If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Parents' experiences of screening for Down's: How do views change throughout pregnancy?
(I'm currently 6 wks pg!).
congratulations!!!!!!!!! I recall my sonographer writing with great distate that 'Jeni refused the triple test!' on my notes. our scans must have been around the same time if I'm remembering rightly, I also got a bizarre reaction when I said I wasn't going to have the triple test, they looked at me as if I had grown two heads. I don't recall anything being mentioned at the scan first time around, I wonder if they had changed the procedure recently, so that scanners were telling you to go and find out the date you should have it etc. hence they weren't used to the response and were only slowly learning that it's not something everyone had. When I then said nor was I having a 20 week scan I think they thought I had gone absolutly nuts, as it happened we'd moved (temporarily) by that time anyway, but I don't think we knew it was definite at that stage. Cheers Anne |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Parents' experiences of screening for Down's: How do views change throughout pregnancy?
On May 29, 9:39 am, "beyond the pale"
wrote: "Jamie Clark" wrote Just in general, what do doctors or ultrasound technicians do when they see something wrong or of concern- something that they *think* looks wrong? I mean obviously they check it out--but do they tell you right away or do they try to keep quiet about it? I have always wondered this. I'd hope they'd tell you. I just had my ultrassound today and I always ask "Does everything look ok?" which I assume most people can't help but ask. But what if I didn't ask, and they found something, would they tell me or would they tell the doctor and then would he have me come in or tell me at my next appointment, or what? Do not be so sure that you feel this way. Just last night I called someone to come in for a follow up appointment today because their child had a high white blood cell count. What was I concerned about? That the child might have leukemia. What is the well over 99% chance of what the child has? An infection that's being treated by the antibiotics that the doctor prescribed at the visit earlier in the day. What did I do? Call the pediatric oncologist to ask them to look at the blood smear today to be sure, and call the mom to say that the infection fighting cells were really high, which probably just means that her body is responding strongly to the infection, but we'd like to see her tomorrow just to be sure that she's getting better. It would serve absolutely no useful purpose to tell the mom that we're double checking for cancer. If her kid has it she'll find out soon enough and there's nothing she can do about it in the intervening 18 hours. Ultrasound technicians are often not allowed to give their read to the patient because they're not radiologists. I've seen all kinds of crazy hypotheses among various medical professionals about what might be going on with patients. The less training the person has the less grounded those hypotheses sometimes are in reality. As doctors our job is to always have the rare but dreaded possibility on our radar screens and to double check for it even if the odds are very, very small. You don't want to inflict truly awful news to someone if it's just a "maybe" (unless treatment needs to get started immediately). I used to feel the way you do before I started working in medicine. I now have enough experience to know that truly sometimes ignorance is bliss. My brother recently had a large benign tumor taken out of his neck, about at the level where Christopher Reeves was injured (ie, had surgery gone badly he could have ended up a ventilator dependent quadriplegic). When he mentioned at a pre-op visit to the neurosurgeon that his sister was a doctor, he kindly gave my brother his cell phone number and said I could call him if I wished. It took me quite some time to call because I did not want to know very many details about the tumor until after the surgery, and I definitely did not want to see the scans until after the surgery. Before I was in medicine I would have felt differently, but I've seen enough people progress from blissful ignorance to anxious waiting to utter devastation to know that I didn't want to go there unless I had to (and fortunately my brother's surgery went great). If something bad was found on a prenatal scan with either a high likelihood or a certainty you'd probably either be told about it right after the scan or the OB would make an appointment to go over it with you. If something was possible but needed further testing they'd tell you what testing and why and probably give you some odds. But some small random findings that rarely mean anything but occasionally do (choroid plexus cysts being the perfect example) and don't add up to a pattern usually aren't communicated. There's just no point in terrifying hundreds or thousands of people so that the one person who has it for real knows about it a little bit earlier. Kate, ignorant foot soldier of the medical cartel and the Bug, almost 4 years old |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Parents' experiences of screening for Down's: How do views change throughout pregnancy?
