A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » misc.kids » Kids Health
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

ratbags/Bowditch



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 9th 06, 08:02 PM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids.health,uk.people.health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default ratbags/Bowditch

This must have been where Ratbags/Bowditch got his name from:



FOREWORD

by DR ARCHIE KALOKERINOS to Ian Sincliar vaccine book
http://www.vaccinationdebate.com/

To immunize or not to immunize is a question that, today, is often asked. To
answer is difficult. So much knowledge is required for even partial
understanding that one would almost find it necessary to complete a
university course in medicine before even the basic facts could be grasped
logically. There is, therefore, a need for a comprehensive text on the
subject. Ian Sinclair has filled that gap.

Like most physicians, I spent my training and early post graduate years
totally believing in the miracle of vaccines. I remember, only too clearly,
the last polio epidemics that swept through Australia. Several infants,
children and adults died under my care. One of my colleagues suffered almost
total paralysis. When a vaccine was introduced I almost cried with relief
and accepted it blindly.

It was the same with diphtheria. I struggled to save a few and lost a few.
The suffering of those little children is something I will never forget.
Neither will I forget how a tiny boy died in violent spasms due to tetanus.

And so I was totally and firmly on the value of vaccines.

The first change in attitude came ten years after graduation when I observed
that routine vaccinations and immunization made some children sick and could
even lead to death. I must stress that this was an observation - not a
"theory".

So I changed my attitude and realised that children who were ill - even with
a trivial "cold" should not be immunized. To me this was a simple and
important 'fact'. To my surprise, my colleagues not only disagreed, they
became hostile - a hostility that killed two infants in the area under my
partial control. In this way I was forced to think and study more deeply.
What I found was a minefield which was really a conspiracy to hide the truth
from the people on this earth.

I well remember, some years ago, listening to a knighted medical researcher
as he spoke, on the radio, about vaccines. He told two classical stories
form the history books. The first concerned Edward Jenner who, according to
history, watched as the milkmaid caught cowpox and this protected her from
smallpox. So Jenner got some of the 'cowpox' and inoculated it into
someone's arm - it fostered and the pus was then inoculated into someone
else -100% success was claimed. 100% !! How absurd - complete with all
sorts of germs including hepatitis, syphilis and whatever. If one did that
today, without antibiotics, the death rate would be huge.

Worse still, the genetic make up of smallpox vaccine is known today. It is
not cowpox. Where it came from is unknown. Now this does not prove that the
vaccine is inefficient. It simply means that the history is wrong. So do not
let it be used as a basis for supporting vaccination.

Then we have Louis Pasteur and his four dogs. Two were given his rabies
vaccine - two were not. On exposure to rabies the two vaccinated dogs
survived. The two non-vaccinated dogs died. TRIUMPH!! So it seems, but what
rubbish.

First, Pasteur tried to get that result many times and failed. The two
vaccinated dogs would die - or one would die. Eventually, by chance he got
the "right" result and this is what is told in history (only that).

Even today a rabies vaccine cannot be made that gives such protection. With
tetanus I can tell a personal story. At University we were taught that no
cases of tetanus occurred during World War II amongst Australian Service men
because they were all vaccinated against tetanus. I believed this until I
suffered an injury after being fully immunized. I received a booster shot
and got tetanus. The cultural shock was enormous. When I reviewed the
literature I found many such cases. In civilian practice it is impossible to
totally protect against tetanus. Under near ideal conditions, there were in
fact, cases in the army. They were kept well hidden.

Three outstanding fiascos during recent years demonstrate how the entrenched
attitudes of medical authorities lead to enormous loss of life and
suffering. All three I personally tried to stop and was soundly abused. The
first is the immunization campaigns in Africa where dirty needles were used.
It is thought by many that this is what spread AIDS so rapidly.

The second was the swine flu fiasco in the USA 1976. The history of that
should be studied by all.

The third is the use of AIDS loaded hepatitis B vaccine by the Canadian
Health Authorities in the 1980s.

If doctors like myself are to be regarded as "ratbags" - then how does one
explain these three massive tragic events?

Only after realising that routine immunizations were dangerous did I achieve
a substantial drop in infant death rates. It is, therefore, with a sense of
gratitude, that I welcome the contribution made by Ian Sinclair.

Dr Archie Kalokerinos


  #2  
Old January 9th 06, 11:26 PM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids.health,uk.people.health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default ratbags/Bowditch


"john" wrote in message
...
This must have been where Ratbags/Bowditch got his name from:


Nice personal attack.

Jeff


  #3  
Old January 9th 06, 11:43 PM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids.health,uk.people.health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default ratbags/Bowditch


"john" wrote in message
...
This must have been where Ratbags/Bowditch got his name from:


.....

The "ratbags" on the www.ratbags.com refers to the 1000 nefarious websites
which peddle sillyness, bad advice, lies, worthless medical devices and
sheer loonyness, which most people realize once they read it.

Bowditch as a surname is no worse nor better than Scudamore.


  #4  
Old January 10th 06, 12:42 AM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids.health,uk.people.health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default ratbags/Bowditch


"HCN" wrote in message
. ..

"john" wrote in message
...
This must have been where Ratbags/Bowditch got his name from:


....

The "ratbags" on the www.ratbags.com refers to the 1000 nefarious websites
which peddle sillyness, bad advice, lies, worthless medical devices and
sheer loonyness, which most people realize once they read it.


