If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Any lawyers want to sue to make child support unconstitutional?
I'd be willing to be the Plaintiff. If you're not a lawyer, and want to pay
for one for me, I'd do it too. I have no children, primarily because if I did, I'd lose my constitutional rights and could wind up in prison for failure to pay child support, which effectively makes it a debtor's prison. This is the SOLE reason I choose not to have children. The child support laws violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution because it puts poor men at risk of prison, while wealthy men do not have this risk. -- "Google maintains the USENET." -- The Honorable R. Barclay Surrick, Eastern District of PA Judge From Parker v. Google, E.D.Pa. #04-cv-3918 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Any lawyers want to sue to make child support unconstitutional?
"'Kate" wrote in message
... On Sun, 6 Aug 2006 18:09:23 -0400, "Ray Gordon" the following was posted in blue dry erase marker: I'd be willing to be the Plaintiff. If you're not a lawyer, and want to pay for one for me, I'd do it too. I have no children, primarily because if I did, I'd lose my constitutional rights and could wind up in prison for failure to pay child support, which effectively makes it a debtor's prison. So, as a public service, you decided to post this to alt.support.single-parents. Nice. This is the SOLE reason I choose not to have children. That's not what I heard. The child support laws violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution because it puts poor men at risk of prison, while wealthy men do not have this risk. Ya wingnut. As a single father with custody who pays $1000 / month in daycare during the summer, I would have to object as well. Just excuse one parent from all financial responsibility?! ooohh... don't get me started... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Any lawyers want to sue to make child support unconstitutional?
"Ray Gordon" wrote in message om... I'd be willing to be the Plaintiff. If you're not a lawyer, and want to pay for one for me, I'd do it too. I have no children, primarily because if I did, I'd lose my constitutional rights and could wind up in prison for failure to pay child support, which effectively makes it a debtor's prison. This is the SOLE reason I choose not to have children. ....the same way a porcupine chooses not to fly. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Any lawyers want to sue to make child support unconstitutional?
"'Kate" wrote in message ... On Sun, 6 Aug 2006 18:09:23 -0400, "Ray Gordon" the following was posted in blue dry erase marker: I'd be willing to be the Plaintiff. If you're not a lawyer, and want to pay for one for me, I'd do it too. I have no children, primarily because if I did, I'd lose my constitutional rights and could wind up in prison for failure to pay child support, which effectively makes it a debtor's prison. So, as a public service, you decided to post this to alt.support.single-parents. Nice. This is the SOLE reason I choose not to have children. That's not what I heard. The child support laws violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution because it puts poor men at risk of prison, while wealthy men do not have this risk. Ya wingnut. How do you know the OP is a Detroit hockey fan? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Any lawyers want to sue to make child support unconstitutional?
Ray Gordon wrote: I'd be willing to be the Plaintiff. If you're not a lawyer, and want to pay for one for me, I'd do it too. I have no children, primarily because Bull****! Sam |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Any lawyers want to sue to make child support unconstitutional?
wrote in message ups.com... Mike wrote: "'Kate" wrote in message ... On Sun, 6 Aug 2006 18:09:23 -0400, "Ray Gordon" the following was posted in blue dry erase marker: I'd be willing to be the Plaintiff. If you're not a lawyer, and want to pay for one for me, I'd do it too. I have no children, primarily because if I did, I'd lose my constitutional rights and could wind up in prison for failure to pay child support, which effectively makes it a debtor's prison. So, as a public service, you decided to post this to alt.support.single-parents. Nice. This is the SOLE reason I choose not to have children. That's not what I heard. The child support laws violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution because it puts poor men at risk of prison, while wealthy men do not have this risk. Ya wingnut. As a single father with custody who pays $1000 / month in daycare during the summer, I would have to object as well. Just excuse one parent from all financial responsibility?! ooohh... don't get me started... I paid child support - gladly. Those are my kids too. I never felt my "constitutional rights" to be infringed in any way. Now they're all grown up and I still send them money. It's just what a responsible father does. Sam Some people should just *not* have children, and, thankfully, the OP claims to have no children. Any responsible parent - mother or father - should help to support their children, as yes, you put it great when you said, "Those are my kids too." |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Any lawyers want to sue to make child support unconstitutional?