"beyond the pale" wrote in message
... "Jamie Clark" wrote The only option I can think of is to let the doctor know that you want to be told of any issues that look fatal or very very serious, but not for anything that is just marginal or anomolous but not incompatible with life. But if you watched the person conducting the u/s, I think you'd get a sense of the anomolies that they were finding, if they found some, because they'd spend a LOT of time going over and over certain areas, and spend much more time on those places than on others. And even then, if they said, "Okay, nothing fatal", you might still be rather worried that there was something wrong with your child, but not know what it was, but you know that something was wrong because they spent so long looking at the heart or spine or brain, or whatever. Just in general, what do doctors or ultrasound technicians do when they see something wrong or of concern- something that they *think* looks wrong? I mean obviously they check it out--but do they tell you right away or do they try to keep quiet about it? I have always wondered this. I'd hope they'd tell you. I just had my ultrassound today and I always ask "Does everything look ok?" which I assume most people can't help but ask. But what if I didn't ask, and they found something, would they tell me or would they tell the doctor and then would he have me come in or tell me at my next appointment, or what? I meant to ask, but we got busy. It's something that's always bothered me, I guess I have a fear of a doctor letting me think everything is ok, but the doctor suspects something is wrong. Why do I think a doctor would do this? Well, I don't think they would do it with a bad motive or anything, I think a doctor would want to check it out more thoroughly so they aren't causing you unnecessary worry. You would not want to make a pregnant woman distraught and then everything turns out ok. So I guess this is my question: are most doctors taught in med school to be very conservative in letting women know if their ultrasounds or tests might not look right, or are they taught it's best to let them know right away or what? What are they "supposed" to do? I'd want to know, it's why I ask. And if a doctor told me that something looks concerning but he is not sure if it's wrong, he wants to keep an eye on it, I would not flip out- I'd be glad to be aware of it, and worried, yes, but I wouldn't jump to conclusions or let myself worry to death over it. I'd be concerned too, but glad to be informed. This is one that I know. While you are on the u/s table, the sonographer would be very quiet (if they were chatty) and take lots and lots of measurements of one particular area. If this is your first child, you would have no idea that they were spending a lot of time looking at the heart or spine or whatever. You have nothing to compare it to. Instead of it being a 30 minute process, it becomes 45 minutes. Then the u/s would excuse themselves for a moment to go speak to the doctor. Again, if this is your first u/s, you have no idea that anything is wrong, and assume that like an x-ray, that the doctor needs to read it themselves to pronounce the baby "healthy" or that it's common procedure for the doctor to come in and do a quick part of the scan themselves. The doctor will come in and spend more time looking at the one part of the anatomy, and then finish up. Then they ask you to come into the doctors office and sit down. At this point they will explain what the saw, what it might mean, and what other testing is available to help get as much information as possible to pinpoint what is really going on. Additional testing may be amnio, or fetal echocardiogram, or another u/s at a specialty clinic, etc. They also may ask you to come back in 2-4 weeks, when the baby is bigger and the anatomy is easier to see. Sometimes the issue is lack of clarity, or can be grown out of. If they feel that the issues is very severe, such as missing brain or really bad spinal or heart issues, they will talk to you about terminating the pregnancy, and if you are interested, offer to book you into the hospital within a day or two. I don't think any doctor would withhold information about the health of your baby, as it's your right as the parent to make medical decisions for your child, even when they are in utero. Besides, most things that could be found may require some additional testing to see the severity, and many issues are linked to others, so they would want to see if they can find any additional problems, etc., so they can make as accurate a diagnosis as possible. -- Jamie Earth Angels: Taylor Marlys -- 01/03/03 Addison Grace -- 09/30/04 Check out the family! -- www.MyFamily.com, User ID: Clarkguest1, Password: Guest Become a member for free - go to Add Member to set up your own User ID and Password |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Parents' experiences of screening for Down's: How do views change throughout pregnancy?
"beyond the pale" wrote in message Just in general, what do doctors or ultrasound technicians do when they see something wrong or of concern- something that they *think* looks wrong? I had a Level II ultrasound for #2 when the blood test came back so wonky. They spent forever doing it, the tech wouldn't make a peep, the perientologist (I think I spelled that wrong) came in and basically did the whole thing over again and I was freaked out. Everything was fine - they were just being thorough. One of my other babies had a soft marker for downs (a cyst of some sort on the brain). It was really no big deal, the doctor wasn't worried about it, I wasn't worried about it, but she did tell me (the tech did not) and updated me with each subsequent ultrasound. I had a lot of ultrasounds because I was having twins. -- Nikki, mama to Hunter 4/99 Luke 4/01 Brock 4/06 Ben 4/06 |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Parents' experiences of screening for Down's: How do views change throughout pregnancy?
On May 29, 11:39 am, "beyond the pale"
wrote: "Jamie Clark" wrote The only option I can think of is to let the doctor know that you want to be told of any issues that look fatal or very very serious, but not for anything that is just marginal or anomolous but not incompatible with life. But if you watched the person conducting the u/s, I think you'd get a sense of the anomolies that they were finding, if they found some, because they'd spend a LOT of time going over and over certain areas, and spend much more time on those places than on others. And even then, if they said, "Okay, nothing fatal", you might still be rather worried that there was something wrong with your child, but not know what it was, but you know that something was wrong because they spent so long looking at the heart or spine or brain, or whatever. Just in general, what do doctors or ultrasound technicians do when they see something wrong or of concern- something that they *think* looks wrong? I mean obviously they check it out--but do they tell you right away or do they try to keep quiet about it? I have always wondered this. I'd hope they'd tell you. I just had my ultrassound today and I always ask "Does everything look ok?" which I assume most people can't help but ask. But what if I didn't ask, and they found something, would they tell me or would they tell the doctor and then would he have me come in or tell me at my next appointment, or what? It's my understanding that the U/S technician is not supposed to discuss the U/S with the parent, that it's the role of the health care provider to do that. The first time I had an u/s was when I was fairly certain I was miscarrying at 11weeks (I started bleeding). The tech couldn't say anything, although I could tell from the look he had that he couldn't find the heartbeat. The MD then came to discuss it with me later. The next pg all my u/s were donw by the OB in her office, so she discussed it as she was doing it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New NEJM study on Down's Syndrome screening | Ericka Kammerer | Pregnancy | 1 | November 10th 05 06:30 PM |
critical screening tests during pregnancy? | oregonchick | Pregnancy | 6 | August 30th 05 02:30 AM |
pregnancy and peak experiences | Carl Jones | Kids Health | 6 | January 6th 05 10:45 AM |
Screening for parents of attention-deficit kids? | JG | Kids Health | 15 | January 12th 04 07:54 AM |
result of my antenatal screening for down's syndrome and neural tubedefects | pcb | Pregnancy | 4 | November 2nd 03 12:07 AM |