|If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.|
||Thread Tools||Display Modes|
'Judges have ignored the law and calculated veterans' disability into divorce settlements'
'Judges have ignored the law and calculated veterans' disability into
By Glenn Sacks, MA for Fathers & Families | Apr 10, 2009
Typical of our family court system--disabled veterans are being forced to
pay alimony from their disability benefits. From a new report from KWQC TV
in Davenport, Iowa:
When a soldier suffers a life altering injury in combat, they receive
disability benefits from the government. Those benefits are supposed to be
only for the wounded soldier, but in some cases that's not happening.
A federal law states a disabled veteran's benefits cannot be used as
divisible assets during bankruptcy, in a divorce and for child support. But
a group founded to make sure that doesn't happen, says some state judges
aren't paying any attention to the law.
"She wasn't disabled, she was an able bodied, non-military person," says
Jere Beery who works for the veterans advocacy group, Operation Firing For
Effect. He joined the group after a judge ruled Beery had to give a portion
of his disability benefits to his ex-wife. He adds, "My wife never had to
take the medications I had to take, she doesn't have the disfiguring scars I
have, she doesn't wake up in the middle of the night with strange noises."
The Vietnam Veteran refused to pay and filed complaints. Eventually his
wife said she didn't want the benefits anymore. But it got Beery involved in
helping others fight the same battle he did. "Keep in mind we're talking
about the most severely disabled veterans from combat situations, we're
talking about wounds, IED, brain trauma, amputees, bed ridden veterans,"
according to Beery.
And it's just not men, it's also disabled female veterans experiencing
these problems when they get divorced or declare bankruptcy. Gene Simes,
National Chairman of Operation Firing for Effect, says he's worked with
veterans all over the country and it boils down to judges aren't educated
about disabled veterans rights. Simes say, "When a judge tells you, you have
rights, no constitutional rights that judge is violating the rules of this
nation and what he is set to be. He is just as guilty if he was a crook
Once a judge makes their ruling, there's really nothing that can be done
other than to violate the order. So their goal is to make sure judges
understand what it means to be a disabled veteran. "They've gotten away with
it for so many years and used so many bad rulings as reference cases it's a
ways of life in the judicial system," adds Beery.
The group is monitoring 40 cases all over the country of judges
mishandling disability benefits...
In California, Senator Rod Wright, with help from Michael Robinson of the
California Alliance for Families and Children and Dennis Egge, President of
the American Retiree Association, is sponsoring a bill to address the
situation. SB 285 will uphold existing federal law--USC, Title 38, Section
5301, which governs third party disbursement of disabled veterans' benefits
compensation. According to Robinson:
Although United States Code, Title 38, Section 5301 is very clear in its
wording and intent, civil court judges nationwide have routinely ignored the
U.S. Code and have calculated veterans' disability compensation into divorce
settlements as a divisible asset or income.
And it's just not men; it's also disabled female veterans experiencing
these problems when they get divorced or declare bankruptcy.
To watch a video of the KWQC TV report:
1) Click here
2) Click here and scroll ahead to 1:05:00.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|The divorce regime is the most totalitarian institution ever to arise in the United States. Its operatives in the family courts and the social service agencies recognize no private sphere of life. "The power of family court judges is almost unli||Chaz||Child Support||1||November 14th 07 12:20 AM|
|Calculated, Risk Is Worth Benefit of Eating Fish||Roman Bystrianyk||Pregnancy||6||June 24th 05 06:49 PM|
|Derogatory baby language (and veterans)||Todd Gastaldo||Pregnancy||0||December 12th 04 03:56 PM|
|Prevention for women veterans (babies too)||Todd Gastaldo||Pregnancy||0||October 11th 04 07:47 AM|
|*Malicious prosecution* settlements approved in Oz, Canada||Fern5827||Spanking||0||February 16th 04 08:28 PM|