me is your claim, STUPID! Claim? No, it's my speculation that I share with others. Hahaha! So now it's no longer your claim? I see you can't answer the question about Alina's missing ISP though. What missing ISP? You are exposing your STUPIDITY again. Hihihi! The empty block of fields identifying a poster's IP provider from the magnitude survey service for e-mail, Doan. Then you are IGNORANTLY STUPID! Here is a hint: "ALL DATA IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND IRONPORT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF ACCURACY..." YOU ARE STUPID!!! Hihihi! Doan You know, where everyone else you insisted I run had their ISP listed, but Alina's IP number didn't produce anything but blanks....and YOU hid that section in each and every post about it. That one. When you run my IP number, any of them...dynamics...you get this: Other information about this IP address Sender Category Network Owner Gorge Networks Domain gorge.net Date of first message seen from this address 2007-01-28 CIDR range 209.216.160.0/19 # of domains controlled by this network owner 62 Geography data Country US State OR City Hood River Postal code 97031 When you run Alina's, no matter how many times you run it, for the same information block you get: Other information about this IP address Sender Category unknown Network Owner unknown Domain unknown Date of first message seen from this address CIDR range unknown # of domains controlled by this network owner 0 Geography data Country unknown State unknown City unknown Postal code unknown No, Doan, not the right hand block...everyone but a Spammer or very heavy e-mail server pulls a blank there. The left hand lower block that you keep hiding by NOT producing when you are looking directly at the page it's on. As I said, I see you can't answer the questions about Alina's posting e-mail without an ISP, Doan. But you sure can continue to lie to dodge....R R R RRRR R R R The kind of thing a sock would do. A sock with a good working knowledge of how to hide their real identity. Smile, you're on candid Usenet. Doan On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:-] wrote: I see you can't answer the questions about Alina's posting e-mail without an ISP, Doan. I doubt even the Internet duffer would let that slip by unquestioned. Trying to divert with ad hom? Usual tactics for you, liar. |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Kane still EXPOSING his STUPIDITY! Doan's desperation reply.....R
Wanna me to show you how to do a lookup? Hihihi! Doan On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: Hihih! Alina is me is your claim, STUPID! Claim? No, it's my speculation that I share with others. Hahaha! So now it's no longer your claim? I see you can't answer the question about Alina's missing ISP though. What missing ISP? You are exposing your STUPIDITY again. Hihihi! The empty block of fields identifying a poster's IP provider from the magnitude survey service for e-mail, Doan. Then you are IGNORANTLY STUPID! Here is a hint: "ALL DATA IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND IRONPORT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF ACCURACY..." YOU ARE STUPID!!! Hihihi! Doan You know, where everyone else you insisted I run had their ISP listed, but Alina's IP number didn't produce anything but blanks....and YOU hid that section in each and every post about it. That one. When you run my IP number, any of them...dynamics...you get this: Other information about this IP address Sender Category Network Owner Gorge Networks Domain gorge.net Date of first message seen from this address 2007-01-28 CIDR range 209.216.160.0/19 # of domains controlled by this network owner 62 Geography data Country US State OR City Hood River Postal code 97031 When you run Alina's, no matter how many times you run it, for the same information block you get: Other information about this IP address Sender Category unknown Network Owner unknown Domain unknown Date of first message seen from this address CIDR range unknown # of domains controlled by this network owner 0 Geography data Country unknown State unknown City unknown Postal code unknown No, Doan, not the right hand block...everyone but a Spammer or very heavy e-mail server pulls a blank there. The left hand lower block that you keep hiding by NOT producing when you are looking directly at the page it's on. As I said, I see you can't answer the questions about Alina's posting e-mail without an ISP, Doan. But you sure can continue to lie to dodge....R R R RRRR R R R The kind of thing a sock would do. A sock with a good working knowledge of how to hide their real identity. Smile, you're on candid Usenet. Doan On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:-] wrote: I see you can't answer the questions about Alina's posting e-mail without an ISP, Doan. I doubt even the Internet duffer would let that slip by unquestioned. Trying to divert with ad hom? Usual tactics for you, liar. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Kane EXPOSING his STUPIDITY to the public Check 'Alina's' IPaddress yourself.
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: Hihihi! Kane still EXPOSING his STUPIDITY. Just explain, please. And thanks. 0;-] % Joint Whois - whois.lacnic.net % This server accepts single ASN, IPv4 or IPv6 queries % Copyright LACNIC lacnic.net % The data below is provided for information purposes % and to assist persons in obtaining information about or % related to AS and IP numbers registrations % By submitting a whois query, you agree to use this data % only for lawful purposes. % 2007-03-01 18:56:55 (BRT -03:00) inetnum: 148.233/16 status: reallocated owner: Uninet S.A. de C.V. ownerid: MX-USCV4-LACNIC responsible: Gestin de cambios y configuraciones address: Periferico Sur, 3190, address: 01900 - Ciudad de Mxico - DF country: MX phone: +52 55 56244400 [] owner-c: DCA tech-c: DCA inetrev: 148.233/16 nserver: DNS.UNINET.NET.MX nsstat: 20070227 AA nslastaa: 20070227 nserver: NSGDL1.UNINET.NET.MX nsstat: 20070227 AA nslastaa: 20070227 created: 19980620 changed: 20040203 inetnum-up: 148.224/12 nic-hdl: DCA person: GESTION DE CAMBIOS e-mail: address: PERIFERICO SUR, 3190, ALVARO OBREG address: 01900 - MEXICO DF - DF country: MX phone: +52 5 556244400 [] created: 20021210 changed: 20060704 % whois.lacnic.net accepts only direct match queries. % Types of queries a POCs, ownerid, CIDR blocks, IP % and AS numbers. Remember, unlike YOU, Kane, I don't call people STUPID or a LIAR without proof! Wanna know about email traffic monitoring, STUPID Kane? Doan On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:- wrote: 0:- wrote: Where's your explanation for why all of us show an ISP who supplied our real IP numbers, and NONE where Alina's IP number is run, which of course means a fictitious IP number was issued for that account by an anonymizing service. Who did you subscribe with, Doan? |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Kane EXPOSING his STUPIDITY to the public Check 'Alina's' IPaddress yourself.