Hey, I take exception to that comment.

My website on cellsalts is one of the 1000, and I think cellsalts are very
good treatment for many conditions.
Anybody who would bag knowledge of nutritional remedies ( calcium,
potassium, sodium, silica, sulphur, etc ) doesn't understand the basics of
good health and nutrition.

Carole
http://www.cellsalts.net
http://www.conspiracee.com




  #5  
Old January 10th 06, 05:53 AM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids.health,uk.people.health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default ratbags/Bowditch

In article ,
Carole wrote:

"HCN" wrote in message
...

"john" wrote in message
...
This must have been where Ratbags/Bowditch got his name from:


....

The "ratbags" on the www.ratbags.com refers to the 1000 nefarious websites
which peddle sillyness, bad advice, lies, worthless medical devices and
sheer loonyness, which most people realize once they read it.


Hey, I take exception to that comment.

My website on cellsalts is one of the 1000, and I think cellsalts are very
good treatment for many conditions.
Anybody who would bag knowledge of nutritional remedies ( calcium,
potassium, sodium, silica, sulphur, etc ) doesn't understand the basics of
good health and nutrition.


Carole, you don't even understand the basics of chemistry. You're
hardly an authority.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"If you can't say something nice, then sit next to me."
-- Alice Roosevelt Longworth
  #6  
Old January 10th 06, 02:00 PM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids.health,uk.people.health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default ratbags/Bowditch

Carole wrote:
"HCN" wrote in message
. ..

"john" wrote in message
...

This must have been where Ratbags/Bowditch got his name from:



....

The "ratbags" on the www.ratbags.com refers to the 1000 nefarious websites
which peddle sillyness, bad advice, lies, worthless medical devices and
sheer loonyness, which most people realize once they read it.



Hey, I take exception to that comment.


You can take exception to your hearts content. However, that does not
make your websites any less loonie.

My website on cellsalts is one of the 1000, and I think cellsalts are very
good treatment for many conditions.


That is why it is listed.

Anybody who would bag knowledge of nutritional remedies ( calcium,
potassium, sodium, silica, sulphur, etc ) doesn't understand the basics of
good health and nutrition.


Sure.

Loonie sites deleted.
  #7  
Old January 10th 06, 03:13 PM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids.health,uk.people.health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default ratbags/Bowditch


"Jeff" wrote in message
ink.net...

"john" wrote in message
...
This must have been where Ratbags/Bowditch got his name from:


Nice personal attack.

Jeff


thanks


  #8  
Old January 12th 06, 10:49 PM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids.health,uk.people.health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default ratbags/Bowditch


David Wright wrote:
In article ,
Carole wrote:



My website on cellsalts is one of the 1000, and I think cellsalts are very
good treatment for many conditions.
Anybody who would bag knowledge of nutritional remedies ( calcium,
potassium, sodium, silica, sulphur, etc ) doesn't understand the basics of
good health and nutrition.


Carole, you don't even understand the basics of chemistry. You're
hardly an authority.


Who cares?
Probably if I'd been through a science course I'd be as mind controlled
as the rest of you.
We all know about the Rockefeller donations towards major schools of
learning, and how they influenced what was taught.

Carole
http://www.cellsalts.net

  #9  
Old January 12th 06, 10:58 PM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids.health,uk.people.health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default ratbags/Bowditch


"carole" wrote in message
oups.com...

David Wright wrote:
In article
,
Carole wrote:



My website on cellsalts is one of the 1000, and I think cellsalts are
very
good treatment for many conditions.
Anybody who would bag knowledge of nutritional remedies ( calcium,
potassium, sodium, silica, sulphur, etc ) doesn't understand the basics
of
good health and nutrition.


Carole, you don't even understand the basics of chemistry. You're
hardly an authority.


Who cares?
Probably if I'd been through a science course I'd be as mind controlled
as the rest of you.
We all know about the Rockefeller donations towards major schools of
learning, and how they influenced what was taught.


Riiight. The Rockefellers are manipulating the schools to teach false
doctrines of chemistry, and the key to truth is ignorance.This may be the
stupidest conspiracy theory of all. Do the Rockefellers have secret schools
where they teach the REAL chemistry to develop chemists who are sworn to
secrecy and enslaved to the Rockefeller petrochemical companies?
--


--Rich

Recommended websites:

http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
http://www.acahf.org.au
http://www.quackwatch.org/
http://www.skeptic.com/
http://www.csicop.org/


  #10  
Old January 13th 06, 01:20 AM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids.health,uk.people.health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default ratbags/Bowditch

carole wrote:
David Wright wrote:

In article ,
Carole wrote:



My website on cellsalts is one of the 1000, and I think cellsalts are very
good treatment for many conditions.
Anybody who would bag knowledge of nutritional remedies ( calcium,
potassium, sodium, silica, sulphur, etc ) doesn't understand the basics of
good health and nutrition.


Carole, you don't even understand the basics of chemistry. You're
hardly an authority.



Who cares?
Probably if I'd been through a science course I'd be as mind controlled
as the rest of you.
We all know about the Rockefeller donations towards major schools of
learning, and how they influenced what was taught.


I must agree with you. The Rockefellers have so much money that they
created quantum physics, the General Theory of Relativity, all of
biology, and String Theory.

Yes, money is the most powerful thing in the universe. It is the
principal component of Dark Energy and Dark Matter.





Carole
http://www.cellsalts.net

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.