'Kate wrote: On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 23:35:18 -0400, "P. Fritz" paulfritz ATvoyager DOTnet the following was posted in blue dry erase marker: "'Kate" wrote in message news On Sun, 6 Aug 2006 21:51:13 -0400, "P. Fritz" paulfritz ATvoyager DOTnet the following was posted in blue dry erase marker: How do you know the OP is a Detroit hockey fan? My apologies to the Detroit fans! Next, you will be complaining about you (insert non functioning appliance) being on the fritz!!!! ;-) LOL... Oh the possibilities. grin I saw the possibilities myself and had to sit on my hands to be a good girl......something tells me Paul is well aware of the possibilities LOL! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Any lawyers want to sue to make child support unconstitutional?
xkatx wrote: wrote in message ups.com... Mike wrote: "'Kate" wrote in message ... On Sun, 6 Aug 2006 18:09:23 -0400, "Ray Gordon" the following was posted in blue dry erase marker: I'd be willing to be the Plaintiff. If you're not a lawyer, and want to pay for one for me, I'd do it too. I have no children, primarily because if I did, I'd lose my constitutional rights and could wind up in prison for failure to pay child support, which effectively makes it a debtor's prison. So, as a public service, you decided to post this to alt.support.single-parents. Nice. This is the SOLE reason I choose not to have children. That's not what I heard. The child support laws violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution because it puts poor men at risk of prison, while wealthy men do not have this risk. Ya wingnut. As a single father with custody who pays $1000 / month in daycare during the summer, I would have to object as well. Just excuse one parent from all financial responsibility?! ooohh... don't get me started... I paid child support - gladly. Those are my kids too. I never felt my "constitutional rights" to be infringed in any way. Now they're all grown up and I still send them money. It's just what a responsible father does. Sam Some people should just *not* have children, and, thankfully, the OP claims to have no children. Any responsible parent - mother or father - should help to support their children, as yes, you put it great when you said, "Those are my kids too." Google that guy. That'll tell you everything you need to know. I did the best job of being a father I could. I suppose I could have been a better one. I was a cop for 25 years and cops have a high divorce rate. But I always stayed in their lives - made as many birthdays, dance recitals, soccer games as I could. I took them school shopping or just out to lunch. Never missed a child support payment. But being a cop was in my blood. I'm third generation law enforcement. When I joined SWAT, my first wife decided that that was enough. I don't blame her. Later she married a nice, quiet, school teacher. Sam |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Any lawyers want to sue to make child support unconstitutional?
Ray Gordon wrote:
I'd be willing to be the Plaintiff. If you're not a lawyer, and want to pay for one for me, I'd do it too. I have no children, primarily because if I did, I'd lose my constitutional rights and could wind up in prison for failure to pay child support, which effectively makes it a debtor's prison. Wrong. Refusing to pay will send you to prison. An inability to pay will not. Don't confuse the two. If after the sadness of losing losing your wife to divorce, you slip through the cracks in depression and don't qualify for any financial assistance and resort to dumpster diving to support yourself, you obviously have no means to pay child support. You will not go to prison not having the means to pay child support. This is the SOLE reason I choose not to have children. It is a good reason not to have children and there are many more good reasons, too. But with the million of good women who don't want to get married, why even bother with that. The child support laws violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution because it puts poor men at risk of prison, while wealthy men do not have this risk. Poor men in any society can only afford to work and have a few beers because the rest of the money must to support the wife and kids. That is true in all cultures on the planet. Wealthy men can by anything they want and make as many mistakes as they wish because they have the money or pay for whatever they want. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Any lawyers want to sue to make child support unconstitutional?
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 18:49:39 GMT, in article
, enquiring minds spewed forth.... Ray Gordon wrote: I'd be willing to be the Plaintiff. If you're not a lawyer, and want to pay for one for me, I'd do it too. I have no children, primarily because if I did, I'd lose my constitutional rights and could wind up in prison for failure to pay child support, which effectively makes it a debtor's prison. Wrong. Refusing to pay will send you to prison. An inability to pay will not. Don't confuse the two. If after the sadness of losing losing your wife to divorce, you slip through the cracks in depression and don't qualify for any financial assistance and resort to dumpster diving to support yourself, you obviously have no means to pay child support. You will not go to prison not having the means to pay child support. This is the SOLE reason I choose not to have children. It is a good reason not to have children and there are many more good reasons, too. But with the million of good women who don't want to get married, why even bother with that. The child support laws violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution because it puts poor men at risk of prison, while wealthy men do not have this risk. Poor men in any society can only afford to work and have a few beers because the rest of the money must to support the wife and kids. That is true in all cultures on the planet. Wealthy men can by anything they want and make as many mistakes as they wish because they have the money or pay for whatever they want. If such men are in no condition to support a child, they should use a little thing called a CONDOM... or abstain from sex completely. And yes, the same applies to women... it's called BIRTH CONTROL... use it. -- "Eloquence is hard!" - Talking G.I. Joe "Fact-free cow**** claim fails" - Andre sympathises with Joe FACT: Female is Nature's default gender setting -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NJ: Ruling on indigent parents reversed | Dusty | Child Support | 1 | March 13th 06 10:32 PM |
Canadian Judge ok's Dad's apanking in Calgary divorce case | Fern5827 | Spanking | 8 | October 4th 05 03:43 AM |
Paternity Fraud - US Supreme Court | Wizardlaw | Child Support | 12 | June 4th 04 02:19 AM |
Kids should work. | LaVonne Carlson | General | 22 | December 7th 03 04:27 AM |
Dennis was U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking | Kane | Spanking | 63 | November 17th 03 10:12 PM |