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:- wrote:
Doan wrote: On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: Hihih! Alina is me is your claim, STUPID! Claim? No, it's my speculation that I share with others. Hahaha! So now it's no longer your claim? I see you can't answer the question about Alina's missing ISP though. What missing ISP? You are exposing your STUPIDITY again. Hihihi! The empty block of fields identifying a poster's IP provider from the magnitude survey service for e-mail, Doan. Then you are IGNORANTLY STUPID! I would be if I bought that dodge. I asked you to explain, if you could (you can always say, "I don't know"...but your ego is bound up in this pretty tightly....rrr r r r r ) why no one but Alina lacks data in the lower left block...the one that gives ALL of us, Me, Ron, Betty, and ISP who assigned our IP number. MEXICO! You, Ron, Betty... are in MEXICO? Doan |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Kane still EXPOSING his STUPIDITY! Doan's desperation reply.....R
Doan wrote:
Wanna me to show you how to do a lookup? Hihihi! I already know how. I can produce Alina's ISP by a Whois, but not by a traffic survey....that disappears her ISP information, but not mine, and Doan, not even yours. Hohoho! Doan On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: Hihih! Alina is me is your claim, STUPID! Claim? No, it's my speculation that I share with others. Hahaha! So now it's no longer your claim? I see you can't answer the question about Alina's missing ISP though. What missing ISP? You are exposing your STUPIDITY again. Hihihi! The empty block of fields identifying a poster's IP provider from the magnitude survey service for e-mail, Doan. Then you are IGNORANTLY STUPID! Here is a hint: "ALL DATA IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND IRONPORT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF ACCURACY..." YOU ARE STUPID!!! Hihihi! Doan You know, where everyone else you insisted I run had their ISP listed, but Alina's IP number didn't produce anything but blanks....and YOU hid that section in each and every post about it. That one. When you run my IP number, any of them...dynamics...you get this: Other information about this IP address Sender Category Network Owner Gorge Networks Domain gorge.net Date of first message seen from this address 2007-01-28 CIDR range 209.216.160.0/19 # of domains controlled by this network owner 62 Geography data Country US State OR City Hood River Postal code 97031 When you run Alina's, no matter how many times you run it, for the same information block you get: Other information about this IP address Sender Category unknown Network Owner unknown Domain unknown Date of first message seen from this address CIDR range unknown # of domains controlled by this network owner 0 Geography data Country unknown State unknown City unknown Postal code unknown No, Doan, not the right hand block...everyone but a Spammer or very heavy e-mail server pulls a blank there. The left hand lower block that you keep hiding by NOT producing when you are looking directly at the page it's on. As I said, I see you can't answer the questions about Alina's posting e-mail without an ISP, Doan. But you sure can continue to lie to dodge....R R R RRRR R R R The kind of thing a sock would do. A sock with a good working knowledge of how to hide their real identity. Smile, you're on candid Usenet. Doan On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:-] wrote: I see you can't answer the questions about Alina's posting e-mail without an ISP, Doan. I doubt even the Internet duffer would let that slip by unquestioned. Trying to divert with ad hom? Usual tactics for you, liar. |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Kane EXPOSING his STUPIDITY to the public Check 'Alina's'IP address yourself.
Doan wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: Hihih! Alina is me is your claim, STUPID! Claim? No, it's my speculation that I share with others. Hahaha! So now it's no longer your claim? I see you can't answer the question about Alina's missing ISP though. What missing ISP? You are exposing your STUPIDITY again. Hihihi! The empty block of fields identifying a poster's IP provider from the magnitude survey service for e-mail, Doan. Then you are IGNORANTLY STUPID! I would be if I bought that dodge. I asked you to explain, if you could (you can always say, "I don't know"...but your ego is bound up in this pretty tightly....rrr r r r r ) why no one but Alina lacks data in the lower left block...the one that gives ALL of us, Me, Ron, Betty, and ISP who assigned our IP number. MEXICO! You, Ron, Betty... are in MEXICO? Oh don't be so stupid. You aren't fooling anyone but yourself. There was NO information for Alina, and we ALL had OUR ISP listed in that same block. I posted it for myself. Want to see Betty's and Ron's? In fact, as I recall I did produce one of them from that source. Because they are not subscribing to an anonymizing service. And it sure as hell didn't say Mexico. And neither did Alina's. 'Her's' had all empty fields, and I posted that here for you, and provided the link. And that is the difference between a strict IP lookup, and a traffic analysis based lookup...the latter tends to SHOW when an IP is fictitious by NOT finding an ISP domain. You are just doing your usual boring and worn out lying by dodge again, Doan. Doan 0:] |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Kids should work... | Doan | Spanking | 33 | December 10th 03 08:05 PM |
| | Kids should work... | Kane | General | 13 | December 10th 03 02:30 AM |
| | Kids should work... | Kane | Spanking | 12 | December 10th 03 02:30 AM |
Kids should work. | LaVonne Carlson | General | 22 | December 7th 03 04:27 AM |
Kids should work. | ChrisScaife | Spanking | 16 | December 7th 03 04:27 AM |